These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19659686)

  • 1. Identifying conservation areas on the basis of alternative distribution data sets.
    Underwood JG; D'Agrosa C; Gerber LR
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Feb; 24(1):162-70. PubMed ID: 19659686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tradeoffs of different types of species occurrence data for use in systematic conservation planning.
    Rondinini C; Wilson KA; Boitani L; Grantham H; Possingham HP
    Ecol Lett; 2006 Oct; 9(10):1136-45. PubMed ID: 16972877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of incremental reserve design and changing reservation goals on the long-term efficiency of reserve systems.
    Stewart RR; Ball IR; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Apr; 21(2):346-54. PubMed ID: 17391185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biased data reduce efficiency and effectiveness of conservation reserve networks.
    Grand J; Cummings MP; Rebelo TG; Ricketts TH; Neel MC
    Ecol Lett; 2007 May; 10(5):364-74. PubMed ID: 17498135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reserve networks based on richness hotspots and representation vary with scale.
    Shriner SA; Wilson KR; Flather CH
    Ecol Appl; 2006 Oct; 16(5):1660-73. PubMed ID: 17069361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Uncertainty analysis for regional-scale reserve selection.
    Moilanen A; Wintle BA; Elith J; Burgman M
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Dec; 20(6):1688-97. PubMed ID: 17181804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of representation targets on the total area of conservation-area networks.
    Justus J; Fuller T; Sarkar S
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Jun; 22(3):673-82. PubMed ID: 18445075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A probabilistic model of reserve design.
    Bascompte J; Luque B; Olarrea J; Lacasa L
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Jul; 247(1):205-11. PubMed ID: 17418238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic conservation planning.
    Margules CR; Pressey RL
    Nature; 2000 May; 405(6783):243-53. PubMed ID: 10821285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conservation goals and the relative importance of costs and benefits in reserve selection.
    Perhans K; Kindstrand C; Boman M; Djupström LB; Gustafsson L; Mattsson L; Schroeder LM; Weslien J; Wikberg S
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Oct; 22(5):1331-9. PubMed ID: 18637912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How to resolve the SLOSS debate: lessons from species-diversity models.
    Tjørve E
    J Theor Biol; 2010 May; 264(2):604-12. PubMed ID: 20152842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new method for conservation planning for the persistence of multiple species.
    Nicholson E; Westphal MI; Frank K; Rochester WA; Pressey RL; Lindenmayer DB; Possingham HP
    Ecol Lett; 2006 Sep; 9(9):1049-60. PubMed ID: 16925654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptions and attitudes of land managers in multi-tenure reserve networks and the implications for conservation.
    Fitzsimons JA; Wescott G
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Jul; 84(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 16904814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Integrating environmental gap analysis with spatial conservation prioritization: a case study from Victoria, Australia.
    Sharafi SM; Moilanen A; White M; Burgman M
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Dec; 112():240-51. PubMed ID: 22935646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An index of risk as a measure of biodiversity conservation achieved through land reform.
    Walker S; Price R; Stephens RT
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Feb; 22(1):48-59. PubMed ID: 18254852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of inverse spatial conservation prioritization to avoid biological diversity loss outside protected areas.
    Kareksela S; Moilanen A; Tuominen S; Kotiaho JS
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1294-303. PubMed ID: 24033397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity.
    Rodrigues AS; Andelman SJ; Bakarr MI; Boitani L; Brooks TM; Cowling RM; Fishpool LD; Da Fonseca GA; Gaston KJ; Hoffmann M; Long JS; Marquet PA; Pilgrim JD; Pressey RL; Schipper J; Sechrest W; Stuart SN; Underhill LG; Waller RW; Watts ME; Yan X
    Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6983):640-3. PubMed ID: 15071592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of connectivity and spatial resolution of analyses on conservation prioritization across large extents.
    Arponen A; Lehtomäki J; Leppänen J; Tomppo E; Moilanen A
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Apr; 26(2):294-304. PubMed ID: 22268786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficiency and concordance of alternative methods for minimizing opportunity costs in conservation planning.
    Cameron SE; Williams KJ; Mitchell DK
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Aug; 22(4):886-96. PubMed ID: 18637906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A review of the relationships between human population density and biodiversity.
    Luck GW
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2007 Nov; 82(4):607-45. PubMed ID: 17944620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.