These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19674393)

  • 21. Detecting our own vocal errors: An event-related study of the thresholds for perceiving and compensating for vocal pitch errors.
    Scheerer NE; Jones JA
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jun; 114():158-167. PubMed ID: 29221832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cortical activity prior to predictable postural instability: is there a difference between self-initiated and externally-initiated perturbations?
    Mochizuki G; Sibley KM; Cheung HJ; McIlroy WE
    Brain Res; 2009 Jul; 1279():29-36. PubMed ID: 19422812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Neurophysiological indices of speech and nonspeech stimulus processing.
    Tampas JW; Harkrider AW; Hedrick MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1147-64. PubMed ID: 16411803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Differential effects of perturbation direction and magnitude on the neural processing of voice pitch feedback.
    Liu H; Meshman M; Behroozmand R; Larson CR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 May; 122(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 20869305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bioelectrical brain effects of one's own voice identification in pitch of voice auditory feedback.
    Korzyukov O; Bronder A; Lee Y; Patel S; Larson CR
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jul; 101():106-114. PubMed ID: 28461225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mismatch negativity (MMN) in multiple sclerosis: an event-related potentials study in 46 patients.
    Jung J; Morlet D; Mercier B; Confavreux C; Fischer C
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Jan; 117(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 16325469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Action-effect negativity: irrelevant action effects are monitored like relevant feedback.
    Band GP; van Steenbergen H; Ridderinkhof KR; Falkenstein M; Hommel B
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Dec; 82(3):211-8. PubMed ID: 19665516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Neural bases of sensorimotor adaptation in the vocal motor system.
    Behroozmand R; Sangtian S
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jul; 236(7):1881-1895. PubMed ID: 29696312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An fMRI study of verbal self-monitoring: neural correlates of auditory verbal feedback.
    Fu CH; Vythelingum GN; Brammer MJ; Williams SC; Amaro E; Andrew CM; Yágüez L; van Haren NE; Matsumoto K; McGuire PK
    Cereb Cortex; 2006 Jul; 16(7):969-77. PubMed ID: 16195470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effects of fetal alcohol syndrome on response execution and inhibition: an event-related potential study.
    Burden MJ; Andrew C; Saint-Amour D; Meintjes EM; Molteno CD; Hoyme HE; Robinson LK; Khaole N; Nelson CA; Jacobson JL; Jacobson SW
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2009 Nov; 33(11):1994-2004. PubMed ID: 19719791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Brain potentials related to self-generated and external information used for performance monitoring.
    Müller SV; Möller J; Rodriguez-Fornells A; Münte TF
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jan; 116(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 15589185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Listen up! Processing of intensity change differs for vocal and nonvocal sounds.
    Schirmer A; Simpson E; Escoffier N
    Brain Res; 2007 Oct; 1176():103-12. PubMed ID: 17900543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Neurophysiological evidence of differential mechanisms involved in producing opposing and following responses to altered auditory feedback.
    Li W; Chen Z; Liu P; Zhang B; Huang D; Liu H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Nov; 124(11):2161-71. PubMed ID: 23751154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pauses and intonational phrasing: ERP studies in 5-month-old German infants and adults.
    Männel C; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 21(10):1988-2006. PubMed ID: 19296725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On the relationship between occipital cortex activity and inhibition of return.
    Prime DJ; Jolicoeur P
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Nov; 46(6):1278-87. PubMed ID: 19572908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. ERP correlates of auditory processing during automatic correction of unexpected perturbations in voice auditory feedback.
    Korzyukov O; Karvelis L; Behroozmand R; Larson CR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 22044551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Speech versus tone processing in compensated dyslexia: discrimination and lateralization with a dichotic mismatch negativity (MMN) paradigm.
    Sebastian C; Yasin I
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Nov; 70(2):115-26. PubMed ID: 18801392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Transdermal nicotine administration enhances automatic auditory processing reflected by mismatch negativity.
    Inami R; Kirino E; Inoue R; Arai H
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2005 Mar; 80(3):453-61. PubMed ID: 15740788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. ERP correlates of involuntary attention capture by prosodic salience in speech.
    Wang J; Friedman D; Ritter W; Bersick M
    Psychophysiology; 2005 Jan; 42(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 15720580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Automatic auditory change detection in humans is influenced by visual-auditory associative learning.
    Laine M; Kwon MS; Hämäläinen H
    Neuroreport; 2007 Oct; 18(16):1697-701. PubMed ID: 17921871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.