These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19655547)

  • 1. Vertical dimension of the face analyzed by digital photographs.
    Gomes VL; Gonçalves LC; Correia CL; Lucas BL; Carvalho PM
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2008; 3(4):362-70. PubMed ID: 19655547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ranking facial attractiveness.
    Knight H; Keith O
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 16043472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of increasing occlusal vertical dimension on face height.
    Gross MD; Nissan J; Ormianer Z; Dvori S; Shifman A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):353-7. PubMed ID: 12170849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Divine proportions and facial esthetics after manipulation of frontal photographs.
    Medici Filho E; Martins MV; dos Santos da Silva MA; Castilho JC; de Moraes LC; Gil CT
    World J Orthod; 2007; 8(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 17580503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cephalometric indicators of the vertical dimension of occlusion.
    Strajnić L; Stanisić-Sinobad D; Marković D; Stojanović L
    Coll Antropol; 2008 Jun; 32(2):535-41. PubMed ID: 18756907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cephalometric estimation of vertical dimension of occlusion.
    Orthlieb JD; Laurent M; Laplanche O
    J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Sep; 27(9):802-7. PubMed ID: 11012856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Smile analysis in different facial patterns and its correlation with underlying hard tissues.
    Grover N; Kapoor DN; Verma S; Bharadwaj P
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():28. PubMed ID: 26341345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A proposed linear skeletal distance to predict occlusal vertical dimension: A cephalometric study.
    Alhajj MN; Daer AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Dec; 118(6):732-735. PubMed ID: 28434682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Facial soft tissue thickness differences among different vertical facial patterns.
    Saadeh M; Fayyad-Kazan H; Haddad R; Ayoub F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Dec; 317():110468. PubMed ID: 32971443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in Lower Facial Height and Facial Esthetics with Incremental Increases in Occlusal Vertical Dimension in Dentate Subjects.
    Orenstein NP; Bidra AS; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Uribe F; Litt MD
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(4):363-70. PubMed ID: 26218018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlations between cephalometric and facial photographic measurements of craniofacial form.
    Zhang X; Hans MG; Graham G; Kirchner HL; Redline S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 17208108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An orthodontic view of dentofacial esthetics.
    Morris W
    Compendium; 1994 Mar; 15(3):378, 380-2, 384 passim; quiz 390. PubMed ID: 8205591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity and reliability of facial profile evaluation in vertical and horizontal dimensions from lateral cephalograms and lateral photographs.
    Michiels G; Sather AH
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 8006483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dentofacial deformities treated according to a dentoskeletal analysis based on the divine proportion: are the resulting faces de facto "divinely" proportioned?
    Scolozzi P; Momjian A; Courvoisier D
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 22(1):147-50. PubMed ID: 21187759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cumulative frequency distribution in East Asian facial widths using the facial golden mask.
    Lee JH; Kim TG; Park GW; Kim YH
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20(5):1378-82. PubMed ID: 19816261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Face Anthropometry and Digital 2D-Face Photogrammetry as Methods for Predicting Vertical Dimension of Occlusion.
    Strajnić L; Perić M; Živković N; Lemić AM; Vučinić N; Miličić B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Jun; (3):282-292. PubMed ID: 37824121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distance between the medialis angles of the eyes as an anatomical parameter for tooth selection.
    Lucas BL; Bernardino-Júnior R; Gonçalves LC; Gomes VL
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Nov; 36(11):840-7. PubMed ID: 19765195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment.
    Shell TL; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):51-63. PubMed ID: 16429875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new approach for the analysis of facial growth and age estimation: Iris ratio.
    Machado CEP; Flores MRP; Lima LNC; Tinoco RLR; Franco A; Bezerra ACB; Evison MP; Guimarães MA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180330. PubMed ID: 28686631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vertical proportions of face: a cephalometric study.
    Kharbanda OP; Sidhu SS; Sundrum KR
    Int J Orthod; 1991; 29(3-4):6-8. PubMed ID: 1802874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.