These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 196576)

  • 1. Comparison of foot and mouth disease vaccine potency testing on cattle in terms of the nature of the diluent.
    Stellmann C; Terré J; Favre H; Brun A; Fontaine J
    Arch Virol; 1977; 54(1-2):61-74. PubMed ID: 196576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Intranasal vaccination of cattle against foot-and-mouth disease].
    Bauer K; Straub OC
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1985 Jul; 98(7):247-50. PubMed ID: 2994624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Testing the activity of anti-foot-and-mouth disease vaccine in cattle: quantitative methods of antigenic extinction].
    Terré J; Stellmann C; Brun A; Favre H; Fontaine J
    Dev Biol Stand; 1976; 35():357-67. PubMed ID: 198306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The prospects of oil-adjuvanted foot-and-mouth disease vaccine in South America.
    Sutmoller P
    Dev Biol Stand; 1976; 35():135-8. PubMed ID: 198279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the potency for cattle of trivalent FMD vaccines adjuvanted by aluminum hydroxide-saponin or oil emulsion.
    Barei S; Panina GF; Orfei Z; Nardelli L; Castelli S
    Zentralbl Veterinarmed B; 1979 Aug; 26(6):454-60. PubMed ID: 232342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Immunologic response of lambs to emulsified foot-and-mouth disease vaccine.
    Cunliffe HR; Graves JH
    Arch Gesamte Virusforsch; 1970; 32(2):261-8. PubMed ID: 4322844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Immune responses of goats against foot-and-mouth disease quadrivalent vaccine: comparison of double oil emulsion and aluminium hydroxide gel vaccines in eliciting immunity.
    Patil PK; Bayry J; Ramakrishna C; Hugar B; Misra LD; Natarajan C
    Vaccine; 2002 Jun; 20(21-22):2781-9. PubMed ID: 12034105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Some problems of testing foot-and-mouth disease vaccines. II. Potency testing.
    Soós T
    Acta Vet Hung; 1987; 35(3):331-42. PubMed ID: 2829602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Potency control of foot-and-mouth disease vaccine in cattle. Comparison of the 50% protective dose and the protection against generalization.
    Vianna Filho YL; Astudillo V; Gomes I; Fernández G; Rozas CE; Ravison JA; Alonso A
    Vaccine; 1993 Nov; 11(14):1424-8. PubMed ID: 8310761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease.
    Morgan DO; Moore DM; McKercher PD
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1980; 47():169-78. PubMed ID: 6259663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficiency testing of foot--and--mouth disease vaccines prepared from strain "C" with different adjuvants.
    Sólyom F; Fazekas A; Czelleng F; Makár A; Roith J
    Dev Biol Stand; 1976; 35():113-5. PubMed ID: 198276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimisation of the immune response to foot-and-mouth disease vaccines.
    Doel TR
    Vaccine; 1999 Mar; 17(13-14):1767-71. PubMed ID: 10194837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Combined vaccines including 1 or several anti-foot-and-mouth valences].
    Fontaine J; Favre H; Valette L; Précausta P; Roulet C; Brun A; Terré J
    Dev Biol Stand; 1976; 35():395-407. PubMed ID: 198308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dose-response evaluation of a genetically engineered foot-and-mouth disease virus polypeptide immunogen in cattle.
    McKercher PD; Moore DM; Morgan DO; Robertson BH; Callis JJ; Kleid DG; Shire SJ; Yansura DG; Dowbenko D; Small B
    Am J Vet Res; 1985 Mar; 46(3):587-90. PubMed ID: 2986495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [On several tests of the value of saponin used alone as an adjuvant in the preparation of foot-and-mouth disease vaccine].
    Bayramoglu O; Unlublebici N; Girard HC
    Bull Acad Vet Fr; 1967 Jun; 40(6):283-6. PubMed ID: 4305068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Foot-and-mouth disease vaccine potency testing: the influence of serotype, type of adjuvant, valency, fractionation method, and virus culture on the dose-response curve in cattle.
    Jamal SM; Bouma A; van den Broek J; Stegeman A; Chénard G; Dekker A
    Vaccine; 2008 Nov; 26(50):6317-21. PubMed ID: 18822336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proceedings: Quantitative assay of the immunizing dose of monovalent vaccines against foot-and-mouth disease prepared from the virus propagated on cattle tongue mucosa and in culture after Frenkel.
    Wiśniewski J; Kobusiewicz T; Szkilnik S; Baranowski C; Jankowska J; Labecka W
    Acta Microbiol Pol A; 1974; 6(1):131. PubMed ID: 4364054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Neutralizing and protecting antibodies in the serum cattle vaccinated against foot and mouth disease].
    Brunengo AM; Díaz Primerano AM; Peso OA
    Rev Asoc Argent Microbiol; 1977; 9(3):115-25. PubMed ID: 208108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Foot and mouth disease vaccine potency tests in cattle: the interrelationship of antigen dose, serum neutralizing antibody response and protection from challenge.
    Pay TW; Hingley PJ
    Vaccine; 1992; 10(10):699-706. PubMed ID: 1326146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Immune response of steers inoculated with chemically-treated foot-and-mouth disease virus preparations previously studied in swine.
    McKercher PD; Giordano AR
    Arch Gesamte Virusforsch; 1967; 20(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 4299724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.