106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19672331)
1. A new class of mixture models for differential gene expression in DNA microarray data.
Chen MH; Ibrahim JG; Chi YY
J Stat Plan Inference; 2008 Feb; 138(2):387-404. PubMed ID: 19672331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Confident difference criterion: a new Bayesian differentially expressed gene selection algorithm with applications.
Yu F; Chen MH; Kuo L; Talbott H; Davis JS
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Aug; 16():245. PubMed ID: 26250443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The bimodality index: a criterion for discovering and ranking bimodal signatures from cancer gene expression profiling data.
Wang J; Wen S; Symmans WF; Pusztai L; Coombes KR
Cancer Inform; 2009 Aug; 7():199-216. PubMed ID: 19718451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Bayesian mixture model for metaanalysis of microarray studies.
Conlon EM
Funct Integr Genomics; 2008 Feb; 8(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 17879102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bayesian hierarchical modeling and selection of differentially expressed genes for the EST data.
Yu F; Chen MH; Kuo L; Huang P; Yang W
Biometrics; 2011 Mar; 67(1):142-50. PubMed ID: 20560937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Empirical null distribution based modeling of multi-class differential gene expression detection.
Cao X; Wu B; Hertz MI
J Appl Stat; 2013 Feb; 40(2):347-357. PubMed ID: 23538964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Empirical Bayes ranking and selection methods via semiparametric hierarchical mixture models in microarray studies.
Noma H; Matsui S
Stat Med; 2013 May; 32(11):1904-16. PubMed ID: 23281021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A mixture model for estimating the local false discovery rate in DNA microarray analysis.
Liao JG; Lin Y; Selvanayagam ZE; Shih WJ
Bioinformatics; 2004 Nov; 20(16):2694-701. PubMed ID: 15145810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating effect sizes of differentially expressed genes for power and sample-size assessments in microarray experiments.
Matsui S; Noma H
Biometrics; 2011 Dec; 67(4):1225-35. PubMed ID: 21627629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating the false discovery rate using mixed normal distribution for identifying differentially expressed genes in microarray data analysis.
Hirakawa A; Sato Y; Sozu T; Hamada C; Yoshimura I
Cancer Inform; 2008 Jan; 3():140-8. PubMed ID: 19455258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Semi-parametric differential expression analysis via partial mixture estimation.
Rossell D; Guerra R; Scott C
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2008; 7(1):Article15. PubMed ID: 18454730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A marginal mixture model for selecting differentially expressed genes across two types of tissue samples.
Qiu W; He W; Wang X; Lazarus R
Int J Biostat; 2008 Oct; 4(1):Article 20. PubMed ID: 20231912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A GMM-IG framework for selecting genes as expression panel biomarkers.
Wang M; Chen JY
Artif Intell Med; 2010; 48(2-3):75-82. PubMed ID: 20004087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fully Bayesian mixture model for differential gene expression: simulations and model checks.
Lewin A; Bochkina N; Richardson S
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article36. PubMed ID: 18171320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mixture classification model based on clinical markers for breast cancer prognosis.
Zeng T; Liu J
Artif Intell Med; 2010; 48(2-3):129-37. PubMed ID: 20005686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An empirical bayes adjustment to increase the sensitivity of detecting differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments.
Datta S; Satten GA; Benos DJ; Xia J; Heslin MJ; Datta S
Bioinformatics; 2004 Jan; 20(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 14734315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mixture-model based estimation of gene expression variance from public database improves identification of differentially expressed genes in small sized microarray data.
Kim M; Cho SB; Kim JH
Bioinformatics; 2010 Feb; 26(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 20015947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Human and mouse switch-like genes share common transcriptional regulatory mechanisms for bimodality.
Ertel A; Tozeren A
BMC Genomics; 2008 Dec; 9():628. PubMed ID: 19105848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation between gene expression levels and limitations of the empirical bayes methodology for finding differentially expressed genes.
Qiu X; Klebanov L; Yakovlev A
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2005; 4():Article34. PubMed ID: 16646853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
Datta S; Datta S
Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
