112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19660755)
1. Implementation and validation of an implant-based coordinate system for RSA migration calculation.
Laende EK; Deluzio KJ; Hennigar AW; Dunbar MJ
J Biomech; 2009 Oct; 42(14):2387-93. PubMed ID: 19660755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new model-based RSA method validated using CAD models and models from reversed engineering.
Kaptein BL; Valstar ER; Stoel BC; Rozing PM; Reiber JH
J Biomech; 2003 Jun; 36(6):873-82. PubMed ID: 12742455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of three pose estimation algorithms for model-based roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis.
Kaptein BL; Valstar ER; Stoel BC; Rozing PM; Reiber JH
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2004; 218(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 15376725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Skeletal landmarks for TKR implantations: evaluation of their accuracy using EOS imaging acquisition system.
Schlatterer B; Suedhoff I; Bonnet X; Catonne Y; Maestro M; Skalli W
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Feb; 95(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 19251231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental analysis of Model-Based Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (MBRSA) on four typical prosthesis components.
Seehaus F; Emmerich J; Kaptein BL; Windhagen H; Hurschler C
J Biomech Eng; 2009 Apr; 131(4):041004. PubMed ID: 19275433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How Do Classic (Static) RSA and Patient Motion Artifacts Affect the Assessment of Migration of a TKA Tibial Component? An In Vitro Study.
Cao H; Sesselmann S; Xu J; Seehaus F; Forst R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Feb; 481(2):400-412. PubMed ID: 36398327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Markerless Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis for in vivo implant migration measurement using three dimensional surface models to represent bone.
Seehaus F; Olender GD; Kaptein BL; Ostermeier S; Hurschler C
J Biomech; 2012 May; 45(8):1540-5. PubMed ID: 22465625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated image registration for assessing three-dimensional alignment of entire lower extremity and implant position using bi-plane radiography.
Kobayashi K; Sakamoto M; Tanabe Y; Ariumi A; Sato T; Omori G; Koga Y
J Biomech; 2009 Dec; 42(16):2818-22. PubMed ID: 19766224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Precision assessment of model-based RSA for a total knee prosthesis in a biplanar set-up.
Trozzi C; Kaptein BL; Garling EH; Shelyakova T; Russo A; Bragonzoni L; Martelli S
Knee; 2008 Oct; 15(5):396-402. PubMed ID: 18635360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An optimized image matching method for determining in-vivo TKA kinematics with a dual-orthogonal fluoroscopic imaging system.
Bingham J; Li G
J Biomech Eng; 2006 Aug; 128(4):588-95. PubMed ID: 16813450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy evaluation of fluoroscopy-based 2D and 3D pose reconstruction with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Van Duren BH; Pandit H; Beard DJ; Murray DW; Gill HS
Med Eng Phys; 2009 Apr; 31(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 18606555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Verifying a C-arm-based roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis protocol for assessing tibial implant movement in total knee arthroplasty.
Chung VWJ; Newell R; Kedgley A; Anglin C; Masri BA; Hodgson AJ
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2022 Aug; 60(8):2389-2403. PubMed ID: 35764909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional computer simulation of radiostereometric analysis (RSA) in distal radius fractures.
Madanat R; Moritz N; Aro HT
J Biomech; 2007; 40(8):1855-61. PubMed ID: 17034797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The accuracy of acquisition of an imageless computer-assisted system and its implication for knee arthroplasty.
Lustig S; Fleury C; Goy D; Neyret P; Donell ST
Knee; 2011 Jan; 18(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 20060724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A robust method for registration of three-dimensional knee implant models to two-dimensional fluoroscopy images.
Mahfouz MR; Hoff WA; Komistek RD; Dennis DA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Dec; 22(12):1561-74. PubMed ID: 14649746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation for the effect of intra-exposure patient motion on the assessment of radiostereometric implant migration in a tibial component phantom study.
Cao H; Zheng T; Jin Z
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2024 Apr; 110(2):103776. PubMed ID: 38016580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of knee implants sizing predicted by digital images.
Wongsak S; Kawinwonggowit V; Mulpruck P; Channoom T; Woratanarat P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S85-90. PubMed ID: 20128074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Knee joint kinematics, fixation and function related to joint area design in total knee arthroplasty.
Uvehammer J
Acta Orthop Scand Suppl; 2001 Feb; 72(299):1-52. PubMed ID: 11381581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determination of the position and orientation of artificial knee implants using markers embedded in a bone: preliminary in vitro experiments.
Imai S; Higashijima K; Ishida A; Fukuoka Y; Hoshino A; Minamitani H
Med Eng Phys; 2003 Jun; 25(5):419-24. PubMed ID: 12711240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improvement of depth position in 2-D/3-D registration of knee implants using single-plane fluoroscopy.
Yamazaki T; Watanabe T; Nakajima Y; Sugamoto K; Tomita T; Yoshikawa H; Tamura S
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 May; 23(5):602-12. PubMed ID: 15147013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
