These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19664814)

  • 1. Spatial language, visual attention, and perceptual simulation.
    Coventry KR; Lynott D; Cangelosi A; Monrouxe L; Joyce D; Richardson DC
    Brain Lang; 2010 Mar; 112(3):202-13. PubMed ID: 19664814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What determines sustained visual attention? The impact of distracter positions, task difficulty and visual fields compared.
    Kraft A; Pape N; Hagendorf H; Schmidt S; Naito A; Brandt SA
    Brain Res; 2007 Feb; 1133(1):123-35. PubMed ID: 17174284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Looking left with left neglect: the role of spatial attention when active vision selects local image features for fixation.
    Ptak R; Golay L; Müri RM; Schnider A
    Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1156-66. PubMed ID: 19038381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Language within your reach: near-far perceptual space and spatial demonstratives.
    Coventry KR; Valdés B; Castillo A; Guijarro-Fuentes P
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):889-95. PubMed ID: 18706538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A dissociation between visual and auditory hemi-inattention: Evidence from temporal order judgements.
    Sinnett S; Juncadella M; Rafal R; Azañón E; Soto-Faraco S
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):552-60. PubMed ID: 16690089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unimodal and crossmodal gradients of spatial attention: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Föcker J; Hötting K; Gondan M; Röder B
    Brain Topogr; 2010 Mar; 23(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 19821021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Time course of auditory masker effects: tapping the locus of audiovisual integration?
    Steenken R; Diederich A; Colonius H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr; 435(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18355963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Language-guided visual processing affects reasoning: the role of referential and spatial anchoring.
    Dumitru ML; Joergensen GH; Cruickshank AG; Altmann GT
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Jun; 22(2):562-71. PubMed ID: 23603423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing.
    He X; Humphreys G; Fan S; Chen L; Han S
    Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():116-25. PubMed ID: 18955038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual load modulates object-based attention.
    Ho MC; Atchley P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1661-9. PubMed ID: 19968427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Action modulates object-based selection.
    Linnell KJ; Humphreys GW; McIntyre DB; Laitinen S; Wing AM
    Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(17):2268-86. PubMed ID: 15924941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The spatial distribution of visual attention.
    Gobell JL; Tseng CH; Sperling G
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1273-96. PubMed ID: 15066391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural mechanisms of spatial- and feature-based attention: a quantitative analysis.
    Stoppel CM; Boehler CN; Sabelhaus C; Heinze HJ; Hopf JM; Schoenfeld MA
    Brain Res; 2007 Nov; 1181():51-60. PubMed ID: 17961522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Time in the mind: using space to think about time.
    Casasanto D; Boroditsky L
    Cognition; 2008 Feb; 106(2):579-93. PubMed ID: 17509553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of gaze-aversion on visual-spatial imagination.
    Markson L; Paterson KB
    Br J Psychol; 2009 Aug; 100(Pt 3):553-63. PubMed ID: 19021925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Seeing fearful body language overcomes attentional deficits in patients with neglect.
    Tamietto M; Geminiani G; Genero R; de Gelder B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Mar; 19(3):445-54. PubMed ID: 17335393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Brief intermittent light stimulation disrupts saccadic oculomotor control.
    Alvarez TL; Beck KD; Ciuffreda KJ; Chua FB; Daftari A; DeMarco RM; Bergen MT; Servatius RJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jul; 28(4):354-64. PubMed ID: 18565091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual and spatial working memory are not that dissociated after all: a time-based resource-sharing account.
    Vergauwe E; Barrouillet P; Camos V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):1012-28. PubMed ID: 19586267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.