These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19665274)

  • 1. Cyclic variations in sustained human performance.
    Aue WR; Arruda JE; Kass SJ; Stanny CJ
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Dec; 71(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 19665274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rhythmic oscillations in the performance of a sustained attention task.
    Smith KJ; Valentino DA; Arruda JE
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2003 Jun; 25(4):561-70. PubMed ID: 12911107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rhythmic oscillations in quantitative EEG measured during a continuous performance task.
    Arruda JE; Zhang H; Amoss RT; Coburn KL; Aue WR
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2009 Mar; 34(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 19057991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Self-Alert Training: volitional modulation of autonomic arousal improves sustained attention.
    O'Connell RG; Bellgrove MA; Dockree PM; Lau A; Fitzgerald M; Robertson IH
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Apr; 46(5):1379-90. PubMed ID: 18249419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modality-specific aspects of sustained and divided attentional performance in multiple sclerosis.
    McCarthy M; Beaumont JG; Thompson R; Peacock S
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2005 Aug; 20(6):705-18. PubMed ID: 15913949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling cyclic variations in sustained human performance as measured by reaction time and the flash visual evoked potential-P2.
    Case JL; Arruda JE; VanWormer LA
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Mar; 101():43-9. PubMed ID: 26825236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What determines sustained visual attention? The impact of distracter positions, task difficulty and visual fields compared.
    Kraft A; Pape N; Hagendorf H; Schmidt S; Naito A; Brandt SA
    Brain Res; 2007 Feb; 1133(1):123-35. PubMed ID: 17174284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Circadian and homeostatic variation in sustained attention.
    Valdez P; Ramírez C; García A; Talamantes J; Cortez J
    Chronobiol Int; 2010 Jan; 27(2):393-416. PubMed ID: 20370477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The target of task switching.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Jun; 64(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 20565179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impulsive responding and the sustained attention to response task.
    Helton WS
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2009 Jan; 31(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18608658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the role of motor regulation in figural fluency: partialing variance in the Ruff Figural fluency test.
    Kraybill ML; Suchy Y
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2008 Nov; 30(8):903-12. PubMed ID: 18608686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Age trends for failures of sustained attention.
    Carriere JS; Cheyne JA; Solman GJ; Smilek D
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Sep; 25(3):569-74. PubMed ID: 20677878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sustained attention to local and global target features is different: performance and tympanic membrane temperature.
    Helton WS; Hayrynen L; Schaeffer D
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Oct; 71(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 19329239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of caffeine on prospective duration judgements of various intervals depend on task difficulty.
    Gruber RP; Block RA
    Hum Psychopharmacol; 2005 Jun; 20(4):275-85. PubMed ID: 15852464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exemplar similarity and rule application.
    Hahn U; Prat-Sala M; Pothos EM; Brumby DP
    Cognition; 2010 Jan; 114(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 19815187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrophysiological indices of spatial attention during global/local processing in good and poor phonological decoders.
    Matthews AJ; Martin FH
    Brain Lang; 2009 Dec; 111(3):152-60. PubMed ID: 19828188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Noradrenergic genotype predicts lapses in sustained attention.
    Greene CM; Bellgrove MA; Gill M; Robertson IH
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(2):591-4. PubMed ID: 18973765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Divided attention capacity in adults with autism spectrum disorders and without intellectual disability.
    Bogte H; Flamma B; Van Der Meere J; Van Engeland H
    Autism; 2009 May; 13(3):229-43. PubMed ID: 19369386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Independence of speed and accuracy in visual search: evidence for separate mechanisms.
    Wilding J; Cornish K
    Child Neuropsychol; 2007 Nov; 13(6):510-21. PubMed ID: 17852132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.