BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

592 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19669409)

  • 1. Concordance of clinical and molecular breast cancer subtyping in the context of preoperative chemotherapy response.
    de Ronde JJ; Hannemann J; Halfwerk H; Mulder L; Straver ME; Vrancken Peeters MJ; Wesseling J; van de Vijver M; Wessels LF; Rodenhuis S
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Jan; 119(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 19669409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes.
    Carey LA; Dees EC; Sawyer L; Gatti L; Moore DT; Collichio F; Ollila DW; Sartor CI; Graham ML; Perou CM
    Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Apr; 13(8):2329-34. PubMed ID: 17438091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Triple-negative phenotype is of adverse prognostic value in patients treated with dose-dense sequential adjuvant chemotherapy: a translational research analysis in the context of a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) randomized phase III trial.
    Skarlos P; Christodoulou C; Kalogeras KT; Eleftheraki AG; Bobos M; Batistatou A; Valavanis C; Tzaida O; Timotheadou E; Kronenwett R; Wirtz RM; Kostopoulos I; Televantou D; Koutselini E; Papaspirou I; Papadimitriou CA; Pectasides D; Gogas H; Aravantinos G; Pavlidis N; Arapantoni P; Skarlos DV; Fountzilas G
    Cancer Chemother Pharmacol; 2012 Feb; 69(2):533-46. PubMed ID: 21901395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER+ HER2- breast cancer: response prediction based on immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics.
    Lips EH; Mulder L; de Ronde JJ; Mandjes IA; Vincent A; Vrancken Peeters MT; Nederlof PM; Wesseling J; Rodenhuis S
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Feb; 131(3):827-36. PubMed ID: 21472434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gene expression profiles of breast cancer obtained from core cut biopsies before neoadjuvant docetaxel, adriamycin, and cyclophoshamide chemotherapy correlate with routine prognostic markers and could be used to identify predictive signatures.
    Rody A; Karn T; Gätje R; Kourtis K; Minckwitz G; Loibl S; Munnes M; Ruckhäberle E; Holtrich U; Kaufmann M; Ahr A
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 2006 Apr; 128(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 16673249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of molecular subtyping with BluePrint, MammaPrint, and TargetPrint to local clinical subtyping in breast cancer patients.
    Nguyen B; Cusumano PG; Deck K; Kerlin D; Garcia AA; Barone JL; Rivera E; Yao K; de Snoo FA; van den Akker J; Stork-Sloots L; Generali D
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Oct; 19(10):3257-63. PubMed ID: 22965266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gene expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and microtubule-associated protein Tau in high-risk early breast cancer: a quest for molecular predictors of treatment benefit in the context of a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group trial.
    Pentheroudakis G; Kalogeras KT; Wirtz RM; Grimani I; Zografos G; Gogas H; Stropp U; Pectasides D; Skarlos D; Hennig G; Samantas E; Bafaloukos D; Papakostas P; Kalofonos HP; Pavlidis N; Fountzilas G
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Jul; 116(1):131-43. PubMed ID: 18668363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Clinical characteristics and survival in the operable breast cancer patients with different molecular subtypes].
    Zhang HM; Zhang BN; Xuan LX; Zhao P
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2009 Jun; 31(6):447-51. PubMed ID: 19950556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Molecular subtyping of early-stage breast cancer identifies a group of patients who do not benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    Glück S; de Snoo F; Peeters J; Stork-Sloots L; Somlo G
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Jun; 139(3):759-67. PubMed ID: 23756626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Immunohistochemical surrogate markers of breast cancer molecular classes predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a single institutional experience with 359 cases.
    Bhargava R; Beriwal S; Dabbs DJ; Ozbek U; Soran A; Johnson RR; Brufsky AM; Lembersky BC; Ahrendt GM
    Cancer; 2010 Mar; 116(6):1431-9. PubMed ID: 20131351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characterization of breast cancer subtypes by quantitative assessment of biological parameters: relationship with clinicopathological characteristics, biological features and prognosis.
    Del Casar JM; Martín A; García C; Corte MD; Alvarez A; Junquera S; González LO; Bongera M; García-Muñiz JL; Allende MT; Vizoso F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Dec; 141(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 18768247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters: a potentially useful method for disease characterization.
    Basu S; Chen W; Tchou J; Mavi A; Cermik T; Czerniecki B; Schnall M; Alavi A
    Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(5):995-1000. PubMed ID: 18098228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic and therapeutic implications of distinct kinase expression patterns in different subtypes of breast cancer.
    Bianchini G; Iwamoto T; Qi Y; Coutant C; Shiang CY; Wang B; Santarpia L; Valero V; Hortobagyi GN; Symmans WF; Gianni L; Pusztai L
    Cancer Res; 2010 Nov; 70(21):8852-62. PubMed ID: 20959472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. HER2 expression and efficacy of preoperative paclitaxel/FAC chemotherapy in breast cancer.
    Andre F; Mazouni C; Liedtke C; Kau SW; Frye D; Green M; Gonzalez-Angulo AM; Symmans WF; Hortobagyi GN; Pusztai L
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Mar; 108(2):183-90. PubMed ID: 17468948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical and pathological response to primary chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer grouped according to hormonal receptors, Her2 status, grading and Ki-67 proliferation index.
    Miglietta L; Vanella P; Canobbio L; Parodi MA; Guglielmini P; Boccardo F
    Anticancer Res; 2009 May; 29(5):1621-5. PubMed ID: 19443376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prognostic significance of molecular classification of breast invasive ductal carcinoma.
    Muñoz M; Fernández-Aceñero MJ; Martín S; Schneider J
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 19082617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of a new classification to a breast tumor series from a population-based cancer registry: demographic, clinical, and prognostic features of incident cases, Palermo Province, 2002-2004 .
    Zarcone M; Amodio R; Campisi I; Cusimano R; Dolcemascolo C; Miceli V; Traina A; Macaluso M
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Feb; 1155():222-6. PubMed ID: 19250207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is triple negative a prognostic factor in breast cancer?
    Nishimura R; Arima N
    Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 18369692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. alphaB-crystallin is a novel predictor of resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.
    Ivanov O; Chen F; Wiley EL; Keswani A; Diaz LK; Memmel HC; Rademaker A; Gradishar WJ; Morrow M; Khan SA; Cryns VL
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Oct; 111(3):411-7. PubMed ID: 17968656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tumor marker phenotype concordance in second primary breast cancer, California, 1999-2004.
    Brown M; Bauer K; Pare M
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Feb; 120(1):217-27. PubMed ID: 19629680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.