186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19669175)
1. Influence of examiner's clinical experience on the reproducibility and accuracy of radiographic examination in detecting occlusal caries.
Diniz MB; Rodrigues JA; Neuhaus KW; Cordeiro RC; Lussi A
Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Oct; 14(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 19669175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro evaluation of ICDAS and radiographic examination of occlusal surfaces and their association with treatment decisions.
Diniz MB; Lima LM; Eckert G; Zandona AG; Cordeiro RC; Pinto LS
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 21777096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiographic evaluation of occlusal caries: effect of training and experience.
Lazarchik DA; Firestone AR; Heaven TJ; Filler SJ; Lussi A
Caries Res; 1995; 29(5):355-8. PubMed ID: 8521436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of laser fluorescence devices, visual and radiographic examination for the detection of occlusal caries in primary molars.
Neuhaus KW; Rodrigues JA; Hug I; Stich H; Lussi A
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Oct; 15(5):635-41. PubMed ID: 20505963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of professional experience on detection and treatment decision of occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth.
Bussaneli DG; Boldieri T; Diniz MB; Rivera LM; Santos-Pinto L; Cordeiro Rde C
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Nov; 25(6):418-27. PubMed ID: 25511642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnosis of dentin involvement in occlusal caries based on visual and radiographic examination of the teeth.
Nytun RB; Raadal M; Espelid I
Scand J Dent Res; 1992 Jun; 100(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 1631482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of examiner's clinical experience in detecting occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth.
Bengtson AL; Gomes AC; Mendes FM; Cichello LR; Bengtson NG; Pinheiro SL
Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 16173230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative study of different radiographic methods for detecting occlusal caries lesions.
Tarım Ertas E; Küçükyılmaz E; Ertaş H; Savaş S; Yırcalı Atıcı M
Caries Res; 2014; 48(6):566-74. PubMed ID: 25073755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of experienced dentists in Switzerland after an e-learning program on ICDAS occlusal caries detection.
Rodrigues JA; de Oliveira RS; Hug I; Neuhaus K; Lussi A
J Dent Educ; 2013 Aug; 77(8):1086-91. PubMed ID: 23929579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The performance of conventional and fluorescence-based methods for occlusal caries detection: an in vivo study with histologic validation.
Diniz MB; Boldieri T; Rodrigues JA; Santos-Pinto L; Lussi A; Cordeiro RC
J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Apr; 143(4):339-50. PubMed ID: 22467694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of laser fluorescence devices for detection of caries in primary teeth.
Cınar C; Atabek D; Odabaş ME; Olmez A
Int Dent J; 2013 Apr; 63(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 23550523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical performance of clinical-visual examination, digital bitewing radiography, laser fluorescence, and near-infrared light transillumination for detection of non-cavitated proximal enamel and dentin caries.
Kocak N; Cengiz-Yanardag E
Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Sep; 35(7):1621-1628. PubMed ID: 32333336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.
Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C
Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing the accuracy of Dutch dentists and dental students in the radiographic diagnosis of dentinal caries.
Mileman PA; van den Hout WB
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 11803382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical performance of two fluorescence-based methods in detecting occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth.
Matos R; Novaes TF; Braga MM; Siqueira WL; Duarte DA; Mendes FM
Caries Res; 2011; 45(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 21625126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of direct digital radiography for detecting occlusal caries in primary teeth compared with conventional radiography and visual inspection: an in vitro study.
Dias da Silva PR; Martins Marques M; Steagall W; Medeiros Mendes F; Lascala CA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Sep; 39(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 20729186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An in vitro comparison of the ability of fibre-optic transillumination, visual inspection and radiographs to detect occlusal caries and evaluate lesion depth.
Côrtes DF; Ekstrand KR; Elias-Boneta AR; Ellwood RP
Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):443-7. PubMed ID: 11093016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vivo effectiveness of laser fluorescence compared to visual inspection and radiography for the detection of occlusal caries in primary teeth.
Rocha RO; Ardenghi TM; Oliveira LB; Rodrigues CR; Ciamponi AL
Caries Res; 2003; 37(6):437-41. PubMed ID: 14571122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical performance of a new laser fluorescence device for detection of occlusal caries lesions in permanent molars.
Huth KC; Neuhaus KW; Gygax M; Bücher K; Crispin A; Paschos E; Hickel R; Lussi A
J Dent; 2008 Dec; 36(12):1033-40. PubMed ID: 18930575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
