BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1967429)

  • 1. Screening for cancer of the cervix in elderly women.
    Fletcher A
    Lancet; 1990 Jan; 335(8681):97-9. PubMed ID: 1967429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cervical cancer screening programs. II. Screening for carcinoma of the cervix.
    Can Med Assoc J; 1976 Jun; 114(11):1013-26. PubMed ID: 776379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prevalence of self-reported cervical cancer screening and impact on cervical cancer mortality in Austria.
    Vutuc C; Haidinger G; Waldhoer T; Ahmad F; Breitenecker G
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1999 May; 111(9):354-9. PubMed ID: 10407996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reasons that some screening programmes fail to control cervical cancer.
    Chamberlain J
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):161-8. PubMed ID: 3570402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cervical cancer screening and the older woman: obstacles and opportunities.
    Brooks SE
    Cancer Pract; 1996; 4(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 8826140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The pitfalls of cervical cancer screening.
    Sedlis A
    Contrib Gynecol Obstet; 1991; 18():103-14. PubMed ID: 1657521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is cervical screening necessary in older women?
    Cruickshank ME
    Cytopathology; 2001 Dec; 12(6):351-3. PubMed ID: 11843936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does cervical cancer screening do more harm than good?
    Payne L; Lavis P
    Nurs Times; 2001 Jul 19-25; 97(29):20. PubMed ID: 11957496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prophylactic cytological investigation for cervical cancer in relation to stage at diagnosis: a study of 420 women in Denmark.
    Olesen F
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1988 Aug; 38(313):356-9. PubMed ID: 3256647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Are analyses of cytological cervix smears from young women more harmful than beneficial?].
    Skjeldestad FE; Hagen B; Hagmar B; Iversen OE; Juvkam KH; Steen R; Thoresen S; Hareide B
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jun; 127(13):1782-5. PubMed ID: 17599128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Survival trend after invasive cervical cancer diagnosis in Sweden before and after cytologic screening. 1960-1984.
    Adami HO; Pontén J; Sparén P; Bergström R; Gustafsson L; Friberg LG
    Cancer; 1994 Jan; 73(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 8275416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pitfalls in the screening and early diagnosis of cervical cancer.
    Wain GV; Hacker NF
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Feb; 2(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 2102310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screening for cervical cancer.
    Eddy DM
    Ann Intern Med; 1990 Aug; 113(3):214-26. PubMed ID: 2115753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical cancer screening. Past success and future challenge.
    Dewar MA; Hall K; Perchalski J
    Prim Care; 1992 Sep; 19(3):589-606. PubMed ID: 1410065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Costs and benefits of cervical screening. II. Is it worthwhile reducing the screening interval from 5 to 3 years?
    Waugh N; Robertson A
    Cytopathology; 1996 Aug; 7(4):241-8. PubMed ID: 8853970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cytologic screening for cancer of the uterine cervix in Sweden evaluated by identification and simulation.
    Gustafsson L; Adami HO
    Br J Cancer; 1990 Jun; 61(6):903-8. PubMed ID: 2372495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical screening in older women.
    Ogilvie D
    Cytopathology; 2002 Oct; 13(5):333. PubMed ID: 12421452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Progress in the early detection of cervix cancer from the viewpoint of the Saarland cancer register].
    Brenner H; Wiebelt H; Ziegler H
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1990 Apr; 50(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 2358181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Cancer of the cervix uteri: analysis of the cost-benefit and efficacy of opportunistic screening versus organized screening].
    Castronovo V; Foidart JM; Boniver J
    Rev Med Liege; 1998 May; 53(5):305-7. PubMed ID: 9689888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical Cancer Screening and Incidence by Age: Unmet Needs Near and After the Stopping Age for Screening.
    White MC; Shoemaker ML; Benard VB
    Am J Prev Med; 2017 Sep; 53(3):392-395. PubMed ID: 28473240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.