701 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19672839)
1. A comparison of model choices for the Continual Reassessment Method in phase I cancer trials.
Paoletti X; Kramar A
Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):3012-28. PubMed ID: 19672839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal phase I dose-escalation trial designs in oncology--a simulation study.
Gerke O; Siedentop H
Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5329-44. PubMed ID: 17849502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flexible Bayesian methods for cancer phase I clinical trials. Dose escalation with overdose control.
Tighiouart M; Rogatko A; Babb JS
Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(14):2183-96. PubMed ID: 15909291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retrospective robustness of the continual reassessment method.
O'Quigley J; Zohar S
J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Sep; 20(5):1013-25. PubMed ID: 20721788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adaptive designs for dose-finding in non-cancer phase II trials: influence of early unexpected outcomes.
Resche-Rigon M; Zohar S; Chevret S
Clin Trials; 2008; 5(6):595-606. PubMed ID: 19029208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dose-cohort designs in cancer phase I trials.
Huang B; Chappell R
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2070-93. PubMed ID: 17764082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Designing dose-escalation trials with late-onset toxicities using the time-to-event continual reassessment method.
Normolle D; Lawrence T
J Clin Oncol; 2006 Sep; 24(27):4426-33. PubMed ID: 16983110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A model-based approach in the estimation of the maximum tolerated dose in phase I cancer clinical trials.
He W; Liu J; Binkowitz B; Quan H
Stat Med; 2006 Jun; 25(12):2027-42. PubMed ID: 16025542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A two-stage algorithm for designing phase I cancer clinical trials for two new molecular entities.
Su Z
Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Jan; 31(1):105-7. PubMed ID: 19879974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dose-escalation designs in oncology: ADEPT and the CRM.
Shu J; O'Quigley J
Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5345-53; discussion 5354-5. PubMed ID: 18752259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Posterior maximization and averaging for Bayesian working model choice in the continual reassessment method.
Daimon T; Zohar S; O'Quigley J
Stat Med; 2011 Jun; 30(13):1563-73. PubMed ID: 21351288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Small-sample behavior of novel phase I cancer trial designs.
Oron AP; Hoff PD
Clin Trials; 2013 Feb; 10(1):63-80. PubMed ID: 23345304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A hybrid Bayesian adaptive design for dose response trials.
Chang M; Chow SC
J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(4):677-91. PubMed ID: 16022172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A two-stage dose selection strategy in phase I trials with wide dose ranges.
Wang O; Faries DE
J Biopharm Stat; 2000 Aug; 10(3):319-33. PubMed ID: 10959914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved designs for dose escalation studies using pharmacokinetic measurements.
Piantadosi S; Liu G
Stat Med; 1996 Aug; 15(15):1605-18. PubMed ID: 8858785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The continual reassessment method for multiple toxicity grades: a Bayesian quasi-likelihood approach.
Yuan Z; Chappell R; Bailey H
Biometrics; 2007 Mar; 63(1):173-9. PubMed ID: 17447942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimating the probability of toxicity at the recommended dose following a phase I clinical trial in cancer.
O'Quigley J
Biometrics; 1992 Sep; 48(3):853-62. PubMed ID: 1420845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An optimization algorithm for designing phase I cancer clinical trials.
Jiang H; Liu Y; Su Z
Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Mar; 29(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 17681867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Choice of designs and doses for early phase trials.
Zhou Y
Fundam Clin Pharmacol; 2004 Jun; 18(3):373-8. PubMed ID: 15147290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Bayesian evaluation of enrolling additional patients at the maximum tolerated dose in Phase I trials.
Gönen M
Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Apr; 26(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 15837436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
