452 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19668956)
1. Correlation between diurnal variation of intraocular pressure, ocular pulse amplitude and corneal structural properties.
Villas-Bôas FS; Doi LM; Sousa AK; Melo LA
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2009; 72(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 19668956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation between Central Corneal Thickness and Intraocular Pressure Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometry or Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometry.
Katsimpris JM; Theoulakis PE; Vasilopoulos K; Skourtis G; Papadopoulos GE; Petropoulos IK
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Apr; 232(4):414-8. PubMed ID: 25902089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intraocular pressure measurement-comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry.
Schneider E; Grehn F
J Glaucoma; 2006 Feb; 15(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 16378009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic contour tonometry for intraocular pressure measurement.
Kamppeter BA; Jonas JB
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Aug; 140(2):318-20. PubMed ID: 16086958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of factors affecting the difference in intraocular pressure measurements between dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry.
Wang J; Cayer MM; Descovich D; Kamdeu-Fansi A; Harasymowycz PJ; Li G; Lesk MR
J Glaucoma; 2011 Oct; 20(8):482-7. PubMed ID: 21048515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Goldmann applanation tonometer versus ocular response analyzer for measuring intraocular pressure after congenital cataract surgery.
Feizi S; Faramarzi A; Kheiri B
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):582-589. PubMed ID: 30246567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [How does central cornea thickness influence intraocular pressure during applanation and contour tonometry?].
Schwenteck T; Knappe M; Moros I
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Sep; 229(9):917-27. PubMed ID: 22972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of central corneal thickness on dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in primary open-angle glaucoma.
Grieshaber MC; Schoetzau A; Zawinka C; Flammer J; Orgul S
Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Jun; 125(6):740-4. PubMed ID: 17562982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation between intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, stage of glaucoma, and demographic patient data: prospective analysis of biophysical parameters in tertiary glaucoma practice populations.
Kniestedt C; Lin S; Choe J; Nee M; Bostrom A; Stürmer J; Stamper RL
J Glaucoma; 2006 Apr; 15(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 16633220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude comparisons in different types of glaucoma using dynamic contour tonometry.
Punjabi OS; Ho HK; Kniestedt C; Bostrom AG; Stamper RL; Lin SC
Curr Eye Res; 2006 Oct; 31(10):851-62. PubMed ID: 17050277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ocular pulse amplitude in normal tension and primary open angle glaucoma.
Stalmans I; Harris A; Vanbellinghen V; Zeyen T; Siesky B
J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):403-7. PubMed ID: 18703952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ocular pulse amplitude measurement using pascal dynamic contour tonometer in glaucoma patients.
Katsimpris JM; Theoulakis PE; Papadopoulos GE; Katsimpris A; Lepidas J; Petropoulos IK
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2014 Apr; 231(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 24771168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relationship between diurnal variations in intraocular pressure measurements and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
Kotecha A; Crabb DP; Spratt A; Garway-Heath DF
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Sep; 50(9):4229-36. PubMed ID: 19407025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
Francis BA; Hsieh A; Lai MY; Chopra V; Pena F; Azen S; Varma R;
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17070592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraocular pressure measurements in diabetes mellitus.
Ramm L; Herber R; Spoerl E; Pillunat LE; Terai N
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2020 Nov; 30(6):1432-1439. PubMed ID: 31779470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: Difference of Intraocular Pressure Values Between Eyes with and without Glaucomatous Damage in Thin Corneas].
Umurhan Akkan JC; Akkan F; Sezgin Akcay BI; Ayintap E; Tuncer K
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Oct; 232(10):1190-7. PubMed ID: 26512850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement of intraocular pressure in LASIK and LASEK patients using the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Kirwan C; O'Keefe M
J Refract Surg; 2008 Apr; 24(4):366-70. PubMed ID: 18500086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparative characteristics of current tonometric methods].
Astakhov IuS; Akopov EL; Potemkin VV
Vestn Oftalmol; 2008; 124(5):11-4. PubMed ID: 19062549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Central corneal thickness, tonometry, and ocular dimensions in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Singh RP; Goldberg I; Graham SL; Sharma A; Mohsin M
J Glaucoma; 2001 Jun; 10(3):206-10. PubMed ID: 11442184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
