These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19664428)

  • 1. Comparison of manual vs. speech-based interaction with in-vehicle information systems.
    Maciej J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2009 Sep; 41(5):924-30. PubMed ID: 19664428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects on driving performance of interacting with an in-vehicle music player: a comparison of three interface layout concepts for information presentation.
    Mitsopoulos-Rubens E; Trotter MJ; Lenné MG
    Appl Ergon; 2011 May; 42(4):583-91. PubMed ID: 20869694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combining cognitive and visual distraction: less than the sum of its parts.
    Liang Y; Lee JD
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 May; 42(3):881-90. PubMed ID: 20380916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Texting while driving: is speech-based text entry less risky than handheld text entry?
    He J; Chaparro A; Nguyen B; Burge RJ; Crandall J; Chaparro B; Ni R; Cao S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Nov; 72():287-95. PubMed ID: 25089769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitivity of the lane change test as a measure of in-vehicle system demand.
    Young KL; Lenné MG; Williamson AR
    Appl Ergon; 2011 May; 42(4):611-8. PubMed ID: 20828672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The validity of driving simulation for assessing differences between in-vehicle informational interfaces: A comparison with field testing.
    Wang Y; Mehler B; Reimer B; Lammers V; D'Ambrosio LA; Coughlin JF
    Ergonomics; 2010 Mar; 53(3):404-20. PubMed ID: 20191415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Driver distraction: the effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance.
    Horberry T; Anderson J; Regan MA; Triggs TJ; Brown J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Jan; 38(1):185-91. PubMed ID: 16226211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing assumptions implicit in the use of the 15-second rule as an early predictor of whether an in-vehicle device produces unacceptable levels of distraction.
    Reed-Jones J; Trick LM; Matthews M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Mar; 40(2):628-34. PubMed ID: 18329415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of in-vehicle tasks and time-gap selection while reclaiming control from adaptive cruise control (ACC) with bus simulator.
    Lin TW; Hwang SL; Su JM; Chen WH
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 May; 40(3):1164-70. PubMed ID: 18460385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Alcohol-related impairment in the Lane Change Task.
    Huemer AK; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Nov; 42(6):1983-8. PubMed ID: 20728652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The implications of cross-regional differences for the design of In-vehicle Information Systems: a comparison of Australian and Chinese drivers.
    Young KL; Rudin-Brown CM; Lenné MG; Williamson AR
    Appl Ergon; 2012 May; 43(3):564-73. PubMed ID: 21944830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Situation awareness and driving performance in a simulated navigation task.
    Ma R; Kaber DB
    Ergonomics; 2007 Aug; 50(8):1351-64. PubMed ID: 17558674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Driving with distraction in Parkinson disease.
    Uc EY; Rizzo M; Anderson SW; Sparks JD; Rodnitzky RL; Dawson JD
    Neurology; 2006 Nov; 67(10):1774-80. PubMed ID: 17130409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Safety implications of providing real-time feedback to distracted drivers.
    Donmez B; Boyle LN; Lee JD
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 May; 39(3):581-90. PubMed ID: 17109807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transfer of computer-based training to simulated driving in older adults.
    Cassavaugh ND; Kramer AF
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Sep; 40(5):943-52. PubMed ID: 19268912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An on-road assessment of cognitive distraction: impacts on drivers' visual behavior and braking performance.
    Harbluk JL; Noy YI; Trbovich PL; Eizenman M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Mar; 39(2):372-9. PubMed ID: 17054894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two visual systems in monitoring of dynamic traffic: effects of visual disruption.
    Zheng XS; McConkie GW
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 May; 42(3):921-8. PubMed ID: 20380921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Time perception as a workload measure in simulated car driving.
    Baldauf D; Burgard E; Wittmann M
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Sep; 40(5):929-35. PubMed ID: 19200943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vigilance monitoring for operator safety: A simulation study on highway driving.
    Desai AV; Haque MA
    J Safety Res; 2006; 37(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 16626742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivity of subjective questionnaires to cognitive loading while driving with navigation aids: a pilot study.
    Smyth CC
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2007 May; 78(5 Suppl):B39-50. PubMed ID: 17547303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.