These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19659451)

  • 1. Relevance of risk predictions derived from a chronic species sensitivity distribution with cadmium to aquatic populations and ecosystems.
    Mebane CA
    Risk Anal; 2010 Feb; 30(2):203-23. PubMed ID: 19659451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing aquatic risk assessment methods for the photosynthesis-inhibiting herbicides metribuzin and metamitron.
    Brock TC; Crum SJ; Deneer JW; Heimbach F; Roijackers RM; Sinkeldam JA
    Environ Pollut; 2004 Aug; 130(3):403-26. PubMed ID: 15182972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do we have to incorporate ecological interactions in the sensitivity assessment of ecosystems? An examination of a theoretical assumption underlying species sensitivity distribution models.
    De Laender F; De Schamphelaere KA; Vanrolleghem PA; Janssen CR
    Environ Int; 2008 Apr; 34(3):390-6. PubMed ID: 17977598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The species sensitivity distribution approach compared to a microcosm study: a case study with the fungicide fluazinam.
    van Wijngaarden RP; Arts GH; Belgers JD; Boonstra H; Roessink I; Schroer AF; Brock TC
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2010 Feb; 73(2):109-22. PubMed ID: 19837458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Confirming the species-sensitivity distribution concept for endosulfan using laboratory, mesocosm, and field data.
    Hose GC; Van den Brink PJ
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2004 Nov; 47(4):511-20. PubMed ID: 15499502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methods for deriving pesticide aquatic life criteria.
    TenBrook PL; Tjeerdema RS; Hann P; Karkoski J
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2009; 199():19-109. PubMed ID: 19110939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bioconcentration, bioaccumulation, and metabolism of pesticides in aquatic organisms.
    Katagi T
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2010; 204():1-132. PubMed ID: 19957234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of in silico development of aquatic toxicity species sensitivity distributions.
    Barron MG; Jackson CR; Awkerman JA
    Aquat Toxicol; 2012 Jul; 116-117():1-7. PubMed ID: 22459408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Derivation of guideline values for gold (III) ion toxicity limits to protect aquatic ecosystems.
    Nam SH; Lee WM; Shin YJ; Yoon SJ; Kim SW; Kwak JI; An YJ
    Water Res; 2014 Jan; 48():126-36. PubMed ID: 24094731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biotransference and biomagnification of selenium copper, cadmium, zinc, arsenic and lead in a temperate seagrass ecosystem from Lake Macquarie Estuary, NSW, Australia.
    Barwick M; Maher W
    Mar Environ Res; 2003 Oct; 56(4):471-502. PubMed ID: 12860434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Insecticide species sensitivity distributions: importance of test species selection and relevance to aquatic ecosystems.
    Maltby L; Blake N; Brock TC; van den Brink PJ
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2005 Feb; 24(2):379-88. PubMed ID: 15719998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acute toxicity value extrapolation with fish and aquatic invertebrates.
    Buckler DR; Mayer FL; Ellersieck MR; Asfaw A
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2005 Nov; 49(4):546-58. PubMed ID: 16205993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of environmental risks from toxic and nontoxic stressors; a proposed concept for a risk-based management tool for offshore drilling discharges.
    Smit MG; Jak RG; Rye H; Frost TK; Singsaas I; Karman CC
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2008 Apr; 4(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 18232721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of aquatic toxicity benchmarks for oil products using species sensitivity distributions.
    Barron MG; Hemmer MJ; Jackson CR
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Oct; 9(4):610-5. PubMed ID: 23554001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of an ecosystem modelling approach as a tool for ecological effect assessments.
    De Laender F; De Schamphelaere KA; Vanrolleghem PA; Janssen CR
    Chemosphere; 2008 Mar; 71(3):529-45. PubMed ID: 18031787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving ecological risk assessment by including bioavailability into species sensitivity distributions: an example for plants exposed to nickel in soil.
    Semenzin E; Temminghoff EJ; Marcomini A
    Environ Pollut; 2007 Jul; 148(2):642-7. PubMed ID: 17240027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aquatic risk assessment of herbicides in freshwater ecosystems of South Florida.
    Schuler LJ; Rand GM
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2008 May; 54(4):571-83. PubMed ID: 18094912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Environmental concentrations and aquatic toxicity data on diflubenzuron (dimilin).
    Fischer SA; Hall LW
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 1992; 22(1):45-79. PubMed ID: 1616600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genotoxicity of 1,3-butadiene and its epoxy intermediates.
    Walker VE; Walker DM; Meng Q; McDonald JD; Scott BR; Seilkop SK; Claffey DJ; Upton PB; Powley MW; Swenberg JA; Henderson RF;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Aug; (144):3-79. PubMed ID: 20017413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.