These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19665265)

  • 1. Mesenchymal stem cells and inorganic bovine bone mineral in sinus augmentation: comparison with augmentation by autologous bone in adult sheep.
    Gutwald R; Haberstroh J; Kuschnierz J; Kister C; Lysek DA; Maglione M; Xavier SP; Oshima T; Schmelzeisen R; Sauerbier S
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jun; 48(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 19665265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Histomorphometric analysis of natural bone mineral for maxillary sinus augmentation.
    John HD; Wenz B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 15101590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Histologic findings in sinus augmentation with autogenous bone chips versus a bovine bone substitute.
    Schlegel KA; Fichtner G; Schultze-Mosgau S; Wiltfang J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12608669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of mineralized cancellous bone allograft (Puros) and anorganic bovine bone matrix (Bio-Oss) for sinus augmentation: histomorphometry at 26 to 32 weeks after grafting.
    Froum SJ; Wallace SS; Elian N; Cho SC; Tarnow DP
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Dec; 26(6):543-51. PubMed ID: 17243327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sinus floor augmentation using large (1-2 mm) or small (0.25-1 mm) bovine bone mineral particles: a prospective, intra-individual controlled clinical, micro-computerized tomography and histomorphometric study.
    Chackartchi T; Iezzi G; Goldstein M; Klinger A; Soskolne A; Piattelli A; Shapira L
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 May; 22(5):473-80. PubMed ID: 21087317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus: a comparative histomorphometric study in sheep.
    Haas R; Baron M; Donath K; Zechner W; Watzek G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 12074448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of platelet-rich plasma with autogenous bone graft for maxillary sinus augmentation in a rabbit model.
    Butterfield KJ; Bennett J; Gronowicz G; Adams D
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 63(3):370-6. PubMed ID: 15742289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maxillary sinus augmentation with the xenograft Bio-Oss and autogenous intraoral bone for qualitative improvement of the implant site: a histologic and histomorphometric clinical study in humans.
    Yildirim M; Spiekermann H; Handt S; Edelhoff D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 11280359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are culture-expanded autogenous bone cells a clinically reliable option for sinus grafting?
    Fuerst G; Strbac GD; Vasak C; Tangl S; Leber J; Gahleitner A; Gruber R; Watzek G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 19077153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maxillary sinus augmentation with a synthetic cell-binding peptide: histological and histomorphometrical results in humans.
    Degidi M; Piattelli M; Scarano A; Iezzi G; Piattelli A
    J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(6):376-83. PubMed ID: 15641457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sinus floor augmentation with recombinant human growth and differentiation factor-5 (rhGDF-5): a pilot study in the Goettingen miniature pig comparing autogenous bone and rhGDF-5.
    Gruber RM; Ludwig A; Merten HA; Pippig S; Kramer FJ; Schliephake H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 19077151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maxillary sinus grafting with Bio-Oss or Straumann Bone Ceramic: histomorphometric results from a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial.
    Cordaro L; Bosshardt DD; Palattella P; Rao W; Serino G; Chiapasco M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):796-803. PubMed ID: 18705811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maxillary sinus floor elevation with bovine bone mineral combined with either autogenous bone or autogenous stem cells: a prospective randomized clinical trial.
    Rickert D; Sauerbier S; Nagursky H; Menne D; Vissink A; Raghoebar GM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Mar; 22(3):251-8. PubMed ID: 20831758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical and histologic comparison of two different composite grafts for sinus augmentation: a pilot clinical trial.
    Galindo-Moreno P; Avila G; Fernández-Barbero JE; Mesa F; O'Valle-Ravassa F; Wang HL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):755-9. PubMed ID: 18573123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of platelet-rich plasma on sinus lifting: a randomized-controlled clinical trial.
    Torres J; Tamimi F; Martinez PP; Alkhraisat MH; Linares R; Hernández G; Torres-Macho J; López-Cabarcos E
    J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Aug; 36(8):677-87. PubMed ID: 19563329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of space-filling materials in subantral bone augmentation: blood clot vs. autogenous bone chips vs. bovine hydroxyapatite.
    Lambert F; Léonard A; Drion P; Sourice S; Layrolle P; Rompen E
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 May; 22(5):538-45. PubMed ID: 21198906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scintigraphic, histologic, and histomorphometric analyses of bovine bone mineral and autogenous bone mixture in sinus floor augmentation: a randomized controlled trial--results after 4 months of healing.
    Pikdöken L; Gürbüzer B; Küçükodacı Z; Urhan M; Barış E; Tezulaş E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 69(1):160-9. PubMed ID: 21050644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Histological and histomorphometrical analyses of biopsies harvested 11 years after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with deproteinized bovine and autogenous bone.
    Mordenfeld A; Hallman M; Johansson CB; Albrektsson T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Sep; 21(9):961-70. PubMed ID: 20497443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Purely cancellous vs. corticocancellous bone in sinus floor augmentation with autogenous iliac crest: a prospective clinical trial.
    Gerressen M; Hermanns-Sachweh B; Riediger D; Hilgers RD; Spiekermann H; Ghassemi A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 19077155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Calvarial versus iliac crest for autologous bone graft material for a sinus lift procedure: a histomorphometric study.
    Crespi R; Vinci R; Capparè P; Gherlone E; Romanos GE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):527-32. PubMed ID: 17929512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.