483 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19663958)
1. Clinical outcomes of GBR procedures to correct peri-implant dehiscences and fenestrations: a systematic review.
Chiapasco M; Zaniboni M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 4():113-23. PubMed ID: 19663958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Five-year evaluation of implants placed at extraction and with dehiscences and fenestration defects augmented with ePTFE membranes: results from a prospective multicenter study.
Becker W; Dahlin C; Lekholm U; Bergstrom C; van Steenberghe D; Higuchi K; Becker BE
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 1999; 1(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 11359308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Guided bone regeneration around endosseous implants with anorganic bovine bone mineral. A randomized controlled trial comparing bioabsorbable versus non-resorbable barriers.
Carpio L; Loza J; Lynch S; Genco R
J Periodontol; 2000 Nov; 71(11):1743-9. PubMed ID: 11128923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized controlled clinical multicenter trial comparing the clinical and histological performance of a new, modified polylactide-co-glycolide acid membrane to an expanded polytetrafluorethylene membrane in guided bone regeneration procedures.
Schneider D; Weber FE; Grunder U; Andreoni C; Burkhardt R; Jung RE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 23432666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bone augmentation at implant dehiscences and fenestrations. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
Merli M; Merli I; Raffaelli E; Pagliaro U; Nastri L; Nieri M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(1):11-32. PubMed ID: 27022634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing small buccal dehiscence defects around dental implants treated with guided bone regeneration or left for spontaneous healing.
Jung RE; Herzog M; Wolleb K; Ramel CF; Thoma DS; Hämmerle CH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Mar; 28(3):348-354. PubMed ID: 26923088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading.
Urban IA; Jovanovic SA; Lozada JL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):502-10. PubMed ID: 19587874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implant treatment choice after extraction of a vertically fractured tooth. A proposal for a clinical classification of bony defects based on a systematic review of literature.
Corbella S; Taschieri S; Samaranayake L; Tsesis I; Nemcovsky C; Del Fabbro M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Aug; 25(8):946-56. PubMed ID: 23560723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A one-stage approach for nonsubmerged implants using a xenograft in narrow ridges: report on seven cases.
De Boever AL; De Boever JA
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Apr; 23(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 12710820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of a new cross-linked collagen membrane for the treatment of peri-implant dehiscence defects: a randomised controlled double-blinded clinical trial.
Annen BM; Ramel CF; Hämmerle CH; Jung RE
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2011; 4(2):87-100. PubMed ID: 21808759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non-resorbable membranes after 12-14 years.
Jung RE; Fenner N; Hämmerle CH; Zitzmann NU
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1065-73. PubMed ID: 22697628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of lyodura for bone augmentation of osseous defects around dental implants.
Peleg M; Chaushu G; Blinder D; Taicher S
J Periodontol; 1999 Aug; 70(8):853-60. PubMed ID: 10476892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ridge expansion alone or in combination with guided bone regeneration to facilitate implant placement in narrow alveolar ridges: a retrospective study.
Tang YL; Yuan J; Song YL; Ma W; Chao X; Li DH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Feb; 26(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 24330035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of regenerated buccal bone 5 years after simultaneous implant placement and guided bone regeneration procedures--a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
Jung RE; Benic GI; Scherrer D; Hämmerle CH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 24299007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment of dehiscences and fenestrations around dental implants using resorbable and nonresorbable membranes associated with bone autografts: a comparative clinical study.
Simion M; Misitano U; Gionso L; Salvato A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 9109265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical and radiographic evaluation, following delivery of fixed reconstructions, at GBR treated titanium fixtures.
Mayfield L; Skoglund A; Nobréus N; Attström R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1998 Oct; 9(5):292-302. PubMed ID: 9835808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement?
Aghaloo TL; Moy PK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22 Suppl():49-70. PubMed ID: 18437791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative analysis of collagen membranes for the treatment of implant dehiscence defects.
Oh TJ; Meraw SJ; Lee EJ; Giannobile WV; Wang HL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Feb; 14(1):80-90. PubMed ID: 12562369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Bioresorbable barrier membranes for guided bone regeneration around dental implants].
Kohal RJ; Hürzeler MB
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2002; 112(12):1222-9. PubMed ID: 12585214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis vs. vertical guided bone regeneration for the correction of vertically deficient edentulous ridges: a 1-3-year prospective study on humans.
Chiapasco M; Romeo E; Casentini P; Rimondini L
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Feb; 15(1):82-95. PubMed ID: 14731181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
