188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19673189)
1. An exposure indicator for digital radiography: AAPM Task Group 116 (executive summary).
Shepard SJ; Wang J; Flynn M; Gingold E; Goldman L; Krugh K; Leong DL; Mah E; Ogden K; Peck D; Samei E; Wang J; Willis CE
Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):2898-914. PubMed ID: 19673189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Digital chest x-rays with a selenium detector: a prospective comparison with a conventional film-screen combination].
Freund M; Reuter M; Palmié S; Harder E; Hutzelmann A; Heller M
Rofo; 1997 Feb; 166(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 9116250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of a photostimulable phosphor system with film for dental radiology.
Huda W; Rill LN; Benn DK; Pettigrew JC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Jun; 83(6):725-31. PubMed ID: 9195631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Image quality of a digital chest radiography system based on a selenium detector.
Neitzel U; Maack I; Günther-Kohfahl S
Med Phys; 1994 Apr; 21(4):509-16. PubMed ID: 8058016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of aluminum-copper alloy filtration on photon spectra, air kerma rate and image contrast.
Gonçalves A; Rollo JM; Gonçalves M; Haiter Neto F; Bóscolo FN
Braz Dent J; 2004; 15(3):214-9. PubMed ID: 15798826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neonatal digital chest radiography- should we be using additional copper filtration?
Tugwell-Allsup JR; Morris RW; Thomas K; Hibbs R; England A
Br J Radiol; 2022 Feb; 95(1130):20211026. PubMed ID: 34797726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Chest radiography with a large-area detector based on cesium-iodide/amorphous-silicon technology: image quality and dose requirement in comparison with an asymmetric screen-film system.
Strotzer M; Völk M; Reiser M; Lenhart M; Manke C; Gmeinwieser J; Holzknecht N; Link J; Feuerbach S
J Thorac Imaging; 2000 Jul; 15(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 10928606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.
Hamer OW; Sirlin CB; Strotzer M; Borisch I; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Völk M
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 16192324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chest radiographic image quality: comparison of asymmetric screen-film, digital storage phosphor, and digital selenium drum systems--preliminary study.
Beute GH; Flynn MJ; Eyler WR; Samei E; Spizarny DL; Zylak CJ
Radiographics; 1998; 18(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 9599395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. System considerations in CCD-based x-ray imaging for digital chest radiography and digital mammography.
Hejazi S; Trauernicht DP
Med Phys; 1997 Feb; 24(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 9048370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using aluminum for scatter control in mammography: preliminary work using measurements of CNR and FOM.
Al Khalifah K; Davidson R; Zhou A
Radiol Phys Technol; 2020 Mar; 13(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 31749130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography at different exposure doses versus mammography film: possibility of radiation dose reduction in detecting rheumatologic bone defects.
Zähringer M; Reineck S; Perniok A; Krüger K; Andermahr J; Rubbert A; Winnekendonk G
Acta Radiol; 2008 Mar; 49(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 18300139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Image quality and radiation dose on digital chest imaging: comparison of amorphous silicon and amorphous selenium flat-panel systems.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Vereecken L; De Hauwere A; Duyck P; De Man R; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Sep; 187(3):630-7. PubMed ID: 16928923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Digital radiography: from storage phosphor plates to direct detector systems].
Schaefer-Prokop C; Uffmann M; Stadler A
Wien Med Wochenschr Suppl; 2002; (113):30-4. PubMed ID: 12621834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
Borg E
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
