BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

781 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19657275)

  • 41. Dose and time-dependent protection of the antioxidant N-L-acetylcysteine against impulse noise trauma.
    Duan M; Qiu J; Laurell G; Olofsson A; Counter SA; Borg E
    Hear Res; 2004 Jun; 192(1-2):1-9. PubMed ID: 15157958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Calcineurin activation contributes to noise-induced hearing loss.
    Minami SB; Yamashita D; Schacht J; Miller JM
    J Neurosci Res; 2004 Nov; 78(3):383-92. PubMed ID: 15389832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Synergetic protective effects of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor combined with neurotrophin-3 in F-actin on hair cell after noise trauma].
    Yang W; Hu B; Guo W; Hu Y; Wang P; Jiang S
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Oct; 36(5):342-5. PubMed ID: 12761941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Pharmacological rescue of noise induced hearing loss using N-acetylcysteine and acetyl-L-carnitine.
    Coleman JK; Kopke RD; Liu J; Ge X; Harper EA; Jones GE; Cater TL; Jackson RL
    Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 226(1-2):104-13. PubMed ID: 17023129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. GFAP aggregates in the cochlear nerve increase the noise vulnerability of sensory cells in the organ of Corti in the murine model of Alexander disease.
    Masuda M; Tanaka KF; Kanzaki S; Wakabayashi K; Oishi N; Suzuki T; Ikenaka K; Ogawa K
    Neurosci Res; 2008 Sep; 62(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 18602179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The role of the middle ear in acoustic trauma from impulses.
    Eames BL; Hamernik RP; Henderson D; Feldman A
    Laryngoscope; 1975 Sep; 85(9):1582-92. PubMed ID: 1177651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Noise exposures. Effects on hearing and prevention of noise induced hearing loss.
    Lusk SL
    AAOHN J; 1997 Aug; 45(8):397-408; quiz 409-10. PubMed ID: 9341314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Audiometric and histological differences between the effects of continuous and impulsive noise exposures.
    Hamernik RP; Ahroon WA; Hsueh KD; Lei SF; Davis RI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Apr; 93(4 Pt 1):2088-95. PubMed ID: 8473621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The immediate effects of acoustic trauma on excitation and inhibition in the inferior colliculus: A Wiener-kernel analysis.
    Heeringa AN; van Dijk P
    Hear Res; 2016 Jan; 331():47-56. PubMed ID: 26523371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. On the limitation of brainstem auditory evoked potentials for indication of susceptibility to noise.
    Podoshin L; Ben-David J; Sułkowski W; Fradis M; Pratt H; Djerassi L
    Pol J Occup Med Environ Health; 1991; 4(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 1817681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Temporary threshold shift, permanent threshold shift and impulse noise: anatomico-functional aspects].
    Roberto M; Zito F; Hamernik RP; Henderson D; Salvi RJ; Turrentine G
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1986; 6(6):603-11. PubMed ID: 3591283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The clinical free radical scavenger, edaravone, protects cochlear hair cells from acoustic trauma.
    Takemoto T; Sugahara K; Okuda T; Shimogori H; Yamashita H
    Eur J Pharmacol; 2004 Mar; 487(1-3):113-6. PubMed ID: 15033382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The importance of "temporal pattern" in traumatic impulse noise exposures.
    Danielson R; Henderson D; Gratton MA; Bianchi L; Salvi R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):209-18. PubMed ID: 1880291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Hearing loss from interrupted, intermittent, and time varying Gaussian noise exposures: the applicability of the equal energy hypothesis.
    Qiu W; Davis B; Hamernik RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Mar; 121(3):1613-20. PubMed ID: 17407898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Sequence of exposure to noise and toluene can determine loss of auditory sensitivity in the rat.
    Johnson AC; Nylén P; Borg E; Höglund G
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1990; 109(1-2):34-40. PubMed ID: 2309557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Impact noise: the importance of level, duration, and repetition rate.
    Henderson D; Subramaniam M; Gratton MA; Saunders SS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1350-7. PubMed ID: 2030222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Acoustical stress and hearing sensitivity in fishes: does the linear threshold shift hypothesis hold water?
    Smith ME; Kane AS; Popper AN
    J Exp Biol; 2004 Sep; 207(Pt 20):3591-602. PubMed ID: 15339955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The impact of hearing conservation programs on incidence of noise-induced hearing loss in Canadian workers.
    Davies H; Marion S; Teschke K
    Am J Ind Med; 2008 Dec; 51(12):923-31. PubMed ID: 18726988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effectiveness of 4-hydroxy phenyl N-tert-butylnitrone (4-OHPBN) alone and in combination with other antioxidant drugs in the treatment of acute acoustic trauma in chinchilla.
    Choi CH; Chen K; Vasquez-Weldon A; Jackson RL; Floyd RA; Kopke RD
    Free Radic Biol Med; 2008 May; 44(9):1772-84. PubMed ID: 18328271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Sound-induced priming of the chinchilla auditory system.
    Hamernik RP; Ahroon WA
    Hear Res; 1999 Nov; 137(1-2):127-36. PubMed ID: 10545640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 40.