279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19661817)
1. Biopsy specimens obtained with small-caliber endoscopes have comparable diagnostic performances than those obtained with conventional endoscopes: a prospective study on 1335 specimens.
Walter T; Chesnay AL; Dumortier J; Mège-LeChevallier F; Hervieu V; Guillaud O; Lapalus MG; Lépilliez V; Fumex F; Ponchon T; Scoazec JY
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2010 Jan; 44(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 19661817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized trial of unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus peroral small-caliber EGD versus conventional EGD.
Preiss C; Charton JP; Schumacher B; Neuhaus H
Endoscopy; 2003 Aug; 35(8):641-6. PubMed ID: 12929057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does a small biopsied gastric specimen limit the usage of two directional transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy?
Rhee KH; Han HS; Lee SY; Seo TH; Ko SY; Kim BK; Sung IK; Jin CJ; Min YI
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 Feb; 25(2):270-6. PubMed ID: 19968748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective evaluation of a new ultrathin one-plane bending videoendoscope for transnasal EGD: a comparative study on performance and tolerance.
Dumortier J; Josso C; Roman S; Fumex F; Lepilliez V; Prost B; Lot M; Guillaud O; Petit-Laurent F; Lapalus MG; Ponchon T
Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Jul; 66(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 17591468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and interobserver agreement of small-caliber vs. conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy for evaluating esophageal varices.
Pungpapong S; Keaveny A; Raimondo M; Dickson R; Woodward T; Harnois D; Wallace M
Endoscopy; 2007 Aug; 39(8):673-80. PubMed ID: 17583856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective randomized comparative study on the safety and tolerability of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Yagi J; Adachi K; Arima N; Tanaka S; Ose T; Azumi T; Sasaki H; Sato M; Kinoshita Y
Endoscopy; 2005 Dec; 37(12):1226-31. PubMed ID: 16329022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unsedated ultrathin upper endoscopy is better than conventional endoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: a randomized trial.
Trevisani L; Cifalà V; Sartori S; Gilli G; Matarese G; Abbasciano V
World J Gastroenterol; 2007 Feb; 13(6):906-11. PubMed ID: 17352021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Prospective study comparing conventional and transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy for routine diagnosis].
Krakamp B; Parusel M; Saers T
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2004 Jan; 129(3):82-6. PubMed ID: 14724781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unsedated transnasal versus transoral sedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a one-series prospective study on safety and patient acceptability.
Stroppa I; Grasso E; Paoluzi OA; Razzini C; Tosti C; Andrei F; Biancone L; Palmieri G; Romeo F; Pallone F
Dig Liver Dis; 2008 Sep; 40(9):767-75. PubMed ID: 18424197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective comparison of performance of biopsy forceps used in single passage with multiple bites during upper endoscopy.
Chu KM; Yuen ST; Wong WM; Wong KW; Lai KC; Hu WH; Leung SY; Yuen MF; Lam SK; Wong BC
Endoscopy; 2003 Apr; 35(4):338-42. PubMed ID: 12664392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Disposable endoscopic biopsy forceps: comparison with standard forceps of sample size and adequacy of specimen.
Turk DJ; Kozarek RA; Botoman VA; Patterson DJ; Ball TJ
J Clin Gastroenterol; 1991 Feb; 13(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 2007750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Self-training in unsedated transnasal EGD by endoscopists competent in standard peroral EGD: prospective assessment of the learning curve.
Maffei M; Dumortier J; Dumonceau JM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Mar; 67(3):410-8. PubMed ID: 18155215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Technical aspects in endoscopic biopsy of lesions in esophageal pemphigus vulgaris.
Galloro G; Diamantis G; Magno L; Inzirillo M; Mignogna MC; Mignogna C; De Rosa G; Iovino P
Dig Liver Dis; 2007 Apr; 39(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 17307037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility and tolerance of 2-way and 4-way angulation videoscopes for unsedated patients undergoing transnasal EGD in GI cancer screening.
Tatsumi Y; Harada A; Matsumoto T; Tani T; Nishida H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Jun; 67(7):1021-7. PubMed ID: 18279865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of thin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Wilkins T; Brewster A; Lammers J
J Fam Pract; 2002 Jul; 51(7):625-9. PubMed ID: 12160501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Unsedated transnasal endoscopy: a new technique for accurately detecting and grading esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients.
Saeian K; Staff D; Knox J; Binion D; Townsend W; Dua K; Shaker R
Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 Sep; 97(9):2246-9. PubMed ID: 12358240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can the 1.8 mm transnasal biopsy forceps instead of standard 2.2 mm alter rapid urease test and histological diagnosis?
Jeon SJ; Shin SJ; Lee KM; Lim SK; Lee YC; Lee MH; Hwang JC; Cheong JY; Yoo BM; Kim JH
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Aug; 27(8):1384-7. PubMed ID: 22497665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of transnasal small-caliber vs. peroral conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy for evaluating varices in unsedated cirrhotic patients.
Choe WH; Kim JH; Ko SY; Kwon SY; Kim BK; Rhee KH; Seo TH; Lee TY; Hong SN; Lee SY; Sung IK; Park HS; Shim CS
Endoscopy; 2011 Aug; 43(8):649-56. PubMed ID: 21660907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unsedated transnasal percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement in selected patients.
Vitale MA; Villotti G; D'Alba L; De Cesare MA; Frontespezi S; Iacopini G
Endoscopy; 2005 Jan; 37(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 15657858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective evaluation of a 3.1-mm battery-powered esophagoscope in screening for esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients.
Madhotra R; Mokhashi M; Willner I; Hawes RH; Reuben A
Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Apr; 98(4):807-12. PubMed ID: 12738460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
