224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19673217)
1. The accuracy of the pencil beam convolution and anisotropic analytical algorithms in predicting the dose effects due to attenuation from immobilization devices and large air gaps.
Gray A; Oliver LD; Johnston PN
Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3181-91. PubMed ID: 19673217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SU-E-T-529: Dosimetric Evaluation with Heterogeneity in Acuros XB Advanced Dose Calculation Algorithm and Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA).
Rana S; Rogers K
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part18):3827. PubMed ID: 28518491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Superficial dose distribution in breast for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient geometries.
Chakarova R; Gustafsson M; Bäck A; Drugge N; Palm Å; Lindberg A; Berglund M
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21741719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Photon scatter in portal images: accuracy of a fluence based pencil beam superposition algorithm.
McCurdy BM; Pistorius S
Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):913-22. PubMed ID: 10841394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Testing of the analytical anisotropic algorithm for photon dose calculation.
Van Esch A; Tillikainen L; Pyykkonen J; Tenhunen M; Helminen H; Siljamäki S; Alakuijala J; Paiusco M; Lori M; Huyskens DP
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4130-48. PubMed ID: 17153392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Verification of IMRT dose calculations using AAA and PBC algorithms in dose buildup regions.
Oinam AS; Singh L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 11(4):3351. PubMed ID: 21081894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the analytical anisotropic algorithm in an extreme water-lung interface phantom using Monte Carlo dose calculations.
Gagné IM; Zavgorodni S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 8(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 17592451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Verification of dose calculation algorithms in a multi-layer heterogeneous phantom using films.
Rana S; Pokharel S
Gulf J Oncolog; 2013 Jul; 1(14):63-9. PubMed ID: 23996869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigation of AAA dose calculation algorithm accuracy in surface and buildup region for 6MV photon beam using markus parallel-plate ion chamber.
Kesen ND; Akbas U; Koksal C; Bilge H
J Xray Sci Technol; 2019; 27(2):361-369. PubMed ID: 30856153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantifying the effect of air gap, depth, and range shifter thickness on TPS dosimetric accuracy in superficial PBS proton therapy.
Shirey RJ; Wu HT
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):164-173. PubMed ID: 29239528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric validation of the anisotropic analytical algorithm for photon dose calculation: fundamental characterization in water.
Fogliata A; Nicolini G; Vanetti E; Clivio A; Cozzi L
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1421-38. PubMed ID: 16510953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between measured and calculated dynamic wedge dose distributions using the anisotropic analytic algorithm and pencil-beam convolution.
Caprile PF; Venencia CD; Besa P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 8(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 17592453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of 3D conformal breast radiation treatment plans using the anisotropic analytical algorithm and pencil beam convolution algorithm.
Yoo S; Wu Q; O'Daniel J; Horton J; Yin FF
Radiother Oncol; 2012 May; 103(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 22349127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dose prediction accuracy of anisotropic analytical algorithm and pencil beam convolution algorithm beyond high density heterogeneity interface.
Rana SB
South Asian J Cancer; 2013 Jan; 2(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 24455541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The accuracy of dose calculations by anisotropic analytical algorithms for stereotactic radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Kan MW; Cheung JY; Leung LH; Lau BM; Yu PK
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jan; 56(2):397-413. PubMed ID: 21178236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric evaluation of the Acuros XB algorithm for a 4 MV photon beam in head and neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Hirata K; Nakamura M; Yoshimura M; Mukumoto N; Nakata M; Ito H; Inokuchi H; Matsuo Y; Mizowaki T; Hiraoka M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 16(4):52–64. PubMed ID: 26218997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. SU-D-211-01: Effect of Immobilization/support Devices and Air Gap on Skin Doses for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy with Abdominal Compression Device.
Peng Y
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part3):3610. PubMed ID: 28517396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of the Eclipse AAA algorithm at extended SSD.
Hussain A; Villarreal-Barajas E; Brown D; Dunscombe P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 11(3):3213. PubMed ID: 20717088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetric evaluation of photon dose calculation under jaw and MLC shielding.
Fogliata A; Clivio A; Vanetti E; Nicolini G; Belosi MF; Cozzi L
Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101706. PubMed ID: 24089896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
