These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19672792)
21. Uterine rupture with the use of PGE2 vaginal inserts for labor induction in women with previous cesarean sections. Taylor DR; Doughty AS; Kaufman H; Yang L; Iannucci TA J Reprod Med; 2002 Jul; 47(7):549-54. PubMed ID: 12170531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Vaginal misoprostol in managing premature rupture of membranes. Ayad IA East Mediterr Health J; 2002; 8(4-5):515-20. PubMed ID: 15603033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Evidence-based medicine: labor induction with prostaglandins]. Winkler M; Rath W Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 1999 Dec; 203 Suppl 2():6-11. PubMed ID: 10612191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Comparing two Prepidil gel regimens for cervical ripening before induction of labor at term: a randomized trial]. Fekih M; Ben Zina N; Jnifen A; Nouri S; Ben Regaya L; Memmi A; Bouguizene S; Chaieb A; Bibi M; Sboui H; Khairi H J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2009 Jun; 38(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 19467806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Induction of labour: a comparison between controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal pessary (Cervidil) and dinoprostone intravaginal gel (Prostin E2). Kho EM; Sadler L; McCowan L Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 48(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 19032662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Oral misoprostol against vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a randomized comparison]. Henrich W; Dudenhausen JW; Hanel C; Chen FC Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2008 Oct; 212(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 18956276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Study of the effect of Propess for ripening of the unfavorable cervix for the induction of labor due to medical indications]. Nikolov A; Dimitrov A; KrÅsteva K; Nashar S Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2003; 42(3):5-8. PubMed ID: 12858482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparative study of misoprostol vs dinoprostone for induction of labour. Kulshreshtha S; Sharma P; Mohan G; Singh S; Singh S Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2007; 51(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 17877293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Prostaglandin E2--an effective alternative for the induction of labor]. Bozhinova S; Porozhanova V; Popovski K; Bozhinov P; Atanasova S Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1995; 34(3):1-4. PubMed ID: 8743832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction. Prager M; Eneroth-Grimfors E; Edlund M; Marions L BJOG; 2008 Oct; 115(11):1443-50. PubMed ID: 18715244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction. Ramsey PS; Savage K; Lincoln T; Owen J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15229013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinical experience with a controlled-release, prostaglandin E2 intravaginal insert in the USA. Rayburn WF Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Oct; 104 Suppl 15():8-12; discussion 20-5. PubMed ID: 9366721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. A comparison of spontaneous labor with induced vaginal tablets prostaglandin E2 in grand multiparae. Sobande AA; Al-Bar HM; Archibong EI Saudi Med J; 2001 Aug; 22(8):698-701. PubMed ID: 11573116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Dinoprostone vaginal pessary for induction of labour: safety of use for up to 24 h. Tathem K; Harris LJ; O'Rourke P; Kimble RM Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Dec; 52(6):582-7. PubMed ID: 23004009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Dinoprostone: slow release vaginal insert (Propess) and intracervical gel (Prepidil) for the induction of labour with unriped cervix]. Grignaffini A; Soncini E; Anfuso S; Ronzoni E Minerva Ginecol; 2004 Oct; 56(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 15531859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Intravaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone as cervical ripening and labor-inducing agents. Fletcher H; Mitchell S; Frederick J; Simeon D; Brown D Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 83(2):244-7. PubMed ID: 8290188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Induction of labour with intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel: a comparative study. Nanda S; Singhal SR; Papneja A Trop Doct; 2007 Jan; 37(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 17326881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Intravaginal dinoprostone versus intra cervical foley catheter for induction of labor. Jalilian N; Fakheri T; Ghadami MR Acta Med Iran; 2011; 49(12):831. PubMed ID: 22174175 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Rupture of an unscarred uterus at full term after an intracervical application of dinoprostone (Prepidil) gel]. Heckel S; Ohl J; Dellenbach P Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Mar; 88(3):162-4. PubMed ID: 8493447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Abruptio placentae associated with misoprostol use in women with preeclampsia. Fontenot MT; Lewis DF; Barton CB; Jones EM; Moore JA; Evans AT J Reprod Med; 2005 Sep; 50(9):653-8. PubMed ID: 16363752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]