182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19673187)
1. Dosimetric effects of rotational output variation and x-ray target degradation on helical tomotherapy plans.
Staton RJ; Langen KM; Kupelian PA; Meeks SL
Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):2881-8. PubMed ID: 19673187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Independent calculation of dose distributions for helical tomotherapy using a conventional treatment planning system.
Klüter S; Schubert K; Lissner S; Sterzing F; Oetzel D; Debus J; Schlegel W; Oelfke U; Nill S
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081709. PubMed ID: 25086519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric impacts of gantry angle misalignment on prostate cancer treatment using helical tomotherapy.
Su FC; Shi C; Crownover R; Swanson G; Papanikolaou N
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Aug; 7(4):287-93. PubMed ID: 18642967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Phantomless patient-specific TomoTherapy QA via delivery performance monitoring and a secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation.
Handsfield LL; Jones R; Wilson DD; Siebers JV; Read PW; Chen Q
Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101703. PubMed ID: 25281942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A dosimetric comparison between two intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques: tomotherapy vs dynamic linear accelerator.
Whitelaw GL; Blasiak-Wal I; Cooke K; Usher C; Macdougall ND; Plowman PN
Br J Radiol; 2008 Apr; 81(964):333-40. PubMed ID: 18344277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A planning comparison of dynamic IMRT for different collimator leaf thicknesses with helical tomotherapy and RapidArc for prostate and head and neck tumors.
Jacob V; Bayer W; Astner ST; Busch R; Kneschaurek P
Strahlenther Onkol; 2010 Sep; 186(9):502-10. PubMed ID: 20803184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dose-volume histogram comparison between static 5-field IMRT with 18-MV X-rays and helical tomotherapy with 6-MV X-rays.
Hayashi A; Shibamoto Y; Hattori Y; Tamura T; Iwabuchi M; Otsuka S; Sugie C; Yanagi T
J Radiat Res; 2015 Mar; 56(2):338-45. PubMed ID: 25609741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a comparison of four consensus guidelines and dosimetric evaluation of 3D-CRT versus tomotherapy IMRT.
Malone S; Croke J; Roustan-Delatour N; Belanger E; Avruch L; Malone C; Morash C; Kayser C; Underhill K; Li Y; Malone K; Nyiri B; Spaans J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Nov; 84(3):725-32. PubMed ID: 22444999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Helical tomotherapy versus single-arc intensity-modulated arc therapy: a collaborative dosimetric comparison between two institutions.
Rong Y; Tang G; Welsh JS; Mohiuddin MM; Paliwal B; Yu CX
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Sep; 81(1):284-96. PubMed ID: 21236598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A dosimetric analysis comparing treatment of low-risk prostate cancer with TomoTherapy versus static field intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Shah AP; Chen SS; Strauss JB; Kirk MC; Coleman JL; Coon AB; Miller C; Dickler A
Am J Clin Oncol; 2009 Oct; 32(5):460-6. PubMed ID: 19564784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A dosimetric comparison of tomotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy in the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer with pelvic nodal radiation therapy.
Pasquier D; Cavillon F; Lacornerie T; Touzeau C; Tresch E; Lartigau E
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Feb; 85(2):549-54. PubMed ID: 22677369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative analysis of 60Co intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Fox C; Romeijn HE; Lynch B; Men C; Aleman DM; Dempsey JF
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 53(12):3175-88. PubMed ID: 18506074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiation therapy of post-mastectomy patients with positive nodes using fixed beam tomotherapy.
Jones R; Yang W; Read P; Sheng K
Radiother Oncol; 2011 Aug; 100(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 21641066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric adaptive IMRT driven by fiducial points.
Crijns W; Van Herck H; Defraene G; Van den Bergh L; Slagmolen P; Haustermans K; Maes F; Van den Heuvel F
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061716. PubMed ID: 24877811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A planning and delivery study of a rotational IMRT technique with burst delivery.
Kainz K; Chen GP; Chang YW; Prah D; Sharon Qi X; Shukla HP; Stahl J; Allen Li X
Med Phys; 2011 Sep; 38(9):5104-18. PubMed ID: 21978056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fluence-weighted average subfield size in helical TomoTherapy.
Howitz S; Wiezorek T; Wittig A; Vorwerk H; Zink K
Z Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 29(4):337-348. PubMed ID: 31056376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the role of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) relative to IMRT and helical tomotherapy in the management of localized, locally advanced, and post-operative prostate cancer.
Davidson MT; Blake SJ; Batchelar DL; Cheung P; Mah K
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Aug; 80(5):1550-8. PubMed ID: 21543164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy treatment plans for total marrow irradiation created using GPU and CPU dose calculation engines.
Nalichowski A; Burmeister J
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071716. PubMed ID: 23822420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Commissioning of intensity modulated neutron radiotherapy (IMNRT).
Burmeister J; Spink R; Liang L; Bossenberger T; Halford R; Brandon J; Delauter J; Snyder M
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021718. PubMed ID: 23387741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
