These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19654928)

  • 1. Childhood lead poisoning: conservative estimates of the social and economic benefits of lead hazard control.
    Gould E
    Environ Health Perspect; 2009 Jul; 117(7):1162-7. PubMed ID: 19654928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Childhood lead exposure in France: benefit estimation and partial cost-benefit analysis of lead hazard control.
    Pichery C; Bellanger M; Zmirou-Navier D; Glorennec P; Hartemann P; Grandjean P
    Environ Health; 2011 May; 10():44. PubMed ID: 21599937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monetary benefits of preventing childhood lead poisoning with lead-safe window replacement.
    Nevin R; Jacobs DE; Berg M; Cohen J
    Environ Res; 2008 Mar; 106(3):410-9. PubMed ID: 17961540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Making the needed linkages and economic case for continued lead-paint abatement.
    Geller AM
    Environ Health Perspect; 2009 Aug; 117(8):A332-4. PubMed ID: 19672376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of a 20-year forecast of US childhood lead poisoning: Updated prospects for 2010.
    Jacobs DE; Nevin R
    Environ Res; 2006 Nov; 102(3):352-64. PubMed ID: 17162757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reducing the staggering costs of environmental disease in children, estimated at $76.6 billion in 2008.
    Trasande L; Liu Y
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2011 May; 30(5):863-70. PubMed ID: 21543421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Economic justification for the Tennessee Lead Elimination Action Program.
    Welborn C; Boraiko C; Ralston F; Mera J
    Tenn Med; 2011 Mar; 104(3):39-43. PubMed ID: 21818933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the effectiveness of state specific lead-based paint hazard risk reduction laws in preventing recurring incidences of lead poisoning in children.
    Kennedy C; Lordo R; Sucosky MS; Boehm R; Brown MJ
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2016 Jan; 219(1):110-7. PubMed ID: 26472219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Environmental pollutants and disease in American children: estimates of morbidity, mortality, and costs for lead poisoning, asthma, cancer, and developmental disabilities.
    Landrigan PJ; Schechter CB; Lipton JM; Fahs MC; Schwartz J
    Environ Health Perspect; 2002 Jul; 110(7):721-8. PubMed ID: 12117650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of lead-based paint hazard remediation on blood lead levels of lead poisoned children in New York City.
    Leighton J; Klitzman S; Sedlar S; Matte T; Cohen NL
    Environ Res; 2003 Jul; 92(3):182-90. PubMed ID: 12804514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The social costs of childhood lead exposure in the post-lead regulation era.
    Muennig P
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2009 Sep; 163(9):844-9. PubMed ID: 19736339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Establishing and Achieving National Goals for Preventing Lead Toxicity and Exposure in Children.
    Bellinger DC; Chen A; Lanphear BP
    JAMA Pediatr; 2017 Jul; 171(7):616-618. PubMed ID: 28505218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Societal benefits of reducing lead exposure.
    Schwartz J
    Environ Res; 1994 Jul; 66(1):105-24. PubMed ID: 8013434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Motor vehicle safety, health care, and taxes. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 1994; 9(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 10155483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost effectiveness of lead screening.
    Berwick DM; Komaroff AL
    N Engl J Med; 1982 Jun; 306(23):1392-8. PubMed ID: 6804866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Management of childhood lead poisoning: clinical impact and cost-effectiveness.
    Glotzer DE; Freedberg KA; Bauchner H
    Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 7898292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Window replacement and residential lead paint hazard control 12 years later.
    Dixon SL; Jacobs DE; Wilson JW; Akoto JY; Nevin R; Scott Clark C
    Environ Res; 2012 Feb; 113():14-20. PubMed ID: 22325333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Public economic gains from tax-financed investments in childhood immunization in the United States.
    Connolly MP; Kotsopoulos N; Roberts C; Kotlikoff L; Bloom DE; Hu T; Nyaku M
    PLOS Glob Public Health; 2023; 3(10):e0002461. PubMed ID: 37851624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neighborhood-Level Lead Paint Hazard for Children under 6: A Tool for Proactive and Equitable Intervention.
    Baek M; Outrich MB; Barnett KS; Reece J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Mar; 18(5):. PubMed ID: 33802321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Removing Michigan's Lead Water Service Lines: Economic Savings, Health Benefits, And Improved Health Equity.
    Rhyan C; Miller G; Betanzo E; Hanna-Attisha M
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2023 Aug; 42(8):1162-1172. PubMed ID: 37549335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.