These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19664046)

  • 1. A wet/wet differential pressure sensor for measuring vertical hydraulic gradient.
    Fritz BG; Mackley RD
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 19664046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A wet/wet differential pressure sensor for measuring vertical hydraulic gradient.
    Cuthbert MO; Greswell RB; Mackay R
    Ground Water; 2011; 49(6):781-2; discussion 782. PubMed ID: 22023693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of tandem circulation wells to measure hydraulic conductivity without groundwater extraction.
    Goltz MN; Huang J; Close ME; Flintoft MJ; Pang L
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Sep; 100(3-4):127-36. PubMed ID: 18674844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uniform head in horizontal and vertical wells.
    Steward DR; Jin W
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 16405471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurements of groundwater velocity in discrete rock fractures.
    Novakowski K; Bickerton G; Lapcevic P; Voralek J; Ross N
    J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Jan; 82(1-2):44-60. PubMed ID: 16239047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of an electronic seepage chamber for extended use in a river.
    Fritz BG; Mendoza DP; Gilmore TJ
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(1):136-40. PubMed ID: 18793205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of rapidly changing river stage on uranium flux through the hyporheic zone.
    Fritz BG; Arntzen EV
    Ground Water; 2007; 45(6):753-60. PubMed ID: 17973753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Local hydraulic gradient estimator analysis of long-term monitoring networks.
    McKenna SA; Wahi A
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(5):723-31. PubMed ID: 16961494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterizing hydraulic conductivity with the direct-push permeameter.
    Butler JJ; Dietrich P; Wittig V; Christy T
    Ground Water; 2007; 45(4):409-19. PubMed ID: 17600571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of measurement error on horizontal hydraulic gradient estimates.
    Devlin JF; McElwee CD
    Ground Water; 2007; 45(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 17257340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of groundwater flow patterns around a dual-screened groundwater circulation well.
    Johnson RL; Simon MA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Aug; 93(1-4):188-202. PubMed ID: 17428573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigating groundwater-lake interactions by hydraulic heads and a water balance.
    Rudnick S; Lewandowski J; Nützmann G
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(2):227-37. PubMed ID: 24854019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring the hydraulic conductivity of shallow submerged sediments.
    Kelly SE; Murdoch LC
    Ground Water; 2003; 41(4):431-9. PubMed ID: 12873006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A falling-head method for measuring intertidal sediment hydraulic conductivity.
    Li H; Sun P; Chen S; Xia Y; Liu S
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 19824904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A forward modeling approach for interpreting impeller flow logs.
    Parker AH; West LJ; Odling NE; Bown RT
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 19650812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new sampler to assess dermal exposure during wet working.
    Cherrie JW; Apsley A; Semple S
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Jan; 51(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 16984947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Numerical modeling of saline water transport in the lower Nam Kam Basin, Amphoe That Phanom, Changwat Nakhon Phanom, Thailand.
    Srisuk K; Sriboonlue V; Buaphan C; Archvichai L; Youngme W; Satarak P; Jaruchaikul S
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(7):157-64. PubMed ID: 11724482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling surface water-groundwater interaction with MODFLOW: some considerations.
    Brunner P; Simmons CT; Cook PG; Therrien R
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 19891721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of combined direct-push methods used for aquifer model generation.
    Köber R; Hornbruch G; Leven C; Tischer L; Grossmann J; Dietrich P; Weiss H; Dahmke A
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(4):536-46. PubMed ID: 19341375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analytic element modeling of embedded multiaquifer domains.
    Bakker M
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 16405470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.