These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19655547)

  • 21. Facially generated occlusal vertical dimension.
    Mack MR
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1997 Dec; 18(12):1183-6, 1188, 1190 passim; quiz 119. PubMed ID: 9656843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cephalometric soft tissue facial analysis.
    Bergman RT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Oct; 116(4):373-89. PubMed ID: 10511665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
    Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparative study of the upper and lower vertical facial measurements of the Filipinos as it is used in the Willis method for determining the vertical dimension of occlusion.
    Tina-Olaivar EO; Olaivar OK
    J Philipp Dent Assoc; 1998; 50(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 10202517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Changes in facial dimensions assessed from lateral and frontal photographs. Part I--Methodology.
    Bishara SE; Jorgensen GJ; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Oct; 108(4):389-93. PubMed ID: 7572850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Vertical dimension of the lower facial third in frontal facial examination].
    Tocornal F; Madsen R; Paniagua H
    Odontol Chil; 1990 Apr; 38(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 2099390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of lower face vertical proportion on facial attractiveness.
    Johnston DJ; Hunt O; Johnston CD; Burden DJ; Stevenson M; Hepper P
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 15961569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of facial anthropometric parameters in 11-17 year old boys.
    Jahanbin A; Mahdavishahri N; Baghayeripour M; Esmaily H; Eslami N
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2012; 37(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 23342574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A craniometry-based predictive model to determine occlusal vertical dimension.
    Morata C; Pizarro A; Gonzalez H; Frugone-Zambra R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Apr; 123(4):611-617. PubMed ID: 31383526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Frontal soft tissue analysis using a 3 dimensional camera following two-jaw rotational orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III patients.
    Choi JW; Lee JY; Oh TS; Kwon SM; Yang SJ; Koh KS
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 42(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 23870714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment of facial analysis measurements by golden proportion.
    Kaya KS; Türk B; Cankaya M; Seyhun N; Coşkun BU
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2019; 85(4):494-501. PubMed ID: 30170969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Correlation between facial measurements and the mesiodistal width of the maxillary anterior teeth.
    Gomes VL; Gonçalves LC; do Prado CJ; Junior IL; de Lima Lucas B
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(4):196-205; discussion 205. PubMed ID: 16911420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Applicability of a pre-established set of facial proportions from frontal photographs in forensic age estimation of a Brazilian population.
    Machado CEP; Santiago BM; Lima LNC; Gonzales PS; Franco A; Vidal FB; Aguilera IA; Guimarães MA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Aug; 301():e1-e7. PubMed ID: 31176532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Photographic soft-tissue profile analysis in children at 6 years of age.
    Dimaggio FR; Ciusa V; Sforza C; Ferrario VF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):475-80. PubMed ID: 17920500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Habitual daily masseter activity of subjects with different vertical craniofacial morphology.
    Farella M; Michelotti A; Carbone G; Gallo LM; Palla S; Martina R
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Oct; 113(5):380-5. PubMed ID: 16202024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cephalometric analysis of dentofacial normals.
    Scheideman GB; Bell WH; Legan HL; Finn RA; Reisch JS
    Am J Orthod; 1980 Oct; 78(4):404-20. PubMed ID: 6933849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Facial three-dimensional morphometry.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Poggio CE; Serrao G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Jan; 109(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 8540488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The role of the divine proportion in the esthetic improvement of patients undergoing combined orthodontic/orthognathic surgical treatment.
    Baker BW; Woods MG
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(2):108-20. PubMed ID: 11482289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Validity and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements obtained from digital photographs of analogue headfilms.
    Grybauskas S; Balciuniene I; Vetra J
    Stomatologija; 2007; 9(4):114-20. PubMed ID: 18303276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Divine proportion in facial esthetics.
    Ricketts RM
    Clin Plast Surg; 1982 Oct; 9(4):401-22. PubMed ID: 7172592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.