These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19659489)

  • 1. A multi-method analysis of free-text comments from the UK General Medical Council Colleague Questionnaires.
    Richards SH; Campbell JL; Walshaw E; Dickens A; Greco M
    Med Educ; 2009 Aug; 43(8):757-66. PubMed ID: 19659489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the professional performance of UK doctors: an evaluation of the utility of the General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires.
    Campbell JL; Richards SH; Dickens A; Greco M; Narayanan A; Brearley S
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2008 Jun; 17(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 18519625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multisource feedback in evaluating the performance of doctors: the example of the UK General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires.
    Wright C; Richards SH; Hill JJ; Roberts MJ; Norman GR; Greco M; Taylor MR; Campbell JL
    Acad Med; 2012 Dec; 87(12):1668-78. PubMed ID: 23095930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms Can Classify Open-Text Feedback of Doctor Performance With Human-Level Accuracy.
    Gibbons C; Richards S; Valderas JM; Campbell J
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Mar; 19(3):e65. PubMed ID: 28298265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Self-other agreement in multisource feedback: the influence of doctor and rater group characteristics.
    Roberts MJ; Campbell JL; Richards SH; Wright C
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2013; 33(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 23512556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors associated with variability in the assessment of UK doctors' professionalism: analysis of survey results.
    Campbell JL; Roberts M; Wright C; Hill J; Greco M; Taylor M; Richards S
    BMJ; 2011 Oct; 343():d6212. PubMed ID: 22034193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multisource feedback questionnaires in appraisal and for revalidation: a qualitative study in UK general practice.
    Hill JJ; Asprey A; Richards SH; Campbell JL
    Br J Gen Pract; 2012 May; 62(598):e314-21. PubMed ID: 22546590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does the method of administration influence the UK GMC patient questionnaire ratings?
    Richards SH; Campbell JL; Dickens A
    Prim Health Care Res Dev; 2011 Jan; 12(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 21426616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using a 'peer assessment questionnaire' in primary medical care.
    Elwyn G; Lewis M; Evans R; Hutchings H
    Br J Gen Pract; 2005 Sep; 55(518):690-5. PubMed ID: 16176736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of a multi-source feedback tool for use in general practice.
    Campbell J; Narayanan A; Burford B; Greco M
    Educ Prim Care; 2010 May; 21(3):165-79. PubMed ID: 20515545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Commentary: the role of appraisal and multisource feedback in the UK General Medical Council's new revalidation system.
    Rubin P
    Acad Med; 2012 Dec; 87(12):1654-6. PubMed ID: 23187912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Duties of a doctor: UK doctors and good medical practice.
    McManus IC; Gordon D; Winder BC
    Qual Health Care; 2000 Mar; 9(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 10848365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of revalidation on appraisal in primary care: an initial evaluation of the experience of Welsh GPs.
    Williams S; Holmes S; Laugharne K
    Educ Prim Care; 2016 Mar; 27(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 27005839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identifying attributes required by Foundation Year 1 doctors in multidisciplinary teams: a tool for performance evaluation.
    McGettigan P; McKendree J; Reed N; Holborow S; Walsh CD; Mace T
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2013 Mar; 22(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 23362506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The United Kingdom's experience with and future plans for revalidation.
    Archer J; de Bere SR
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2013; 33 Suppl 1():S48-53. PubMed ID: 24347152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implementing workplace-based assessment across the medical specialties in the United Kingdom.
    Wilkinson JR; Crossley JG; Wragg A; Mills P; Cowan G; Wade W
    Med Educ; 2008 Apr; 42(4):364-73. PubMed ID: 18338989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interpreting multisource feedback: online study of consensus and variation among GP appraisers.
    Wright C; Campbell J; McGowan L; Roberts MJ; Jelley D; Chatterjee A
    Br J Gen Pract; 2016 Apr; 66(645):e277-84. PubMed ID: 26965027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Working as a doctor when acutely ill: comments made by doctors responding to United Kingdom surveys.
    Smith F; Goldacre MJ; Lambert TW
    JRSM Open; 2016 Apr; 7(4):2054270416635035. PubMed ID: 27066264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. GP appraisal: an evaluation of generational differences on the utility of GP appraisal.
    Hopayian K; Sherifi J
    Educ Prim Care; 2020 Nov; 31(6):371-376. PubMed ID: 32862790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Revalidation - a personal reflection.
    Dawda P
    Aust Fam Physician; 2013 Nov; 42(11):826-8. PubMed ID: 24217109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.