These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19672792)

  • 1. Is dinoprostone safe? A report of three maternal deaths.
    Dede H; Kandemir O; Yalvaç S; Karçaaltincaba D; Kiykaç S
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Jun; 23(6):569-72. PubMed ID: 19672792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anaphylactoid syndrome of pregnancy after intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening: a report of 3 cases.
    Cusick W; Leuci D; Viscarello RR; Rodis JF
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Mar; 50(3):225-8. PubMed ID: 15841940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Uterine hyperstimulation following cervix ripening with dinoprostone in a vaginal insert system].
    Brouwers JM; Briët JW; Brouwers JR
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2004 Jun; 148(26):1300-3. PubMed ID: 15279216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Labor induction with dinoprostone or oxytocine and postpartum disseminated intravascular coagulation: a hospital-based case-control study.
    De Abajo FJ; Meseguer CM; Antiñolo G; García Rodríguez LA; Montero D; Castillo JR; Torelló J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov; 191(5):1637-43. PubMed ID: 15547535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Uterine hyperstimulation following cervix ripening with dinoprostone in a vaginal insert system].
    Veerman HM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Jan; 149(2):105-6; author reply 106. PubMed ID: 15688844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of patients' satisfaction of cervical ripening using dinoprostone by either intravaginal gel or pessary: an open-label, randomized, prospective study.
    Ferraiolo A; Dellacasa I; Bentivoglio G; Ferrero S; Ragni N
    J Reprod Med; 2010; 55(9-10):423-9. PubMed ID: 21043369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Evaluation of controlled-release dinoprostone Propess for labor induction].
    Mazouni C; Provensal M; Ménard JP; Heckenroth H; Guidicelli B; Gamerre M; Bretelle F
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Jun; 34(6):489-92. PubMed ID: 16713322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
    Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW
    BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Induction of labor and pain: a randomized trial between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix.
    Zanconato G; Bergamini V; Mantovani E; Carlin R; Bortolami O; Franchi M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 May; 24(5):728-31. PubMed ID: 21351838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Meyer M; Pflum J; Howard D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Elective cervical ripening in women beyond the 290th day of pregnancy: a randomized trial comparing 2 dinoprostone preparations.
    Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Fazzio M; Volpe A
    J Reprod Med; 2007 Oct; 52(10):945-9. PubMed ID: 17977171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intravaginal glyceryl trinitrate and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
    Nunes FP; Campos AP; Pedroso SR; Leite CF; Avillez TP; Rodrigues RD; Meirinho M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 194(4):1022-6. PubMed ID: 16580291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized controlled trial of 24-hour vaginal dinoprostone pessary compared to gel for induction of labor in term pregnancies with a Bishop score < or = 4.
    Triglia MT; Palamara F; Lojacono A; Prefumo F; Frusca T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May; 89(5):651-7. PubMed ID: 20199360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Medical indications of labor induction: a comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and intravenous prostaglandin E2].
    Jouatte F; Subtil D; Marquis P; Plennevaux JL; Puech F
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2000 Dec; 29(8):763-771. PubMed ID: 11139713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial.
    Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Verocchi G; Volpe A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Pharmacological induction of labour: benefits and risks].
    Romanelli M; Ribiani E; Burnelli L; Luzi G; Affronti G; Di Renzo GC
    Minerva Ginecol; 2007 Aug; 59(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 17923826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Neiger R; Greaves PC
    Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized trial that compared intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal insert in pregnancies at high risk of fetal distress.
    Rozenberg P; Chevret S; Sénat MV; Bretelle F; Paule Bonnal A; Ville Y
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 191(1):247-53. PubMed ID: 15295374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.