145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19657185)
1. Auditory steady-state evoked responses for preterm and term neonates.
Ribeiro FM; Carvallo RM; Marcoux AM
Audiol Neurootol; 2010; 15(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 19657185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Latencies of auditory steady-state responses recorded in early infancy.
Alaerts J; Luts H; Van Dun B; Desloovere C; Wouters J
Audiol Neurootol; 2010; 15(2):116-27. PubMed ID: 19657187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiple auditory steady-state response thresholds to bone-conduction stimuli in young infants with normal hearing.
Small SA; Stapells DR
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 16672791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and tone-burst auditory brainstem responses in normal babies.
Rance G; Tomlin D; Rickards FW
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):751-62. PubMed ID: 17086084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical application of dichotic multiple-stimulus auditory steady-state responses in high-risk newborns and young children.
Luts H; Desloovere C; Wouters J
Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11(1):24-37. PubMed ID: 16219992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic validity of dichotic multiple frequencies auditory steady-state responses versus distortion product otoacoustic emissions in hearing screening of high risk neonates.
Mahmoudian S; Farhadi M; Kadivar M; Ghalehbaghi B; Rahimi F; Hemami MR; Kamrava SK; Asghari A; Amintehran E; Mohagheghi P
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Sep; 75(9):1109-16. PubMed ID: 21719120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response show the binaural masking level difference?
Ishida IM; Stapells DR
Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):713-5. PubMed ID: 19701090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Changes in transient-evoked otoacoustic emission levels with negative tympanometric peak pressure in infants and toddlers.
Prieve BA; Calandruccio L; Fitzgerald T; Mazevski A; Georgantas LM
Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):533-42. PubMed ID: 18469719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Otoacoustic emissions latency difference between full-term and preterm neonates.
Jedrzejczak WW; Hatzopoulos S; Martini A; Blinowska KJ
Hear Res; 2007 Sep; 231(1-2):54-62. PubMed ID: 17606343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in neonates and effect of contralateral white noise stimulation.
Franz B; Altidis P; Altidis B
Int Tinnitus J; 2000; 6(2):168-71. PubMed ID: 14689637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dichotic multiple-frequency auditory steady-state responses in evaluating the hearing thresholds of occupational noise-exposed workers.
Hsu RF; Chen SS; Lu SN; Ho CK; Lin HF
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2011 Aug; 27(8):330-5. PubMed ID: 21802644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of 40 Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) thresholds in awake adult subjects.
Tomlin D; Rance G; Graydon K; Tsialios I
Int J Audiol; 2006 Oct; 45(10):580-8. PubMed ID: 17062499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Auditory steady-state responses to bone conduction stimuli in children with hearing loss.
Swanepoel de W; Ebrahim S; Friedland P; Swanepoel A; Pottas L
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Dec; 72(12):1861-71. PubMed ID: 18963045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evoked otoacoustic emissions as a screening test for hearing evaluation in newborn and premature infants?].
Uppenkamp S; Jäkel M; Talartschick B; Büschel J; Kollmeier B
Laryngorhinootologie; 1992 Oct; 71(10):525-9. PubMed ID: 1418230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of the detection paradigm in recording auditory steady-state responses.
Luts H; Van Dun B; Alaerts J; Wouters J
Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):638-50. PubMed ID: 18469712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Maturation of bone conduction multiple auditory steady-state responses.
Small SA; Stapells DR
Int J Audiol; 2008 Aug; 47(8):476-88. PubMed ID: 18608532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Results of neonatal hearing screening with transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions].
Sitka U; Rasinski C; Gall V
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 1995; 199(2):71-7. PubMed ID: 7788581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of contralateral noise on 40-Hz and 80-Hz auditory steady-state responses.
Maki A; Kawase T; Kobayashi T
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):584-9. PubMed ID: 19550336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Meta-analysis of variables that affect accuracy of threshold estimation via measurement of the auditory steady-state response (ASSR).
Tlumak AI; Rubinstein E; Durrant JD
Int J Audiol; 2007 Nov; 46(11):692-710. PubMed ID: 17978952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel type of auditory responses: temporal dynamics of 40-Hz steady-state responses induced by changes in sound localization.
Ross B
J Neurophysiol; 2008 Sep; 100(3):1265-77. PubMed ID: 18632891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
