160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19674394)
1. On the differentiation of N2 components in an appetitive choice task: evidence for the revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory.
Leue A; Chavanon ML; Wacker J; Stemmler G
Psychophysiology; 2009 Nov; 46(6):1244-57. PubMed ID: 19674394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Distinguishing between learning and motivation in behavioral tests of the reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality.
Smillie LD; Dalgleish LI; Jackson CJ
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Apr; 33(4):476-89. PubMed ID: 17363762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risky economic choices and frontal EEG asymmetry in the context of Reinforcer-Sensitivity-Theory-5.
Rollwage M; Comtesse H; Stemmler G
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 17(5):984-1001. PubMed ID: 28653192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sequence effects support the conflict theory of N2 and P3 in the Go/NoGo task.
Smith JL; Smith EA; Provost AL; Heathcote A
Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar; 75(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 19951723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A meta-analysis of reinforcement sensitivity theory: on performance parameters in reinforcement tasks.
Leue A; Beauducel A
Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2008 Nov; 12(4):353-69. PubMed ID: 18544711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Neurocognitive components of the behavioral inhibition and activation systems: implications for theories of self-regulation.
Amodio DM; Master SL; Yee CM; Taylor SE
Psychophysiology; 2008 Jan; 45(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 17910730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Individual differences in drivers' cognitive processing of road safety messages.
Kaye SA; White MJ; Lewis IM
Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():272-81. PubMed ID: 22608267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner.
Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Inuggi A; Blasi V; Cursi M; Annovazzi P; Comi G; Falini A; Leocani L
Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Error-related ERP components and individual differences in punishment and reward sensitivity.
Boksem MA; Tops M; Wester AE; Meijman TF; Lorist MM
Brain Res; 2006 Jul; 1101(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 16784728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The N2 component in a go-nogo learning task: Motivation, behavioral activation, and reasoning.
Scheuble V; Nieden K; Leue A; Beauducel A
Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Mar; 137():1-11. PubMed ID: 30590087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modulation of the error-related negativity by response conflict.
Danielmeier C; Wessel JR; Steinhauser M; Ullsperger M
Psychophysiology; 2009 Nov; 46(6):1288-98. PubMed ID: 19572907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modulation of the conflict monitoring intensity: the role of aversive reinforcement, cognitive demand, and trait-BIS.
Leue A; Lange S; Beauducel A
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2012 Jun; 12(2):287-307. PubMed ID: 22351495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The behavioral approach system and augmenting/reducing in auditory event-related potentials during emotional visual stimulation.
De Pascalis V; Fracasso F; Corr PJ
Biol Psychol; 2017 Feb; 123():310-323. PubMed ID: 27816656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reinforcement sensitivity of sex offenders and non-offenders: an experimental and psychometric study of reinforcement sensitivity theory.
Leue A; Brocke B; Hoyer J
Br J Psychol; 2008 Aug; 99(Pt 3):361-78. PubMed ID: 17662171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. BIS, BAS, and response conflict: Testing predictions of the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory.
Berkman ET; Lieberman MD; Gable SL
Pers Individ Dif; 2009; 46(5-6):586-591. PubMed ID: 20046938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory and Problem Gambling in a General Population Sample.
Farrell N; Walker BR
J Gambl Stud; 2019 Dec; 35(4):1163-1175. PubMed ID: 31055690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neural reward processing is modulated by approach- and avoidance-related personality traits.
Simon JJ; Walther S; Fiebach CJ; Friederich HC; Stippich C; Weisbrod M; Kaiser S
Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(2):1868-74. PubMed ID: 19770056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An ERP study of the processing of response conflict in a dynamic localization task: the role of individual differences in task-appropriate behavior.
Fritzsche AS; Stahl J; Gibbons H
Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Aug; 121(8):1358-70. PubMed ID: 20363184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality Questionnaire (RST-PQ): Development and validation.
Corr PJ; Cooper AJ
Psychol Assess; 2016 Nov; 28(11):1427-1440. PubMed ID: 26845224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fractionating negative and positive affectivity in handedness: Insights from the Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of personality.
Beaton AA; Mutinelli S; Corr PJ
Laterality; 2017 Jul; 22(4):419-444. PubMed ID: 27467189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
