452 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19668956)
21. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry are not correlated with central corneal thickness in primary open angle glaucoma.
Regev G; Harris A; Siesky B; Shoshani Y; Egan P; Moss A; Zalish M; WuDunn D; Ehrlich R
J Glaucoma; 2011; 20(5):282-6. PubMed ID: 20577097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Ocuton-S self tonometry vs. Goldmann tonometry; a diurnal comparison study.
Kóthy P; Vargha P; Holló G
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2001 Jun; 79(3):294-7. PubMed ID: 11401642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and their relationship to corneal properties, refractive error, and ocular pulse amplitude.
Erickson DH; Goodwin D; Rollins M; Belaustegui A; Anderson C
Optometry; 2009 Apr; 80(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 19329059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
Eye (Lond); 2009 Feb; 23(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 18219335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Intraocular pressure, corneal thickness, and corneal hysteresis in Steinert's myotonic dystrophy.
Garcia Filho CA; Prata TS; Sousa AK; Doi LM; Melo LA
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2011; 74(3):161-2. PubMed ID: 21915439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Factors influencing intermethod agreement between goldmann applanation, pascal dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometry.
Sullivan-Mee M; Lewis SE; Pensyl D; Gerhardt G; Halverson KD; Qualls C
J Glaucoma; 2013 Aug; 22(6):487-95. PubMed ID: 22407388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Physiological diurnal variability and characteristics of the ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) with the dynamic contour tonometer (DCT-Pascal).
Pourjavan S; Boëlle PY; Detry-Morel M; De Potter P
Int Ophthalmol; 2007 Dec; 27(6):357-60. PubMed ID: 17955180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The Relationship Between Corvis ST Tonometry Parameters and Ocular Response Analyzer Corneal Hysteresis.
Fujishiro T; Matsuura M; Fujino Y; Murata H; Tokumo K; Nakakura S; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R
J Glaucoma; 2020 Jun; 29(6):479-484. PubMed ID: 32134829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. New ways to measure intraocular pressure.
ElMallah MK; Asrani SG
Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 19(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 18301285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Do ocular pulse amplitude and choroidal thickness change in patients with thyroid eye disease?
Ozturk Karabulut G; Fazil K; Ozturker C; Gunaydin ZK; Altan C; İnal A; Taskapili M; Kaynak P
Orbit; 2019 Oct; 38(5):347-352. PubMed ID: 30335539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma.
Sullivan-Mee M; Halverson KD; Qualls C
J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature on the intraocular pressure measurement by Goldmann applanation tonometer and ocular blood flow pneumatonometer.
Saleh TA; Adams M; McDermott B; Claridge KG; Ewings P
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 34(6):516-20. PubMed ID: 16925697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Corneal hysteresis in post-radial keratotomy primary open-angle glaucoma.
Hardin JS; Lee CI; Lane LF; Hester CC; Morshedi RG
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 256(10):1971-1976. PubMed ID: 30039270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Relative importance of factors affecting corneal hysteresis measurement.
Sullivan-Mee M; Katiyar S; Pensyl D; Halverson KD; Qualls C
Optom Vis Sci; 2012 May; 89(5):E803-11. PubMed ID: 22426173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Utility of Goldmann applanation tonometry for monitoring intraocular pressure in glaucoma patients with a history of laser refractive surgery.
Lee SY; Bae HW; Kwon HJ; Seong GJ; Kim CY
PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192344. PubMed ID: 29401477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Corneal biomechanical properties affect Goldmann applanation tonometry in primary open-angle glaucoma.
Costin BR; Fleming GP; Weber PA; Mahmoud AM; Roberts CJ
J Glaucoma; 2014 Feb; 23(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 23603825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The effect of contact lens-induced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
Oh JH; Yoo C; Kim YY; Kim HM; Song JS
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 247(3):371-5. PubMed ID: 18843499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Intraocular pressure and corneal thickness. A comparison between non-contact tonometry and applanation tonometry].
Domke N; Hager A; Wiegand W
Ophthalmologe; 2006 Jul; 103(7):583-7. PubMed ID: 16786183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Diurnal variation of central corneal thickness and Goldmann applanation tonometry estimates of intraocular pressure.
Hamilton KE; Pye DC; Aggarwala S; Evian S; Khosla J; Perera R
J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 17224746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
