These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19670322)

  • 1. Effects of high-pass filtering on MUAP metrics.
    Brownell AA; Bromberg MB
    Muscle Nerve; 2009 Dec; 40(6):1008-11. PubMed ID: 19670322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of standard and pediatric size concentric needle EMG electrodes.
    Brownell AA; Bromberg MB
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 May; 118(5):1162-5. PubMed ID: 17382584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of intramuscular needle position on motor unit action potential metrics.
    Brownell AA; Bromberg MB
    Muscle Nerve; 2007 Apr; 35(4):465-70. PubMed ID: 17221877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Skill and selection bias has least influence on motor unit action potential firing rate/frequency.
    Chu J; Takehara I; Li TC; Schwartz I
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2003; 43(7):387-92. PubMed ID: 14626717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Motor unit action potential (MUAP) parameters affected by editing duration cursors.
    Takehara I; Chu J; Schwartz I; Aye HH
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2004; 44(5):265-9. PubMed ID: 15378864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative motor unit action potentials (QMUAP) in whiplash patients with neck and upper-limb pain.
    Chu J; Eun SS; Schwartz I
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2005; 45(6):323-8. PubMed ID: 16315969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital filter design for peak detection of surface EMG.
    Xu Z; Xiao S
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2000 Aug; 10(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 10969201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "Facial" and standard concentric needle electrodes are not interchangeable.
    Barkhaus PE; Roberts MM; Nandedkar SD
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Sep; 46(5):259-61. PubMed ID: 17059096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel method for automated EMG decomposition and MUAP classification.
    Katsis CD; Goletsis Y; Likas A; Fotiadis DI; Sarmas I
    Artif Intell Med; 2006 May; 37(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 16377160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simulation and analysis of the electromyographic interference pattern in normal muscle. Part II: Activity, upper centile amplitude, and number of small segments.
    Nandedkar SD; Sanders DB; Stålberg EV
    Muscle Nerve; 1986; 9(6):486-90. PubMed ID: 3736582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simulation and analysis of the electromyographic interference pattern in normal muscle. Part I: Turns and amplitude measurements.
    Nandedkar SD; Sanders DB; Stålberg EV
    Muscle Nerve; 1986 Jun; 9(5):423-30. PubMed ID: 3724788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Principal component analysis of the features of concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentials.
    Nandedkar SD; Sanders DB
    Muscle Nerve; 1989 Apr; 12(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 2770781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of analog filtering on brain stem auditory-evoked potentials in dogs.
    Kawasaki Y; Inada S
    Am J Vet Res; 1992 Jul; 53(7):1096-100. PubMed ID: 1497176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automatic decomposition of multichannel intramuscular EMG signals.
    Florestal JR; Mathieu PA; McGill KC
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Feb; 19(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 17513128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of three algorithms for multi-motor unit detection and waveform marking.
    Brownell AA; Ni O; Bromberg MB
    Muscle Nerve; 2006 Apr; 33(4):538-45. PubMed ID: 16382444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anal sphincter electromyography: editing of sampled motor unit action potentials.
    Gregory WT; Clark AL; Johnson J; Willis K; Stuyvesant A; Lou JS
    Muscle Nerve; 2005 Feb; 31(2):256-9. PubMed ID: 15468053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the selection of concentric needle electromyogram motor unit action potentials: is the rise time criterion too restrictive?
    Barkhaus PE; Nandedkar SD
    Muscle Nerve; 1996 Dec; 19(12):1554-60. PubMed ID: 8941269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. EMGTools, an adaptive and versatile tool for detailed EMG analysis.
    Nikolic M; Krarup C
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Oct; 58(10):2707-18. PubMed ID: 20699205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reference values of motor unit action potentials obtained with multi-MUAP analysis.
    Bischoff C; Stålberg E; Falck B; Eeg-Olofsson KE
    Muscle Nerve; 1994 Aug; 17(8):842-51. PubMed ID: 8041391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in motor unit action potential parameters in monopolar recordings related to filter settings of the EMG amplifier.
    Chu J; Chen RC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1985 Sep; 66(9):601-4. PubMed ID: 4038025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.