These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19671102)

  • 1. The use of narrative evidence and explicit likelihood by decisionmakers varying in numeracy.
    Dieckmann NF; Slovic P; Peters EM
    Risk Anal; 2009 Oct; 29(10):1473-88. PubMed ID: 19671102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of Anti- Versus Pro-Vaccine Narratives on Responses by Recipients Varying in Numeracy: A Cross-sectional Survey-Based Experiment.
    Bruine de Bruin W; Wallin A; Parker AM; Strough J; Hanmer J
    Med Decis Making; 2017 Nov; 37(8):860-870. PubMed ID: 28474962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of presenting imprecise probabilities in intelligence forecasts.
    Dieckmann NF; Mauro R; Slovic P
    Risk Anal; 2010 Jun; 30(6):987-1001. PubMed ID: 20409043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Informing patients: the influence of numeracy, framing, and format of side effect information on risk perceptions.
    Peters E; Hart PS; Fraenkel L
    Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 21191122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of different graphical and numerical likelihood formats on perception of likelihood and choice.
    Oudhoff JP; Timmermans DR
    Med Decis Making; 2015 May; 35(4):487-500. PubMed ID: 25769496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Numbers matter to informed patient choices: a randomized design across age and numeracy levels.
    Peters E; Hart PS; Tusler M; Fraenkel L
    Med Decis Making; 2014 May; 34(4):430-42. PubMed ID: 24246563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of narrative reports about vaccine adverse events and bias-awareness disclaimers on vaccine decisions: a simulation of an online patient social network.
    Betsch C; Renkewitz F; Haase N
    Med Decis Making; 2013 Jan; 33(1):14-25. PubMed ID: 22875721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Money matters (especially if you are good at math): Numeracy, verbal intelligence, education, and income in satisfaction judgments.
    Bjälkebring P; Peters E
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0259331. PubMed ID: 34818354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Numeracy and decision making.
    Peters E; Västfjäll D; Slovic P; Mertz CK; Mazzocco K; Dickert S
    Psychol Sci; 2006 May; 17(5):407-13. PubMed ID: 16683928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Communicating weather forecast uncertainty: Do individual differences matter?
    Grounds MA; Joslyn SL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Mar; 24(1):18-33. PubMed ID: 29595302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. At Home on the Range? Lay Interpretations of Numerical Uncertainty Ranges.
    Dieckmann NF; Peters E; Gregory R
    Risk Anal; 2015 Jul; 35(7):1281-95. PubMed ID: 25808952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Numeracy among trainees: are we preparing physicians for evidence-based medicine?
    Johnson TV; Abbasi A; Schoenberg ED; Kellum R; Speake LD; Spiker C; Foust A; Kreps A; Ritenour CW; Brawley OW; Master VA
    J Surg Educ; 2014; 71(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 24602712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do clinicians convey what they intend? Lay interpretation of verbal risk labels used in decision encounters.
    Kunneman M; Stiggelbout AM; Pieterse AH
    Patient Educ Couns; 2020 Feb; 103(2):418-422. PubMed ID: 31492531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving risk literacy in surgeons.
    Garcia-Retamero R; Cokely ET; Wicki B; Joeris A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Jul; 99(7):1156-1161. PubMed ID: 26879804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Numeracy moderates the influence of task-irrelevant affect on probability weighting.
    Traczyk J; Fulawka K
    Cognition; 2016 Jun; 151():37-41. PubMed ID: 26968007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices.
    Hawley ST; Zikmund-Fisher B; Ubel P; Jancovic A; Lucas T; Fagerlin A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):448-55. PubMed ID: 18755566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of risk communication formats on risk perception depending on numeracy.
    Keller C; Siegrist M
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 19525484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of numeracy on reactions to different graphic risk presentation formats: An experimental analogue study.
    Wright AJ; Whitwell SC; Takeichi C; Hankins M; Marteau TM
    Br J Health Psychol; 2009 Feb; 14(Pt 1):107-25. PubMed ID: 18442447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Numeracy and the perception and communication of risk.
    Peters E
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Apr; 1128():1-7. PubMed ID: 18469208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining forecasts from advisors: The impact of advice independence and verbal versus numeric format.
    Strueder JD; Windschitl PD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Aug; 153(8):2088-2099. PubMed ID: 39101908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.