These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. [Prognostic value of chosen parameters of mechanical and bioelectrical uterine activity in prediction of threatening preterm labour]. Zietek J; Sikora J; Horoba K; Matonia A; Jezewski J; Magnucki J; Kobielska L Ginekol Pol; 2009 Mar; 80(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 19382611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical Use of Electrohysterography During Term Labor: A Systematic Review on Diagnostic Value, Advantages, and Limitations. Vlemminx MWC; Rabotti C; van der Hout-van der Jagt MB; Oei SG Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2018 May; 73(5):303-324. PubMed ID: 29850920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of 3 methods. Euliano TY; Nguyen MT; Darmanjian S; McGorray SP; Euliano N; Onkala A; Gregg AR Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 208(1):66.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23122926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated electrohysterographic detection of uterine contractions for monitoring of pregnancy: feasibility and prospects. Muszynski C; Happillon T; Azudin K; Tylcz JB; Istrate D; Marque C BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 May; 18(1):136. PubMed ID: 29739438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Electrohysterography. A promising alternative for monitoring contractions]. Vlemminx MW; de Lau H; Vullings R; Peters CH; Oei SG Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2015; 159():A8535. PubMed ID: 25650036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison between electrical uterine monitor, tocodynamometer and intra uterine pressure catheter for uterine activity in labor. Hadar E; Biron-Shental T; Gavish O; Raban O; Yogev Y J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Aug; 28(12):1367-74. PubMed ID: 25123517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation of external and internal monitoring of uterine activity in a cohort of term patients. Miles AM; Monga M; Richeson KS Am J Perinatol; 2001 May; 18(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 11414523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of surface acquired uterine electromyography and intrauterine pressure catheter to assess uterine activity. Haran G; Elbaz M; Fejgin MD; Biron-Shental T Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 206(5):412.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22284960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monitoring Uterine Activity during Labor: Clinician Interpretation of Electrohysterography versus Intrauterine Pressure Catheter and Tocodynamometry. Euliano TY; Nguyen MT; Darmanjian S; Busowski JD; Euliano N; Gregg AR Am J Perinatol; 2016 Jul; 33(9):831-8. PubMed ID: 26960704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multi-channel electrohysterography enabled uterine contraction characterization and its effect in delivery assessment. Shen J; Liu Y; Zhang M; Pumir A; Mu L; Li B; Xu J Comput Biol Med; 2023 Dec; 167():107697. PubMed ID: 37976821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship of measured external tocodynamometry with measured internal uterine activity. Paul MJ; Smeltzer JS Am J Perinatol; 1991 Nov; 8(6):417-20. PubMed ID: 1814307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of internal uterine pressure by joint amplitude and frequency analysis of electrohysterographic signals. Rabotti C; Mischi M; van Laar JO; Oei GS; Bergmans JW Physiol Meas; 2008 Jul; 29(7):829-41. PubMed ID: 18583724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Mechanical and electrical uterine activity. Part I. Contractions monitoring]. Zietek J; Sikora J; Horoba K; Matonia A; Jezewski J; Magnucki J; Kobielska L Ginekol Pol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):791-7. PubMed ID: 19140504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Mechanical and electrical uterine activity. Part II. Contractions parameters]. Zietek J; Sikora J; Horoba K; Matonia A; Jezewski J; Magnucki J; Kobielska L Ginekol Pol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):798-804. PubMed ID: 19140505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Myometrium electromechanical modeling for internal uterine pressure estimation by electrohysterography. Rabotti C; Mischi M; van Laar JO; Oei SG; Bergmans JW Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():6259-62. PubMed ID: 19963667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]