244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19672406)
1. A novel two-step hierarchical quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling work flow for predicting acute toxicity of chemicals in rodents.
Zhu H; Ye L; Richard A; Golbraikh A; Wright FA; Rusyn I; Tropsha A
Environ Health Perspect; 2009 Aug; 117(8):1257-64. PubMed ID: 19672406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of in vitro HTS-derived concentration-response data as biological descriptors improves the accuracy of QSAR models of in vivo toxicity.
Sedykh A; Zhu H; Tang H; Zhang L; Richard A; Rusyn I; Tropsha A
Environ Health Perspect; 2011 Mar; 119(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 20980217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of rat acute toxicity by oral exposure.
Zhu H; Martin TM; Ye L; Sedykh A; Young DM; Tropsha A
Chem Res Toxicol; 2009 Dec; 22(12):1913-21. PubMed ID: 19845371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In Silico Study of In Vitro GPCR Assays by QSAR Modeling.
Mansouri K; Judson RS
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1425():361-81. PubMed ID: 27311474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Oral LD50 toxicity modeling and prediction of per- and polyfluorinated chemicals on rat and mouse.
Bhhatarai B; Gramatica P
Mol Divers; 2011 May; 15(2):467-76. PubMed ID: 20803170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of cell viability assay data improves the prediction accuracy of conventional quantitative structure-activity relationship models of animal carcinogenicity.
Zhu H; Rusyn I; Richard A; Tropsha A
Environ Health Perspect; 2008 Apr; 116(4):506-13. PubMed ID: 18414635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A simple approach for assessment of toxicity of nitroaromatic compounds without using complex descriptors and computer codes.
Keshavarz MH; Akbarzadeh AR
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2019 May; 30(5):347-361. PubMed ID: 31020866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. From QSAR to QSIIR: searching for enhanced computational toxicology models.
Zhu H
Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 930():53-65. PubMed ID: 23086837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ARKA: a framework of dimensionality reduction for machine-learning classification modeling, risk assessment, and data gap-filling of sparse environmental toxicity data.
Banerjee A; Roy K
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2024 Jun; 26(6):991-1007. PubMed ID: 38743054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A three-tier QSAR modeling strategy for estimating eye irritation potential of diverse chemicals in rabbit for regulatory purposes.
Basant N; Gupta S; Singh KP
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Jun; 77():282-91. PubMed ID: 27018829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predicting chemical ocular toxicity using a combinatorial QSAR approach.
Solimeo R; Zhang J; Kim M; Sedykh A; Zhu H
Chem Res Toxicol; 2012 Dec; 25(12):2763-9. PubMed ID: 23148656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative structure-activity-activity and quantitative structure-activity investigations of human and rodent toxicity.
Lessigiarska I; Worth AP; Netzeva TI; Dearden JC; Cronin MT
Chemosphere; 2006 Dec; 65(10):1878-87. PubMed ID: 16714047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Integrative approaches for predicting in vivo effects of chemicals from their structural descriptors and the results of short-term biological assays.
Low YS; Sedykh AY; Rusyn I; Tropsha A
Curr Top Med Chem; 2014; 14(11):1356-64. PubMed ID: 24805064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Towards global QSAR model building for acute toxicity: Munro database case study.
Chavan S; Nicholls IA; Karlsson BC; Rosengren AM; Ballabio D; Consonni V; Todeschini R
Int J Mol Sci; 2014 Oct; 15(10):18162-74. PubMed ID: 25302621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Unveiling first report on in silico modeling of aquatic toxicity of organic chemicals to Labeo rohita (Rohu) employing QSAR and q-RASAR.
Gallagher A; Kar S
Chemosphere; 2024 Feb; 349():140810. PubMed ID: 38029938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictive modeling of chemical hazard by integrating numerical descriptors of chemical structures and short-term toxicity assay data.
Rusyn I; Sedykh A; Low Y; Guyton KZ; Tropsha A
Toxicol Sci; 2012 May; 127(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 22387746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sirc-cvs cytotoxicity test: an alternative for predicting rodent acute systemic toxicity.
Kitagaki M; Wakuri S; Hirota M; Tanaka N; Itagaki H
J Toxicol Sci; 2006 Oct; 31(4):371-9. PubMed ID: 17077590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hierarchical Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Modeling Approach for Integrating Binary, Multiclass, and Regression Models of Acute Oral Systemic Toxicity.
Li X; Kleinstreuer NC; Fourches D
Chem Res Toxicol; 2020 Feb; 33(2):353-366. PubMed ID: 31975586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predicting Organ Toxicity Using in Vitro Bioactivity Data and Chemical Structure.
Liu J; Patlewicz G; Williams AJ; Thomas RS; Shah I
Chem Res Toxicol; 2017 Nov; 30(11):2046-2059. PubMed ID: 28768096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
