1568 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19673223)
1. Recommendations for clinical electron beam dosimetry: supplement to the recommendations of Task Group 25.
Gerbi BJ; Antolak JA; Deibel FC; Followill DS; Herman MG; Higgins PD; Huq MS; Mihailidis DN; Yorke ED; Hogstrom KR; Khan FM
Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3239-79. PubMed ID: 19673223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
Araki F; Kubo HD
Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
Almond PR; Biggs PJ; Coursey BM; Hanson WF; Huq MS; Nath R; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 1999 Sep; 26(9):1847-70. PubMed ID: 10505874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
Tailor RC; Hanson WF
Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy photon beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
Saiful Huq M; Andreo P
Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 11213922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical reference dosimetry: comparison between AAPM TG-21 and TG-51 protocols.
Ding GX; Cygler JE; Kwok CB
Med Phys; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1217-25. PubMed ID: 10902550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study.
Palmans H; Nafaa L; De JJ; Gillis S; Hoornaert MT; Martens C; Piessens M; Thierens H; Van der Plaetsen A; Vynckier S
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 11848121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The IPEM code of practice for electron dosimetry for radiotherapy beams of initial energy from 4 to 25 MeV based on an absorbed dose to water calibration.
Thwaites DI; DuSautoy AR; Jordan T; McEwen MR; Nisbet A; Nahum AE; Pitchford WG;
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Sep; 48(18):2929-70. PubMed ID: 14529204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reference dose determination in 60Co and high-energy radiotherapy photon beams by using Farmer-type cylindrical ionization chambers - an experimental investigation.
Swanpalmer J
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 May; 6(4):045003. PubMed ID: 33444264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams: a comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and previous international codes of practice. International Atomic Energy Agency.
Andreo P; Huq MS; Westermark M; Song H; Tilikidis A; DeWerd L; Shortt K
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3033-53. PubMed ID: 12361209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new approach to electron-beam reference dosimetry.
Rogers DW
Med Phys; 1998 Mar; 25(3):310-20. PubMed ID: 9547498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between TG-51 and TG-21: Calibration of photon and electron beams in water using cylindrical chambers.
Cho SH; Lowenstein JR; Balter PA; Wells NH; Hanson WF
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2000; 1(3):108-15. PubMed ID: 11674825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A round-robin gamma stereotactic radiosurgery dosimetry interinstitution comparison of calibration protocols.
Drzymala RE; Alvarez PE; Bednarz G; Bourland JD; DeWerd LA; Ma L; Meltsner SG; Neyman G; Novotny J; Petti PL; Rivard MJ; Shiu AS; Goetsch SJ
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6745-56. PubMed ID: 26520764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A dosimetry study comparing NCS report-5, IAEA TRS-381, AAPM TG-51 and IAEA TRS-398 in three clinical electron beam energies.
Palmans H; Nafaa L; de Patoul N; Denis JM; Tomsej M; Vynckier S
Phys Med Biol; 2003 May; 48(9):1091-107. PubMed ID: 12765324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The advantages of absorbed-dose calibration factors.
Rogers DW
Med Phys; 1992; 19(5):1227-39. PubMed ID: 1435604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combining tissue-phantom ratios to provide a beam-quality specifier for flattening filter free photon beams.
Dalaryd M; Knöös T; Ceberg C
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111716. PubMed ID: 25370630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The calibration and use of plane-parallel ionization chambers for dosimetry of electron beams: an extension of the 1983 AAPM protocol report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 39.
Almond PR; Attix FH; Humphries LJ; Kubo H; Nath R; Goetsch S; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 1994 Aug; 21(8):1251-60. PubMed ID: 7799867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differences in electron beam dosimetry using two commercial ionization chambers and the TG-21 protocol: another reason to switch to TG-51.
Followill DS; Hanson WF; Ibbott GS; Eglezopoulos LR; Chui CS
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2003; 4(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 12777147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
