These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19664048)

  • 1. Calibration of parameter fields consisting of multiple statistical populations.
    Janssen GM; Valstar JR
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(1):92-105. PubMed ID: 19664048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Latin hypercube approach to estimate uncertainty in ground water vulnerability.
    Gurdak JJ; McCray JE; Thyne G; Qi SL
    Ground Water; 2007; 45(3):348-61. PubMed ID: 17470124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An investigation of numerical grid effects in parameter estimation.
    Zyvoloski GA; Vesselinov VV
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(6):814-25. PubMed ID: 17087753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new statistical framework for parameter subset selection and optimal parameter estimation in the activated sludge model.
    Kim YS; Kim MH; Yoo CK
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 Nov; 183(1-3):441-7. PubMed ID: 20702037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An objective test of stochastic behavior in riverine water quality models.
    Parker GT; Droste RL; Rennie CD
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 19151498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A benchmark methodology for managing uncertainties in urban runoff quality models.
    Kanso A; Tassin B; Chebbo G
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(2):163-70. PubMed ID: 15790240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An inverse system for incorporation of conditioning to pressure and streamline-based calibration.
    Jang M; Choe J
    J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Mar; 69(1-2):139-56. PubMed ID: 14972441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Model uncertainty--parameter uncertainty versus conceptual models.
    Højberg AL; Refsgaard JC
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(6):177-86. PubMed ID: 16304950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimization of measurement campaigns for calibration of a conceptual sewer model.
    Kleidorfer M; Möderl M; Fach S; Rauch W
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(8):1523-30. PubMed ID: 19403965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a fuzzy-stochastic nonlinear model to incorporate aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty.
    Li H; Zhang K
    J Contam Hydrol; 2010 Jan; 111(1-4):1-12. PubMed ID: 19945767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are models too simple? Arguments for increased parameterization.
    Hunt RJ; Doherty J; Tonkin MJ
    Ground Water; 2007; 45(3):254-62. PubMed ID: 17470114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of parameter uncertainty of a flow and quality stormwater model.
    Dotto CB; Deletic A; Fletcher TD
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(3):717-25. PubMed ID: 19657167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scale effects of hydrostratigraphy and recharge zonation on base flow.
    Juckem PF; Hunt RJ; Anderson MP
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(3):362-70. PubMed ID: 16681517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A review of model applications for structured soils: b) Pesticide transport.
    Köhne JM; Köhne S; Simůnek J
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Feb; 104(1-4):36-60. PubMed ID: 19012993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian approach for the calibration of models: application to an urban stormwater pollution model.
    Kanso A; Gromaire MC; Gaume E; Tassin B; Chebbo G
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(4):77-84. PubMed ID: 12666804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An efficient approach to automate the manual trial and error calibration of activated sludge models.
    Sin G; De Pauw DJ; Weijers S; Vanrolleghem PA
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2008 Jun; 100(3):516-28. PubMed ID: 18098316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ground water model calibration using pilot points and regularization.
    Doherty J
    Ground Water; 2003; 41(2):170-7. PubMed ID: 12656283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How uncertain is model-based prediction of copper loads in stormwater runoff?
    Lindblom E; Ahlman S; Mikkelsen PS
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(11):65-72. PubMed ID: 18057643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating recharge rates with analytic element models and parameter estimation.
    Dripps WR; Hunt RJ; Anderson MP
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 16405465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The value of subsidence data in ground water model calibration.
    Yan T; Burbey TJ
    Ground Water; 2008; 46(4):538-50. PubMed ID: 18384595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.