110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19674094)
1. Good genes drive female choice for mating partners in the lek-breeding European treefrog.
Jaquiéry J; Broquet T; Aguilar C; Evanno G; Perrin N
Evolution; 2010 Jan; 64(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 19674094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Opportunity for sexual selection and effective population size in the lek-breeding European treefrog (Hyla arborea).
Broquet T; Jaquiéry J; Perrin N
Evolution; 2009 Mar; 63(3):674-83. PubMed ID: 19087183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
Neff BD; Pitcher TE
Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mate choice evolution, dominance effects, and the maintenance of genetic variation.
Lehmann L; Keller LF; Kokko H
J Theor Biol; 2007 Jan; 244(2):282-95. PubMed ID: 16979189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Paternal genetic effects on offspring fitness are context dependent within the extrapair mating system of a socially monogamous passerine.
Schmoll T; Dietrich V; Winkel W; Epplen JT; Schurr F; Lubjuhn T
Evolution; 2005 Mar; 59(3):645-57. PubMed ID: 15856706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating genetic benefits of polyandry from experimental studies: a meta-analysis.
Slatyer RA; Mautz BS; Backwell PR; Jennions MD
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2012 Feb; 87(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 21545390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mate choice for nonadditive genetic benefits correlate with MHC dissimilarity in the rose bitterling (Rhodeus ocellatus).
Agbali M; Reichard M; Bryjová A; Bryja J; Smith C
Evolution; 2010 Jun; 64(6):1683-96. PubMed ID: 20148959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The good-genes and compatible-genes benefits of mate choice.
Puurtinen M; Ketola T; Kotiaho JS
Am Nat; 2009 Nov; 174(5):741-52. PubMed ID: 19772439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Calling is an honest indicator of paternal genetic quality in poison frogs.
Forsman A; Hagman M
Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):2148-57. PubMed ID: 17133871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The transition to social inbred mating systems in spiders: role of inbreeding tolerance in a subsocial predecessor.
Bilde T; Lubin Y; Smith D; Schneider JM; Maklakov AA
Evolution; 2005 Jan; 59(1):160-74. PubMed ID: 15792236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outbreeding depression, but no inbreeding depression in haplodiploid Ambrosia beetles with regular sibling mating.
Peer K; Taborsky M
Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):317-23. PubMed ID: 15807418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sexual conflict in the wild: elevated mating rate reduces female lifetime reproductive success.
Maklakov AA; Bilde T; Lubin Y
Am Nat; 2005 May; 165 Suppl 5():S38-45. PubMed ID: 15795860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The roles of natural and sexual selection during adaptation to a novel environment.
Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF; Blows MW
Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2218-25. PubMed ID: 17236415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
Fedina TY; Lewis SM
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do male moor frogs (Rana arvalis) lek with kin?
Knopp T; Heimovirta M; Kokko H; Merilä J
Mol Ecol; 2008 May; 17(10):2522-30. PubMed ID: 18422930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mate choice on fallow deer leks.
Clutton-Brock TH; Hiraiwa-Hasegawa M; Robertson A
Nature; 1989 Aug; 340(6233):463-5. PubMed ID: 2755506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evolution of mate choice for genome-wide heterozygosity.
Fromhage L; Kokko H; Reid JM
Evolution; 2009 Mar; 63(3):684-94. PubMed ID: 19220455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inbreeding avoidance under different null models of random mating in the great tit.
Szulkin M; Zelazowski P; Nicholson G; Sheldon BC
J Anim Ecol; 2009 Jul; 78(4):778-88. PubMed ID: 19383076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Geographic variation of genetic and behavioral traits in northern and southern tüngara frogs.
Pröhl H; Koshy RA; Mueller U; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
Evolution; 2006 Aug; 60(8):1669-79. PubMed ID: 17017067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Female mating bias results in conflicting sex-specific offspring fitness.
Fedorka KM; Mousseau TA
Nature; 2004 May; 429(6987):65-7. PubMed ID: 15129280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
