These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19670473)
1. ITT: a tool to demonstrate muscle inactivation rather than to calculate a percentage of activation. Racinais S; Girard O J Appl Physiol (1985); 2009 Jul; 107(1):361; discussion 367-8. PubMed ID: 19670473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The interpolated twitch technique may be valid and reliable but limited. Behm DG J Appl Physiol (1985); 2009 Jul; 107(1):362; discussion 367-8. PubMed ID: 19670475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement of maximum muscle activation with the interpolated twitch technique. Folland JP J Appl Physiol (1985); 2009 Jul; 107(1):365-6; discussion 367-8. PubMed ID: 19670485 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Twitch interpolation a valid measure with misinterpreted meaning. Jakobi JM J Appl Physiol (1985); 2009 Jul; 107(1):362-3; discussion 367-8. PubMed ID: 19670477 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The interpolated twitch technique may be valid and reliable but limited. Lexell J; Miller M J Appl Physiol (1985); 2009 Jul; 107(1):362; discussion 367-8. PubMed ID: 19670476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Twitch interpolation represents muscle activation in a qualitative manner only. Herzog W J Appl Physiol (1985); 2009 Jul; 107(1):360-1; discussion 367-8. PubMed ID: 19670471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Point: the interpolated twitch does/does not provide a valid measure of the voluntary activation of muscle. Taylor JL J Appl Physiol (1985); 2009 Jul; 107(1):354-5. PubMed ID: 18801954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between surface electrodes and ultrasound monitoring to measure TMS evoked muscle contraction. Kaczmarczyk I; Rawji V; Rothwell JC; Hodson-Tole E; Sharma N Muscle Nerve; 2021 May; 63(5):724-729. PubMed ID: 33533504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maximal rate of force development can represent a more functional measure of muscle activation. Girard O; Millet G J Appl Physiol (1985); 2009 Jul; 107(1):359-60; discussion 367-8. PubMed ID: 19670469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Counterpoint: the interpolated twitch does not provide a valid measure of the voluntary activation of muscle. de Haan A; Gerrits KH; de Ruiter CJ J Appl Physiol (1985); 2009 Jul; 107(1):355-7; discussion 357-8. PubMed ID: 19567806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]