These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Do conventional glass ionomer cements release more fluoride than resin-modified glass ionomer cements? Cabral MF; Martinho RL; Guedes-Neto MV; Rebelo MA; Pontes DG; Cohen-Carneiro F Restor Dent Endod; 2015 Aug; 40(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 26295024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Wear of an ion-releasing powder/liquid polymer resin in relation to that of glass-ionomer and conventional resin composites. Heintze SD; Zellweger G; Peschke A Am J Dent; 2020 Aug; 33(4):171-177. PubMed ID: 32794389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effects of in vitro fluoride mouth rinse on the antibacterial properties of orthodontic cements. Slutzky H; Feuerstein O; Namuz K; Shpack N; Lewinstein I; Matalon S Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 Aug; 17(3):150-7. PubMed ID: 24703015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of chemical and mechanical degradation on surface roughness of three glass ionomers and a nanofilled resin composite. Carvalho FG; Sampaio CS; Fucio SB; Carlo HL; Correr-Sobrinho L; Puppin-Rontani RM Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):509-17. PubMed ID: 22433031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. In vitro caries inhibition at the enamel margins of glass ionomer restoratives developed for the ART approach. Smales RJ; Gao W J Dent; 2000 May; 28(4):249-56. PubMed ID: 10722898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of APF Minute-Foam on the surface roughness, hardness, and micromorphology of high-viscosity glass ionomers. García-Godoy F; García-Godoy A; García-Godoy F J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 12762603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A simple acid erosion test for dental water-based cements. Nomoto R; McCabe JF Dent Mater; 2001 Jan; 17(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 11124414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The physical-mechanical performance of the new Ketac Molar Easymix compared to commercially available glass ionomer restoratives. Peez R; Frank S J Dent; 2006 Sep; 34(8):582-7. PubMed ID: 16581174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Ion release by resin-modified glass-ionomer cements into water and lactic acid solutions. Czarnecka B; Nicholson JW J Dent; 2006 Sep; 34(8):539-43. PubMed ID: 16504366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Gradual surface degradation of restorative materials by acidic agents. Hengtrakool C; Kukiattrakoon B; Kedjarune-Leggat U Gen Dent; 2011; 59(2):e50-62. PubMed ID: 21903509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Bond strength of luting cements to core foundation materials. Hewlett S; Wadenya RO; Mante FK Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010 Mar; 31(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 20344899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Wilder AD; Swift EJ; May KN; Thompson JY; McDougal RA J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 10785304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The interaction of glass-ionomer cements containing vinylphosphonic acid with water and aqueous lactic acid. Nicholson JW; Czarnecka B; Limanowska-Shaw H J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Feb; 30(2):160-4. PubMed ID: 12535142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of one-year water storage on the surface microhardness of resin-modified versus conventional glass-ionomer cements. Ellakuria J; Triana R; Mínguez N; Soler I; Ibaseta G; Maza J; García-Godoy F Dent Mater; 2003 Jun; 19(4):286-90. PubMed ID: 12686292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effect of three finishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials. Hoelscher DC; Neme AM; Pink FE; Hughes PJ Oper Dent; 1998; 23(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 9610331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]