These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

456 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19672760)

  • 41. A pdpa laser-based measuring set-up for the characterisation of spray nozzles.
    Nuyttens D; Sonck B; de Schampheleire M; Steurbaut W; Baetens K; Verboven P; Nicolaï B; Ramon H
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):1023-35. PubMed ID: 16628951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Buffer zone and windbreak effects on spray drift deposition in a simulated wetland.
    Brown RB; Carter MH; Stephenson GR
    Pest Manag Sci; 2004 Nov; 60(11):1085-90. PubMed ID: 15532682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Influence of agricultural adjuvants on droplet spectra.
    Spanoghe P; De Schampheleire M; Van der Meeren P; Steurbaut W
    Pest Manag Sci; 2007 Jan; 63(1):4-16. PubMed ID: 17173344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Factors affecting aerial spray drift in the Brazilian Cerrado.
    Baio FHR; Antuniassi UR; Castilho BR; Teodoro PE; Silva EED
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212289. PubMed ID: 30779797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Risk assessment of environmental and bystander exposure from agricultural unmanned aerial vehicle sprayers in golden coconut plantations: Effects of droplet size and spray volume.
    Lan X; Wang J; Chen P; Liang Q; Zhang L; Ma C
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2024 Sep; 282():116675. PubMed ID: 38971099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 3: field drift experiments.
    Nuyttens D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Dekeyser D; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):763-7. PubMed ID: 19226826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A review of ultralow-volume aerial sprays of insecticide for mosquito control.
    Mount GA; Biery TL; Haile DG
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1996 Dec; 12(4):601-18. PubMed ID: 9046465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Safety evaluation and risk assessment of the herbicide Roundup and its active ingredient, glyphosate, for humans.
    Williams GM; Kroes R; Munro IC
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2000 Apr; 31(2 Pt 1):117-65. PubMed ID: 10854122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Drift studies--comparison of field and wind tunnel experiments.
    Stadler R; Regenauer W
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):971-3. PubMed ID: 16628944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Predicted impact of transgenic, herbicidetolerant corn on drinking water quality in vulnerable watersheds of the mid-western USA.
    Wauchope RD; Estes TL; Allen R; Baker JL; Hornsby AG; Jones RL; Richards RP; Gustafson DI
    Pest Manag Sci; 2002 Feb; 58(2):146-60. PubMed ID: 11852639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Simulated glyphosate drift influences nitrate assimilation and nitrogen fixation in non-glyphosate-resistant soybean.
    Bellaloui N; Reddy KN; Zablotowicz RM; Mengistu A
    J Agric Food Chem; 2006 May; 54(9):3357-64. PubMed ID: 16637696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Acute toxicity and sublethal effects of the mixture glyphosate (Roundup Active) and Cosmo-Flux 411F to anuran embryos and tadpoles of four Colombian species.
    Henao Muñoz LM; Montes Rojas CM; Bernal Bautista MH
    Rev Biol Trop; 2015 Mar; 63(1):223-33. PubMed ID: 26299127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Spray drift as affected by meteorological conditions.
    Nuyttens D; Sonck B; de Schampheleire M; Steurbaut W; Baetens K; Verboven P; Nicolaï B; Ramon H
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):947-59. PubMed ID: 16628942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effects of spray drift of glyphosate on nontarget terrestrial plants-A critical review.
    Cederlund H
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2017 Nov; 36(11):2879-2886. PubMed ID: 28731230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Influence of aircraft vortices on spray cloud behavior.
    Mickle RE
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1996 Jun; 12(2 Pt 2):372-9. PubMed ID: 8827623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Efficacy of aerial spray applications using fuselage booms on Air Force C-130H aircraft against mosquitoes and biting midges.
    Breidenbaugh MS; Haagsma KA; Wojcik GM; De Szalay FA
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2009 Dec; 25(4):467-73. PubMed ID: 20099594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Simulation of drift of pesticides: development and validation of a model.
    Brusselman E; Spanoghe P; Van der Meeren P; Gabriels D; Steurbaut W
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2003; 68(4 Pt B):749-58. PubMed ID: 15151311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Particle Size Characterization of Agricultural Sprays Collected on Personal Air Monitoring Samplers.
    Flack SL; Ledson TM; Ramanarayanan TS
    J Agric Saf Health; 2019 Apr; 25(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 32429610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The Washington aerial spray drift study: children's exposure to methamidophos in an agricultural community following fixed-wing aircraft applications.
    Weppner S; Elgethun K; Lu C; Hebert V; Yost MG; Fenske RA
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2006 Sep; 16(5):387-96. PubMed ID: 16249796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Assessing the potential spray drift of a six-rotor unmanned aerial vehicle sprayer using a test bench and airborne drift collectors under low wind velocities: impact of atomization characteristics and application parameters.
    Wongsuk S; Zhu Z; Zheng A; Qi P; Li Y; Huang Z; Han H; Wang C; He X
    Pest Manag Sci; 2024 Dec; 80(12):6053-6067. PubMed ID: 39030971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.