These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19674394)

  • 41. Auditory-induced emotion modulates processes of response inhibition: an event-related potential study.
    Yu F; Yuan J; Luo YJ
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jan; 20(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 18978645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Cognitive control adjustments and conflict adaptation in major depressive disorder.
    Clawson A; Clayson PE; Larson MJ
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Aug; 50(8):711-21. PubMed ID: 23735120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Development and Validation of a Short Version of the Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality Questionnaire (RST-PQ-S).
    Vecchione M; Corr PJ
    J Pers Assess; 2021; 103(4):535-546. PubMed ID: 32783537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex integrates reinforcement history to guide voluntary behavior.
    Holroyd CB; Coles MG
    Cortex; 2008 May; 44(5):548-59. PubMed ID: 18387587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Individual Differences in the Context-Dependent Recruitment of Cognitive Control: Evidence From Action Versus State Orientation.
    Fischer R; Plessow F; Dreisbach G; Goschke T
    J Pers; 2015 Oct; 83(5):575-83. PubMed ID: 25297472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?
    Dimoska A; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Nov; 62(2):98-112. PubMed ID: 16814442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Neural response to reward anticipation is modulated by Gray's impulsivity.
    Hahn T; Dresler T; Ehlis AC; Plichta MM; Heinzel S; Polak T; Lesch KP; Breuer F; Jakob PM; Fallgatter AJ
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jul; 46(4):1148-53. PubMed ID: 19328237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Examining habituation of the startle reflex with the reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality.
    Blanch A; Aluja A; Blanco E; Balada F
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Oct; 53(10):1535-41. PubMed ID: 27401960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effects of task complexity on ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks.
    Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 22906814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A cognitive neuroscience approach to individual differences in sensitivity to reward.
    Avila C; Parcet MA; Barrós-Loscertales A
    Neurotox Res; 2008 Oct; 14(2-3):191-203. PubMed ID: 19073426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Are low and high number magnitudes processed differently while resolving the conflict evoked by the SNARC effect?
    Gut M; Szumska I; Wasilewska M; Jaśkowski P
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jul; 85(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 22343113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Sensitivity to punishment and reward omission: evidence from error-related ERP components.
    Boksem MA; Tops M; Kostermans E; De Cremer D
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct; 79(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 18571302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Impulsivity and behaviour problems in dogs: A Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory perspective.
    Piotti P; Satchell LP; Lockhart TS
    Behav Processes; 2018 Jun; 151():104-110. PubMed ID: 29530813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. How reinforcement sensitivity and perceived risk influence young drivers' reported engagement in risky driving behaviors.
    Harbeck EL; Glendon AI
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 May; 54():73-80. PubMed ID: 23474239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Behavioural Inhibition System (BIS) sensitivity differentiates EEG theta responses during goal conflict in a continuous monitoring task.
    Moore RA; Mills M; Marshman P; Corr PJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Aug; 85(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 22732350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Behavioral approach and reward processing: results on feedback-related negativity and P3 component.
    Lange S; Leue A; Beauducel A
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Feb; 89(2):416-25. PubMed ID: 22178442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Linking personality and brain anatomy: a structural MRI approach to Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory.
    Adrián-Ventura J; Costumero V; Parcet MA; Ávila C
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2019 Mar; 14(3):329-338. PubMed ID: 30753654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The relation of cortical activity and BIS/BAS on the trait level.
    Hewig J; Hagemann D; Seifert J; Naumann E; Bartussek D
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Jan; 71(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 16360880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Handedness and behavioural inhibition system/behavioural activation system (BIS/BAS) scores: A replication and extension of Wright, Hardie, and Wilson (2009).
    Beaton AA; Kaack IH; Corr PJ
    Laterality; 2015; 20(5):585-603. PubMed ID: 25697855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. When cognitive control is calibrated: event-related potential correlates of adapting to information-processing conflict despite erroneous response preparation.
    Freitas AL; Banai R; Clark SL
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Nov; 46(6):1226-33. PubMed ID: 19572903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.