36 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19665906)
1. Use of Bayesian modeling to estimate the sensitivity of stereotactic directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy when the gold standard is incomplete.
Wang J; Kuo WH; Pan SL; Chang KJ; Teng YC; Shih TT
Acad Radiol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):1316-22. PubMed ID: 19665906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Upright stereotactic vacuum-assisted needle biopsy of suspicious breast microcalcifications.
Sim LS; Kei PL
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2008 Aug; 52(4):358-64. PubMed ID: 18811759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy: initial experience.
Orel SG; Rosen M; Mies C; Schnall MD
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 16304093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast cancer diagnosis: the role of stereotactic vacuum-assisted aspiration biopsy.
Rovera F; Dionigi G; Marelli M; Ferrari A; Limonta G; Corben AD; Boni L; Piscopo C; De Berardinis V; Dionigi R
Int J Surg; 2008; 6 Suppl 1():S104-8. PubMed ID: 19121611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of a hemostasis introducer sheath to guide clip delivery during stereotactic directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy when the biopsy system malfunctions.
Wang J; Chang CJ
Clin Imaging; 2010; 34(5):385-7. PubMed ID: 20813305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Stereotactic needle breast biopsy: Diagnostic reliability of various biopsy systems and needle sizes].
Pfarl G; Helbich TH; Riedl CC; Rudas M; Wagner T; Memarsadeghi M; Lomoschitz F
Rofo; 2002 May; 174(5):614-9. PubMed ID: 11997862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pain and complications of directional vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy: comparison of the Mammotome and Vacora techniques.
Salem C; Sakr R; Chopier J; Antoine M; Uzan S; Daraï E
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):295-9. PubMed ID: 18755562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stereotactic directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy using lateral approach.
Nakamura Y; Urashima M; Matsuura A; Nishihara R; Itoh A; Kagemoto M; Higaki K
Breast Cancer; 2010 Oct; 17(4):286-9. PubMed ID: 19784717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Upstaging of atypical ductal hyperplasia after vacuum-assisted 11-gauge stereotactic core needle biopsy.
Winchester DJ; Bernstein JR; Jeske JM; Nicholson MH; Hahn EA; Goldschmidt RA; Watkin WG; Sener SF; Bilimoria MB; Barrera E; Winchester DP
Arch Surg; 2003 Jun; 138(6):619-22; discussion 622-3. PubMed ID: 12799332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Breast calcifications with percutaneous vacuum-assisted biopsy diagnosis of malignancy or atypical hyerplasia: correlations with surgical findings].
Piubello Q; Montemezzi S; D'Atri C
Pathologica; 2002 Dec; 94(6):299-305. PubMed ID: 12540993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stereotactic core needle breast biopsy is an accurate diagnostic technique to assess nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities.
Fuhrman G; Cederbom G; Champagne J; Farr G; McKinnon W; Bolton J; Ordoyne WK
J La State Med Soc; 1996 Apr; 148(4):167-70. PubMed ID: 8935619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of stereotactic 11-g vacuum-assisted breast biopsy on cost of diagnosis in Austria.
Gruber R; Walter E; Helbich TH
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Jan; 77(1):131-6. PubMed ID: 19853395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the accuracy of two minimally invasive breast biopsy methods: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
Fahrbach K; Sledge I; Cella C; Linz H; Ross SD
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2006 May; 274(2):63-73. PubMed ID: 16598478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the interpretation of test sensitivity in the two-test two-population problem: assumptions matter.
Johnson WO; Gardner IA; Metoyer CN; Branscum AJ
Prev Vet Med; 2009 Oct; 91(2-4):116-21. PubMed ID: 19651450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stereotactic breast biopsy with an 8-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted probe: initial experience.
Lifrange E; Dondelinger RF; Quatresooz P; Vandevorst G; Colin C
Eur Radiol; 2002 Sep; 12(9):2180-7. PubMed ID: 12195467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Bayesian approach to estimate and validate the false negative fraction in a two-stage multiple screening test.
Held L; Ranyimbo AO
Methods Inf Med; 2004; 43(5):461-4. PubMed ID: 15702201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Re: "Bayesian estimation of disease prevalence and the parameters of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard".
Andersen S
Am J Epidemiol; 1997 Feb; 145(3):290-1. PubMed ID: 9012602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Bayesian adjustment for the misclassification in both dependent and independent variables with application to a breast cancer study.
Liu J; Gustafson P; Huo D
Stat Med; 2016 Oct; 35(23):4252-63. PubMed ID: 27238294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bayesian Modeling of Test Reliability.
Tanzer JR; Harlow LL
Multivariate Behav Res; 2021; 56(1):159. PubMed ID: 33275469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Learning Low-Dimensional Signal Models: A Bayesian approach based on incomplete measurements.
Carin L; Baraniuk RG; Cevher V; Dunson D; Jordan MI; Sapiro G; Wakin MB
IEEE Signal Process Mag; 2011 Mar; 28(2):. PubMed ID: 24363544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
