These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19673211)

  • 1. Methodology for generating a 3D computerized breast phantom from empirical data.
    Li CM; Segars WP; Tourassi GD; Boone JM; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3122-31. PubMed ID: 19673211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Generation of a suite of 3D computer-generated breast phantoms from a limited set of human subject data.
    Hsu CM; Palmeri ML; Segars WP; Veress AI; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):043703. PubMed ID: 23556929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An analysis of the mechanical parameters used for finite element compression of a high-resolution 3D breast phantom.
    Hsu CM; Palmeri ML; Segars WP; Veress AI; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5756-70. PubMed ID: 21992390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison study of reconstruction algorithms for prototype digital breast tomosynthesis using various breast phantoms.
    Kim YS; Park HS; Lee HH; Choi YW; Choi JG; Kim HH; Kim HJ
    Radiol Med; 2016 Feb; 121(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 26383027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of an improved algorithm for producing realistic 3D breast software phantoms: application for mammography.
    Bliznakova K; Suryanarayanan S; Karellas A; Pallikarakis N
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5604-17. PubMed ID: 21158272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The quantitative potential for breast tomosynthesis imaging.
    Shafer CM; Samei E; Lo JY
    Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1004-16. PubMed ID: 20384236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A three-dimensional breast software phantom for mammography simulation.
    Bliznakova K; Bliznakov Z; Bravou V; Kolitsi Z; Pallikarakis N
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Nov; 48(22):3699-719. PubMed ID: 14680268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Normal and pathological NCAT image and phantom data based on physiologically realistic left ventricle finite-element models.
    Veress AI; Segars WP; Weiss JA; Tsui BM; Gullberg GT
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Dec; 25(12):1604-16. PubMed ID: 17167995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simulated scatter performance of an inverse-geometry dedicated breast CT system.
    Bhagtani R; Schmidt TG
    Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):788-96. PubMed ID: 19378739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cardiac motion correction based on partial angle reconstructed images in x-ray CT.
    Kim S; Chang Y; Ra JB
    Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2560-71. PubMed ID: 25979048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finite-element modeling of compression and gravity on a population of breast phantoms for multimodality imaging simulation.
    Sturgeon GM; Kiarashi N; Lo JY; Samei E; Segars WP
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2207. PubMed ID: 27147333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of realistic physical breast phantoms matched to virtual breast phantoms based on human subject data.
    Kiarashi N; Nolte AC; Sturgeon GM; Segars WP; Ghate SV; Nolte LW; Samei E; Lo JY
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4116-26. PubMed ID: 26133612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.
    Gong X; Glick SJ; Liu B; Vedula AA; Thacker S
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1041-52. PubMed ID: 16696481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a breast software model for 2D and 3D X-ray imaging studies of the breast.
    Baneva Y; Bliznakova K; Cockmartin L; Marinov S; Buliev I; Mettivier G; Bosmans H; Russo P; Marshall N; Bliznakov Z
    Phys Med; 2017 Sep; 41():78-86. PubMed ID: 28483356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A computational model to generate simulated three-dimensional breast masses.
    de Sisternes L; Brankov JG; Zysk AM; Schmidt RA; Nishikawa RM; Wernick MN
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):1098-118. PubMed ID: 25652522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An iterative three-dimensional electron density imaging algorithm using uncollimated compton scattered x rays from a polyenergetic primary pencil beam.
    Van Uytven E; Pistorius S; Gordon R
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):256-65. PubMed ID: 17278511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization of X-ray scattering for various phantoms and clinical breast geometries using breast CT on a dedicated hybrid system.
    Shah JP; Mann SD; Tornai MP
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2017; 25(3):373-389. PubMed ID: 28157120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammogram synthesis using a 3D simulation. I. Breast tissue model and image acquisition simulation.
    Bakic PR; Albert M; Brzakovic D; Maidment AD
    Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2131-9. PubMed ID: 12349935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fast polyenergetic forward projection for image formation using OpenCL on a heterogeneous parallel computing platform.
    Zhou L; Clifford Chao KS; Chang J
    Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6745-56. PubMed ID: 23127068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visibility of microcalcification in cone beam breast CT: effects of X-ray tube voltage and radiation dose.
    Lai CJ; Shaw CC; Chen L; Altunbas MC; Liu X; Han T; Wang T; Yang WT; Whitman GJ; Tu SJ
    Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2995-3004. PubMed ID: 17822008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.