These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19671987)

  • 1. Using classical and modern measurement theories to explore rater, domain, and gender influences on student writing ability.
    Gyagenda IS; Engelhard G
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(3):225-46. PubMed ID: 19671987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Examining rating quality in writing assessment: rater agreement, error, and accuracy.
    Wind SA; Engelhard G
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(4):321-35. PubMed ID: 23270978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multi-faceted Rasch measurement and bias patterns in EFL writing performance assessment.
    He TH; Gou WJ; Chien YC; Chen IS; Chang SM
    Psychol Rep; 2013 Apr; 112(2):469-85. PubMed ID: 23833876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Examining rating scales using Rasch and Mokken models for rater-mediated assessments.
    Wind SA
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(2):100-32. PubMed ID: 24950531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of rater effects on weighted composite scores under nested and spiraled scoring designs, using the multifaceted Rasch model.
    Taherbhai HM; Young MJ
    J Outcome Meas; 2001-2002; 5(1):819-38. PubMed ID: 16320551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Construct validity of scores/measures from a developmental assessment in mathematics using classical and many-facet Rasch measurement.
    Banerji M
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(2):177-98. PubMed ID: 12029177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A method for assessing reflective journal writing.
    Plack MM; Driscoll M; Blissett S; McKenna R; Plack TP
    J Allied Health; 2005; 34(4):199-208. PubMed ID: 16529182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing holistic and analytic scoring for performance assessment with many-facet Rasch model.
    Chi E
    J Appl Meas; 2001; 2(4):379-88. PubMed ID: 12011505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigating gender-related construct-irrelevant components of scores on the written assessment exercise of a high-stakes certification assessment.
    Boulet JR; McKinley DW
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2005; 10(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 15912284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Constructing rater and task banks for performance assessments.
    Engelhard G
    J Outcome Meas; 1997; 1(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 9661713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using the Rasch model in nursing research: an introduction and illustrative example.
    Hagquist C; Bruce M; Gustavsson JP
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Mar; 46(3):380-93. PubMed ID: 19059593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education.
    Downing SM
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2005; 10(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 16078098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of using a scoring guide on essay scores: generalizability theory.
    Kan A
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Dec; 105(3 Pt 1):891-905. PubMed ID: 18229543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative analysis of the ratings in performance assessment using generalizability theory and the many-facet Rasch model.
    Kim SC; Wilson M
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):408-23. PubMed ID: 19934528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detecting and measuring rater effects using many-facet Rasch measurement: Part II.
    Myford CM; Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(2):189-227. PubMed ID: 15064538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analyzing the sources of unreliability in fixed prosthodontics mock board examinations.
    Chambers DW; Loos L
    J Dent Educ; 1997 Apr; 61(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 9158541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the writing of deaf college students: reevaluating a direct assessment of writing.
    Schley S; Albertini J
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2005; 10(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 15585751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The study skills self-efficacy scale for use with Chinese students.
    Yuen M; Smith EV; Dobria L; Fu Q
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(3):266-80. PubMed ID: 19671989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An examination of the measurement properties of the pediatric volitional questionnaire.
    Andersen S; Kielhofner G; Lai JS
    Phys Occup Ther Pediatr; 2005; 25(1-2):39-57. PubMed ID: 15760823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Rasch measurement analysis of the use of cohesive devices in writing English as a foreign language by secondary students in Hong Kong.
    Ho ML; Waugh RF
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(4):331-43. PubMed ID: 19092228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.