These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19666851)
41. Evaluation of the Cost-effectiveness of Doublet Therapy in Metastatic BRAF Variant Colorectal Cancer. Patel KK; Stein S; Lacy J; O'Hara M; Huntington SF JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Jan; 4(1):e2033441. PubMed ID: 33433598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase-1 (MKP-1) impairs the response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Montagut C; Iglesias M; Arumi M; Bellosillo B; Gallen M; Martinez-Fernandez A; Martinez-Aviles L; Cañadas I; Dalmases A; Moragon E; Lema L; Serrano S; Rovira A; Rojo F; Bellmunt J; Albanell J Br J Cancer; 2010 Mar; 102(7):1137-44. PubMed ID: 20234366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Different Sequences of the Use of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors for Wild-Type KRAS Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Riesco-Martínez MC; Berry SR; Ko YJ; Mittmann N; Giotis A; Lien K; Wong WW; Chan KK J Oncol Pract; 2016 Jun; 12(6):e710-23. PubMed ID: 27143148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Correlation of FCGR3A and EGFR germline polymorphisms with the efficacy of cetuximab in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Pander J; Gelderblom H; Antonini NF; Tol J; van Krieken JH; van der Straaten T; Punt CJ; Guchelaar HJ Eur J Cancer; 2010 Jul; 46(10):1829-34. PubMed ID: 20418097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Cost-effectiveness of FOLFIRI + cetuximab vs FOLFIRI + bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of Stintzing S; van Oostrum I; Pescott CP; Ronga P; Heeg B; Heinemann V J Med Econ; 2020 May; 23(5):448-455. PubMed ID: 31903807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Cetuximab for the treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Greenhalgh J; Bagust A; Boland A; Fleeman N; McLeod C; Dundar Y; Proudlove C; Shaw R Health Technol Assess; 2009 Oct; 13 Suppl 3():49-54. PubMed ID: 19846029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Cost-effectiveness of trastuzumab in the treatment of early stages breast cancer patients, in Portugal]. Macedo A; Monteiro I; Andrade S; Cirrincione A; Ray J Acta Med Port; 2010; 23(3):475-82. PubMed ID: 20654267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The relationship between rash, tumour KRAS mutation status and clinical and quality of life outcomes in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab in the NCIC CTG/AGITG CO.17. Sommeijer DW; Karapetis CS; Zalcberg JR; Tu D; Jonker DJ; Simes J; Tebbutt N; Yip D; Price TJ; O'Callaghan CJ Acta Oncol; 2014 Jul; 53(7):877-84. PubMed ID: 24495042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Cost-effectiveness of cetuximab and panitumumab for chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Carvalho AC; Leal F; Sasse AD PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175409. PubMed ID: 28403233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. KRAS mutations and susceptibility to cetuximab and panitumumab in colorectal cancer. Jimeno A; Messersmith WA; Hirsch FR; Franklin WA; Eckhardt SG Cancer J; 2009; 15(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 19390304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Cetuximab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer-from the result of recent clinical trials]. Ariyama H; Kusaba H; Baba E Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2010 May; 37(5):782-6. PubMed ID: 20495306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Economic evaluation of nivolumab for the treatment of second-line advanced squamous NSCLC in Canada: a comparison of modeling approaches to estimate and extrapolate survival outcomes. Goeree R; Villeneuve J; Goeree J; Penrod JR; Orsini L; Tahami Monfared AA J Med Econ; 2016 Jun; 19(6):630-44. PubMed ID: 26850122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A prospective observational study to examine the relationship between quality of life and adverse events of first-line chemotherapy plus cetuximab in patients with KRAS wild-type unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: QUACK Trial. Ooki A; Ando M; Sakamoto J; Sato A; Fujii H; Yamaguchi K Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2014 Apr; 44(4):383-7. PubMed ID: 24558128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Economic evaluation study (CHEER-compliant): Cost-effectiveness analysis of RAS screening for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer based on the CALGB 80405 trial. Zhou J; Zhao R; Wen F; Zhang P; Tang R; Chen H; Zhang J; Li Q Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Jul; 95(27):e3762. PubMed ID: 27399059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. KRAS mutation signature in colorectal tumors significantly overlaps with the cetuximab response signature. de Reyniès A; Boige V; Milano G; Faivre J; Laurent-Puig P J Clin Oncol; 2008 May; 26(13):2228-30; author reply 2230-1. PubMed ID: 18445856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Molecular mechanisms of resistance to cetuximab and panitumumab in colorectal cancer. Bardelli A; Siena S J Clin Oncol; 2010 Mar; 28(7):1254-61. PubMed ID: 20100961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Clinical relevance of EGFR- and KRAS-status in colorectal cancer patients treated with monoclonal antibodies directed against the EGFR. Heinemann V; Stintzing S; Kirchner T; Boeck S; Jung A Cancer Treat Rev; 2009 May; 35(3):262-71. PubMed ID: 19117687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Mutation of EGFR signaling pathway and therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer]. Nozawa K; Watanabe T Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2010 May; 37(5):791-4. PubMed ID: 20495308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Trastuzumab for the treatment of primary breast cancer in HER2-positive women: a single technology appraisal. Ward S; Pilgrim H; Hind D Health Technol Assess; 2009 Jun; 13 Suppl 1():1-6. PubMed ID: 19567207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]