225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19673217)
41. Development of a golden beam data set for the commissioning of a proton double-scattering system in a pencil-beam dose calculation algorithm.
Slopsema RL; Lin L; Flampouri S; Yeung D; Li Z; McDonough JE; Palta J
Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091710. PubMed ID: 25186385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Commissioning and evaluation of an extended SSD photon model for PINNACLE3: an application to total body irradiation.
Lavallée MC; Gingras L; Chrétien M; Aubin S; Côté C; Beaulieu L
Med Phys; 2009 Aug; 36(8):3844-55. PubMed ID: 19746817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Experimental validation of the Eclipse AAA algorithm.
Breitman K; Rathee S; Newcomb C; Murray B; Robinson D; Field C; Warkentin H; Connors S; Mackenzie M; Dunscombe P; Fallone G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2007 May; 8(2):76-92. PubMed ID: 17592457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Dosimetric characterization of the iBEAM evo carbon fiber couch for radiotherapy.
Smith DW; Christophides D; Dean C; Naisbit M; Mason J; Morgan A
Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3595-606. PubMed ID: 20831067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The effect of different lung densities on the accuracy of various radiotherapy dose calculation methods: implications for tumour coverage.
Aarup LR; Nahum AE; Zacharatou C; Juhler-Nøttrup T; Knöös T; Nyström H; Specht L; Wieslander E; Korreman SS
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jun; 91(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 19297051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: comparison with Monte Carlo calculations.
Fogliata A; Vanetti E; Albers D; Brink C; Clivio A; Knöös T; Nicolini G; Cozzi L
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1363-85. PubMed ID: 17301460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Collapsed cone convolution and analytical anisotropic algorithm dose calculations compared to VMC++ Monte Carlo simulations in clinical cases.
Hasenbalg F; Neuenschwander H; Mini R; Born EJ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3679-91. PubMed ID: 17664570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparison of inhomogeneity correction algorithms in small photon fields.
Jones AO; Das IJ
Med Phys; 2005 Mar; 32(3):766-76. PubMed ID: 15839349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Technical Report: Evaluation of peripheral dose for flattening filter free photon beams.
Covington EL; Ritter TA; Moran JM; Owrangi AM; Prisciandaro JI
Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4789. PubMed ID: 27487896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Inclusion of compensator-induced scatter and beam filtration in pencil beam dose calculations.
du Plessis FC; Willemse CA
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2896-904. PubMed ID: 16964866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Dosimetric evaluation of Acuros XB dose calculation algorithm with measurements in predicting doses beyond different air gap thickness for smaller and larger field sizes.
Rana S; Rogers K
J Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 38(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 23532180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Assessing the effect of electron density in photon dose calculations.
Seco J; Evans PM
Med Phys; 2006 Feb; 33(2):540-52. PubMed ID: 16532961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Implementation and experimental validation of the high dose rate stereotactic treatment mode at Varian accelerators.
Hoffmann L
Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 18759143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Photon beam relative dose validation of the DPM Monte Carlo code in lung-equivalent media.
Chetty IJ; Charland PM; Tyagi N; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Bielajew AF
Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):563-73. PubMed ID: 12722808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Clinical implications of the anisotropic analytical algorithm for IMRT treatment planning and verification.
Bragg CM; Wingate K; Conway J
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Feb; 86(2):276-84. PubMed ID: 18249453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Characterization of differences in calculated and actual measured skin doses to canine limbs during stereotactic radiosurgery using Gafchromic film.
Walters J; Ryan S; Harmon JF
Med Dosim; 2012; 37(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 21982380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A convolution model to convert transmission dose images to exit dose distributions.
Boellaard R; van Herk M; Mijnheer BJ
Med Phys; 1997 Feb; 24(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 9048358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Impact of air gap, range shifter, and delivery technique on skin dose in proton therapy.
Kern A; Bäumer C; Kröninger K; Wulff J; Timmermann B
Med Phys; 2021 Feb; 48(2):831-840. PubMed ID: 33368345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
