375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19671591)
61. Rapporteur Report: ICNIRP international workshop on EMF dosimetry and biophysical aspects relevant to setting exposure guidelines.
Roy CR
Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):658-67. PubMed ID: 17495669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Health hazards of mobile phones: an Indian perspective.
Kapdi M; Hoskote SS; Joshi SR
J Assoc Physicians India; 2008 Nov; 56():893-7. PubMed ID: 19263689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. In-situ measurement procedures for temporal RF electromagnetic field exposure of the general public.
Joseph W; Verloock L; Tanghe E; Martens L
Health Phys; 2009 May; 96(5):529-42. PubMed ID: 19359846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Hearing aids' electromagnetic immunity to environmental RF fields.
Facta S; Benedetto A; Anglesio L; d'Amore G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(4):349-53. PubMed ID: 15550700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Mobile phones. precautionary options.
Black DR
Med Lav; 2006; 97(2):221-5. PubMed ID: 17017353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. SAR distribution in human beings when using body-worn RF transmitters.
Christ A; Samaras T; Neufeld E; Klingenböck A; Kuster N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 124(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 17652110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Effect of mobile phone station on micronucleus frequency and chromosomal aberrations in human blood cells.
Yildirim MS; Yildirim A; Zamani AG; Okudan N
Genet Couns; 2010; 21(2):243-51. PubMed ID: 20681227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Personal exposure to mobile phone frequencies and well-being in adults: a cross-sectional study based on dosimetry.
Thomas S; Kühnlein A; Heinrich S; Praml G; Nowak D; von Kries R; Radon K
Bioelectromagnetics; 2008 Sep; 29(6):463-70. PubMed ID: 18393264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. E-field assessment errors associated with RF dosemeters for different angles of arrival.
Bahillo A; Blas J; Fernández P; Lorenzo RM; Mazuelas S; Abril EJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 18927131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Determinants of mobile phone output power in a multinational study: implications for exposure assessment.
Vrijheid M; Mann S; Vecchia P; Wiart J; Taki M; Ardoino L; Armstrong BK; Auvinen A; Bédard D; Berg-Beckhoff G; Brown J; Chetrit A; Collatz-Christensen H; Combalot E; Cook A; Deltour I; Feychting M; Giles GG; Hepworth SJ; Hours M; Iavarone I; Johansen C; Krewski D; Kurttio P; Lagorio S; Lönn S; McBride M; Montestrucq L; Parslow RC; Sadetzki S; Schüz J; Tynes T; Woodward A; Cardis E
Occup Environ Med; 2009 Oct; 66(10):664-71. PubMed ID: 19465409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Determination of exposure due to mobile phone base stations in an epidemiological study.
Neitzke HP; Osterhoff J; Peklo K; Voigt H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 124(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 17878148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Determination of safety distance limits for a human near a cellular base station antenna, adopting the IEEE standard or ICNIRP guidelines.
Cooper J; Marx B; Buhl J; Hombach V
Bioelectromagnetics; 2002 Sep; 23(6):429-43. PubMed ID: 12210561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Mobile phone base station radiation does not affect neoplastic transformation in BALB/3T3 cells.
Hirose H; Suhara T; Kaji N; Sakuma N; Sekijima M; Nojima T; Miyakoshi J
Bioelectromagnetics; 2008 Jan; 29(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 17694516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Electromagnetic fields (EMF): do they play a role in children's environmental health (CEH)?
Otto M; von Mühlendahl KE
Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2007 Oct; 210(5):635-44. PubMed ID: 17765660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. A numerical evaluation of SAR distribution and temperature changes around a metallic plate in the head of a RF exposed worker.
McIntosh RL; Anderson V; McKenzie RJ
Bioelectromagnetics; 2005 Jul; 26(5):377-88. PubMed ID: 15924346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Electrical stimulation vs thermal effects in a complex electromagnetic environment.
Paniagua JM; Rufo M; Jiménez A; Antolín A; Sánchez M
Sci Total Environ; 2009 Aug; 407(16):4717-22. PubMed ID: 19481236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Electromagnetic exposure compliance estimation using narrowband directional measurements.
Stratakis D; Miaoudakis A; Xenos T; Zacharopoulos V
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(3):331-6. PubMed ID: 18252853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Study of variations of radiofrequency power density from mobile phone base stations with distance.
Ayinmode BO; Farai IP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Oct; 156(4):424-8. PubMed ID: 23625903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Temporal trends of radio-frequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure in everyday environments across European cities.
Urbinello D; Joseph W; Verloock L; Martens L; Röösli M
Environ Res; 2014 Oct; 134():134-42. PubMed ID: 25127524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Workgroup report: base stations and wireless networks-radiofrequency (RF) exposures and health consequences.
Valberg PA; van Deventer TE; Repacholi MH
Environ Health Perspect; 2007 Mar; 115(3):416-24. PubMed ID: 17431492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
