These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19666851)

  • 1. Prospective cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluation of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group CO.17 trial.
    Mittmann N; Au HJ; Tu D; O'Callaghan CJ; Isogai PK; Karapetis CS; Zalcberg JR; Evans WK; Moore MJ; Siddiqui J; Findlay B; Colwell B; Simes J; Gibbs P; Links M; Tebbutt NC; Jonker DJ; ;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(17):1182-92. PubMed ID: 19666851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Economic analysis of bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
    Lawrence D; Maschio M; Leahy KJ; Yunger S; Easaw JC; Weinstein MC
    J Med Econ; 2013 Dec; 16(12):1387-98. PubMed ID: 24102083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness analysis of KRAS testing and cetuximab as last-line therapy for colorectal cancer.
    Shiroiwa T; Motoo Y; Tsutani K
    Mol Diagn Ther; 2010 Dec; 14(6):375-84. PubMed ID: 21275455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Challenges and opportunities for use of cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Yabroff KR; Schrag D
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(17):1161-3. PubMed ID: 19666852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of cetuximab, cetuximab plus irinotecan, and panitumumab for third and further lines of treatment for KRAS wild-type patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Hoyle M; Peters J; Crathorne L; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Hyde C
    Value Health; 2013; 16(2):288-96. PubMed ID: 23538180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic review and economic evaluation of bevacizumab and cetuximab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Tappenden P; Jones R; Paisley S; Carroll C
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 Mar; 11(12):1-128, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 17346499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. KRAS and BRAF mutation analysis in metastatic colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis from a Swiss perspective.
    Blank PR; Moch H; Szucs TD; Schwenkglenks M
    Clin Cancer Res; 2011 Oct; 17(19):6338-46. PubMed ID: 21807639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (mono- or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy (review of technology appraisal No.150 and part review of technology appraisal No. 118): a systematic review and economic model.
    Hoyle M; Crathorne L; Peters J; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Tappenden P; Hyde C
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 Apr; 17(14):1-237. PubMed ID: 23547747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of KRAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients in the United States and Germany.
    Vijayaraghavan A; Efrusy MB; Göke B; Kirchner T; Santas CC; Goldberg RM
    Int J Cancer; 2012 Jul; 131(2):438-45. PubMed ID: 21898389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Economic Analysis of Panitumumab Compared With Cetuximab in Patients With Wild-type KRAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer That Progressed After Standard Chemotherapy.
    Graham CN; Maglinte GA; Schwartzberg LS; Price TJ; Knox HN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; Barber B; Fakih MG
    Clin Ther; 2016 Jun; 38(6):1376-1391. PubMed ID: 27085587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. KRAS mutation testing of tumours in adults with metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Westwood M; van Asselt T; Ramaekers B; Whiting P; Joore M; Armstrong N; Noake C; Ross J; Severens J; Kleijnen J
    Health Technol Assess; 2014 Oct; 18(62):1-132. PubMed ID: 25314637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Health-related quality of life in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab: overall and KRAS-specific results of the NCIC CTG and AGITG CO.17 Trial.
    Au HJ; Karapetis CS; O'Callaghan CJ; Tu D; Moore MJ; Zalcberg JR; Kennecke H; Shapiro JD; Koski S; Pavlakis N; Charpentier D; Wyld D; Jefford M; Knight GJ; Magoski NM; Brundage MD; Jonker DJ
    J Clin Oncol; 2009 Apr; 27(11):1822-8. PubMed ID: 19273701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of PTEN, BRAF, and EGFR status in determining benefit from cetuximab therapy in wild-type KRAS metastatic colon cancer.
    Laurent-Puig P; Cayre A; Manceau G; Buc E; Bachet JB; Lecomte T; Rougier P; Lievre A; Landi B; Boige V; Ducreux M; Ychou M; Bibeau F; Bouché O; Reid J; Stone S; Penault-Llorca F
    J Clin Oncol; 2009 Dec; 27(35):5924-30. PubMed ID: 19884556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (review of technology appraisal no. 176) and panitumumab (partial review of technology appraisal no. 240) for previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Huxley N; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Tikhonova I; Snowsill T; Briscoe S; Peters J; Bond M; Napier M; Hoyle M
    Health Technol Assess; 2017 Jun; 21(38):1-294. PubMed ID: 28682222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-minimization analysis of the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Greece.
    Fragoulakis V; Papagiannopoulou V; Kourlaba G; Maniadakis N; Fountzilas G
    Clin Ther; 2012 Oct; 34(10):2132-42. PubMed ID: 23063374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of companion diagnostic for detection of mutations in codons 12 and 13 of the KRAS gene in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of the NCIC CTG CO.17 trial.
    Harbison CT; Horak CE; Ledeine JM; Mukhopadhyay P; Malone DP; O'Callaghan C; Jonker DJ; Karapetis CS; Khambata-Ford S; Gustafson N; Trifan OC; Chang SC; Ravetto P; Iv GA
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Jun; 137(6):820-7. PubMed ID: 23030695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Graham CN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; de Liège F; Lanier J; Knox H; Barber B
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 Nov; 50(16):2791-801. PubMed ID: 25219451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ipilimumab in 2nd line treatment of patients with advanced melanoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Barzey V; Atkins MB; Garrison LP; Asukai Y; Kotapati S; Penrod JR
    J Med Econ; 2013; 16(2):202-12. PubMed ID: 23057750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association of KRAS p.G13D mutation with outcome in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab.
    De Roock W; Jonker DJ; Di Nicolantonio F; Sartore-Bianchi A; Tu D; Siena S; Lamba S; Arena S; Frattini M; Piessevaux H; Van Cutsem E; O'Callaghan CJ; Khambata-Ford S; Zalcberg JR; Simes J; Karapetis CS; Bardelli A; Tejpar S
    JAMA; 2010 Oct; 304(16):1812-20. PubMed ID: 20978259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wild-type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Di Nicolantonio F; Martini M; Molinari F; Sartore-Bianchi A; Arena S; Saletti P; De Dosso S; Mazzucchelli L; Frattini M; Siena S; Bardelli A
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Dec; 26(35):5705-12. PubMed ID: 19001320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 59.