BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

557 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19672840)

  • 1. Performance of analytical methods for overdispersed counts in cluster randomized trials: sample size, degree of clustering and imbalance.
    Durán Pacheco G; Hattendorf J; Colford JM; Mäusezahl D; Smith T
    Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):2989-3011. PubMed ID: 19672840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating relative risks in multicenter studies with a small number of centers - which methods to use? A simulation study.
    Pedroza C; Truong VTT
    Trials; 2017 Nov; 18(1):512. PubMed ID: 29096682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes.
    Westgate PM
    Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Small sample performance of bias-corrected sandwich estimators for cluster-randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Li P; Redden DT
    Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(2):281-96. PubMed ID: 25345738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of population-averaged and cluster-specific models for the analysis of cluster randomized trials with missing binary outcomes: a simulation study.
    Ma J; Raina P; Beyene J; Thabane L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jan; 13():9. PubMed ID: 23343209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing denominator degrees of freedom approximations for the generalized linear mixed model in analyzing binary outcome in small sample cluster-randomized trials.
    Li P; Redden DT
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Apr; 15():38. PubMed ID: 25899170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An imbalance in cluster sizes does not lead to notable loss of power in cross-sectional, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials with a continuous outcome.
    Kristunas CA; Smith KL; Gray LJ
    Trials; 2017 Mar; 18(1):109. PubMed ID: 28270224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing methods to estimate treatment effects on a continuous outcome in multicentre randomized controlled trials: a simulation study.
    Chu R; Thabane L; Ma J; Holbrook A; Pullenayegum E; Devereaux PJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Feb; 11():21. PubMed ID: 21338524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods.
    Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sample size calculation for cluster randomized trials with zero-inflated count outcomes.
    Zhou Z; Li D; Zhang S
    Stat Med; 2022 May; 41(12):2191-2204. PubMed ID: 35139584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Imputation strategies for missing binary outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
    Ma J; Akhtar-Danesh N; Dolovich L; Thabane L;
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Feb; 11():18. PubMed ID: 21324148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finite-sample corrected generalized estimating equation of population average treatment effects in stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.
    Scott JM; deCamp A; Juraska M; Fay MP; Gilbert PB
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):583-597. PubMed ID: 25267551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How large are the consequences of covariate imbalance in cluster randomized trials: a simulation study with a continuous outcome and a binary covariate at the cluster level.
    Moerbeek M; van Schie S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():79. PubMed ID: 27401771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Appropriate statistical methods for analysing partially nested randomised controlled trials with continuous outcomes: a simulation study.
    Candlish J; Teare MD; Dimairo M; Flight L; Mandefield L; Walters SJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):105. PubMed ID: 30314463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the analysis of composite measures of quality in medical research.
    Moineddin R; Meaney C; Grunfeld E
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):633-660. PubMed ID: 25296866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Likelihood-based random-effects meta-analysis with few studies: empirical and simulation studies.
    Seide SE; Röver C; Friede T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):16. PubMed ID: 30634920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cluster randomised trials with a binary outcome and a small number of clusters: comparison of individual and cluster level analysis method.
    Thompson JA; Leyrat C; Fielding KL; Hayes RJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Aug; 22(1):222. PubMed ID: 35962318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Empirical Bayes models of Poisson clinical trials and sample size determination.
    Zaslavsky BG
    Pharm Stat; 2010; 9(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 19513984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sample size calculation in three-level cluster randomized trials using generalized estimating equation models.
    Liu J; Colditz GA
    Stat Med; 2020 Oct; 39(24):3347-3372. PubMed ID: 32720717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal modeling in community randomized trials with rare events: Utilization of the negative binomial regression model.
    Westgate PM; Cheng DM; Feaster DJ; Fernández S; Shoben AB; Vandergrift N
    Clin Trials; 2022 Apr; 19(2):162-171. PubMed ID: 34991359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.